Evaluating pre-split performance through direct measurements of near field acceleration,particle velocity and gas pressure

Abstract

Pre-split techniques are routinely used to minimise rock mass damage from production blasting. Design parameters rely on site-specific guidelines and in order to improve designs, it is important to be able to measure its performance. One criterion is related to the pre-split ability to adequately filter blast-induced stresses and explosion gases. This paper presents the results of a monitoring program implemented to evaluate the performance of pre-split practices. Triaxial accelerometers and pressure sensors were installed behind pre-split lines and a site-specific criterion was established to determine whether or not filtering effects were occurring. The recorded maximum peak particle velocity (PPV) vector sum behind pre-splits in all blasts monitored was below the threshold of damage of intact rock and rock mass discontinuities. With regards to the recorded gas pressure, measurements from production blasts showed fluctuations of low pressure levels, indicating that pre-split parameters were effectively filtering-induced stresses and gases.

Keywords

Blasting Blast monitoring Pre-split practices Wall control practices Blast-induced damage

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Brent

G. F.

and Smith

G. E.

2000. The detection of blast damage by borehole pressure measurement, The Journal of The South African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, 100, (1), 17–21.

Catalan

and Onederra

2015. Implementation of leading practice geotechnical and blasting performance evaluations at Centinela Sulphide mine. In: IMM transactions (Section A). [Under review].

Hustrulid

1999. Blasting principles for open pit mining, Volume 1 – general design concepts, The Netherlands, Balkema Publishers.

Kanchibotla

1994. Models for assessing the blasting performance of explosives. PhD, The University of Queensland.

Kanchibotla

, Morell

, Valery

and Loughlin

1998. Exploring the effects of blast design on SAG mill throughput at KCGM, in Mine to Mill Conference, Brisbane, Australia. Carlton, Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, 153–158.

Kojovic

, Kanchibotla

S. S.

, Poetschka

N. L.

and Chapman

1998. The effect of blast design on the lump: fines ratio at Marandoo iron ore operations, in Mine to Mill Conference, Brisbane, Australia. Carlton, Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, 149–152.

Lymbery

S. C.

2001. Hydrodynamic extension of radial fractures by explosive gas loading. PhD Thesis, University of Queensland.

MREL. 2014. Available at: < http://www.mrel.com/blasting_instrumentation/datatrap.html> [Accessed May 2014] DataTrap Specifications [Online].

Onederra

, Brunton

, Battista

and Grace

2004. Shot to shovel – understanding the impact of muckpile conditions and operator proficiency on instantaneous shovel productivity. In: Proceedings of EXPLO, 26-28 July 2004 (ed. AUSIMM). Perth, WA, The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, no. 3, 205–213.

10.

Ouchterlony

1995. Review of rock blasting and explosives engineering research at SveBeFo, in EXPLO ’95 Conference, 1995 Brisbane, Australia. Carlton, Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, 95, (6), 133–146.

11.

Read

and Stacey

2009. Implementation, in Chapter 11. guidelines for open pit slope design, (ed. CSIRO., Australia, CSIRO).

12.

Scott

, Kanchibotla

and Morrell

1999. Blasting for Mine to Mill optimisation. In: Explo ’99 Conference, 1999, Kalgoorlie, Australia 3–8, Carlton, Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy.

13.

Sullivan

T. D.

2006. Pit slope design and risk – a view of the current state of the art. In: International Symposium on Stability of rock slopes in open pit mining and civil engineering situations, (ed. Metallurgy

S. A. I. O. M. A.

, Cape Town).