Measuring blast fragmentation at Esperanza mine using high-resolution 3D laser scanning

Abstract

Image analysis as a technique for fragmentation measurement of rock piles has been the subject of research since the 1980s, and to date, run of mine (ROM) fragmentation optimisation studies have primarily relied on particle size measurement using photographic-based 2D imaging systems. Disadvantages of 2D imaging systems include particle delineation errors because of variable lighting and material colour and texture variation; no direct measure of scale and perspective distortion; and inability to distinguish overlapped particles, non-overlapped particles, and areas of fines. With the development of 3D imaging technologies, there is an opportunity to develop techniques that could improve data collection and overcome the limitations of existing 2D image-based systems. This paper describes the first attempt to use 3D high-resolution laser scanning techniques to quantify ‘whole of muckpile’ fragmentation from full-scale production blasting. During two monitoring campaigns in 2013, high-resolution laser scanning data were collected from production blasts at Esperanza mine (Antofagasta Minerals Group). Fully automated analysis of the 3D data was possible in all cases where the data were of sufficiently high resolution. Manual pre-processing was required when the data were of low resolution to specify the region of fines. Overall results indicated that ROM fragmentation requirements were meeting specified targets, despite the marked differences in powder factors. This was particularly the case for those blasts conducted in similar geological domains. This work has demonstrated that high-resolution laser scanning can be used as an alternative technique to measure ‘whole of muckpile’ fragmentation in production blasting.

Keywords

Fragmentation Blasting Laser scanning Blast optimisation 3D image processing

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Carlsson

and Nyberg

1983. A method for estimation of fragmentation size distribution with automatic image processing, Proc. First International Symposium on Rock Fragmentation by Blasting– FRAGBLAST, August 1983, 333–345, Lulea, Sweden.

Delille

, Goetz

and Tessier

2013. Return on experience from full-scale open pit blasting experiments, Measurement and Analysis of Blast Fragmentation, Workshop at FRAGBLAST 10 - The 10th International Symposium on Rock Fragmentation by Blasting, Delhi, India, November 2012, 107–114, CRC Press/Balkema. ISBN 978-041562140-3.

Maptek (2014). Available: http://www.maptek.com/products/i-site/

Noy

. 2006. The latest in on-line fragmentation measurement – stereo imaging over a conveyor, Proceedings of the Eighth International Symposium on Rock Fragmentation by Blasting – FRAGBLAST 8, May 2006, 61–66.

Noy

. 2013. Automated rock fragmentation measurement with close range digital photogrammetry, Measurement and Analysis of Blast Fragmentation. Workshop at FRAGBLAST 10 - The 10th International Symposium on Rock Fragmentation by Blasting, Delhi, India, November 2012, 13–21, CRC Press/Balkema. ISBN 978-041562140-3.

Onederra

, Mardones

and Scherpenisse

2010. Application of stochastic approach to blast fragmentation modelling, Min. Technol., 119, (4), 221–232.

Ord

1988. Real-time image analysis of size and shape distributions of rock fragments, Explosives in Mining Workshop, November 1988, 115–119, Melbourne, The AusIMM.

Potts

and Ouchterlony

2005. The capacity of image analysis to measure fragmentation, an evaluation using split desktop, Technical Report, Swebrec - Swedish Rock Breaking Institute. ISSN 1653–5006.

Rosato

, Strandburg

, Prinz

and Swendsen

R.H

. 1987. Why the brazil nuts are on top: size segregation of particulate matter by shaking, Phys. Rev. Lett., 58, (10), 1038–1040.

10.

Thurley

and Ng

. 2005. Identifying, visualizing, and comparing regions in irregularly spaced 3D surface data, Comput. Vis. Image Underst., 98, (2), 239–270.

11.

Thurley

and Ng

2008. Identification and sizing of the entirely visible rocks from a 3D surface data segmentation of laboratory rock piles, Comput. Vis. Image Underst., 111, (2), 170–178.

12.

Thurley

. 2009. Fragmentation size measurement using 3D surface imaging (in LHD buckets), Proceedings of the Ninth International Symposium on Rock Fragmentation by Blasting – FRAGBLAST 9, September 2009, 133–140, Granada, Spain.

13.

Thurley

. 2011. Automated online measurement of limestone particle size distributions using 3D range data, J. Process Control, 21, (2), 254–262.

14.

Thurley

. 2012. Automated, on-line, calibration-free, particle size measurement using 3D profile data, Measurement and Analysis of Blast Fragmentation Workshop at FRAGBLAST 10 - The 10th International Symposium on Rock Fragmentation by Blasting, Delhi, India, November 2012, 23–32, CRC Press/Balkema. ISBN 978-041562140-3.

15.

Thurley

2013. Automated image segmentation and analysis of rock piles in an open-pit mine, 2013 International Conference on Digital Image Computing: Techniques and Applications (DICTA 2013), Hobart, Australia, 26–28 November 2013, Vol. 8, 6691484, Piscataway, NJ, IEEE.

16.

Venkatesh

, Vamshidhar

, Gopinath

, Theresraj

and Balachander

2013. Optimisation of blast design for an iron ore mine and assessment of fragmentation through image processing, Measurement and Analysis of Blast Fragmentation. Workshop at FRAGBLAST 10 - The 10th International Symposium on Rock Fragmentation by Blasting, Delhi, India, November 2012, 123–131, CRC Press/Balkema. ISBN 978-041562140-3.