Corporate social responsibility (CSR) as a path to sustainability is well recognised. Here, an aggregate methodology of observation, comparison and estimation is used to explore the multiple dimensions and dynamics of CSR and to construct a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (AHP) model for CSR assessment. A state-owned corporation is taken as a case study. It is concluded that social responsibility has a dual nature, with both objective and subjective aspects. The issues of CSR in China are evolving from a latent to an emerging stage but far from consolidation and institutionalisation, while CSR responses and performance levels of corporations are evolving from defensive and compliance stages to a managerial stage but far from strategic and civil stages. National and corporate approaches are proposed for CSR risk mitigation and capacity building. Corporations are encouraged to be adaptive in taking social responsibilities commensurate to the capacities and contexts under which they operate.
AzapagicA.2004. Developing a framework for sustainable development indicators for the mining and minerals industry, J. Clean. Prod., 12, 639–662.
2.
CarrollAB. 1991. The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders, Bus. Horiz., 34, 39–48.
3.
CarrollAB and BuchholtzAK. 2003. Business and society: ethics and stakeholder management, 5th edn, Australia, Thomson South-Western.
4.
ClarksonME. 1995. A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance, Acad. Manage. Rev., 20, 92–117.
5.
De GeorgeRT. 2006. The history of business ethics, in The accountable corporation, (eds. EpsteinM and HansonK), Westport, CT, Praeger, 47–58.
6.
De WaalAA and EscalanteGO. 2011. Does the application of corporate social responsibility support a high performance organisation in achieving better results? The case of mining multinationals in Peru, Int. J. Sustainable Strategic Manage., 3, 33–48.
7.
FreemanRE. 1984. Strategic management: a stakeholder approach, Boston, Pitman.
International Organization for Standardization (ISO). 2010. Guidance on social responsibility, ISO 26000:2010(E), Geneva, ISO.
12.
JenkinsH and YakovlevaN.2006. Corporate social responsibility in the mining industry: exploring trends in social and environmental disclosure, J Clean. Prod., 14, 271–284.
13.
KempD, OwenJr and Van De GraaffS.2011. Corporate social responsibility, mining and ‘audit culture’, J. Clean. Prod., 24, 1–10.
14.
MaranvilleSJ. 1989. You can't make steel without having some smoke: a case study in stakeholder analysis, J. Bus. Ethics, 8(1), 57–63.
15.
MattenD and CraneA.2005. Corporate citizenship: towards an extended theoretical conceptualization, Acad. Manage. Rev., 30, 166–179.
16.
MattenD and MoonJ.2008. ‘Implicit’ and ‘explicit’ CSR: a conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility, Acad. Manage. Rev., 33, 404–424.
17.
MuttiD, YakovlevaN, Vazquez-BrustD and Di MarcoMH. 2012. Corporate social responsibility in the mining industry: perspectives from stakeholder groups in Argentina, Resour. Policy, 37, 212–222.
18.
OkoliC and PawlowskiSD. 2004. The Delphi method as a research tool: an example, design considerations and applications, Inform. Manage., 42, 15–29.
19.
Prospectors and Developers Association of Canada (PDAC). 2012. The principles and guidance notes of e3 Plus: a framework for responsible exploration, Toronto, PDAC.
SaatyTL. 2008. Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process, Int. J. Serv. Sci., 1(1), 83–98.
22.
SchochetGJ. 1979. Social responsibility, profits, and the public interest, Society, 16, 20–26.
23.
SheldonO.1923. The philosophy of management, London, Sir Isaac Pitman & Sons.
24.
State-owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission of the State Council (SASAC). 2008. Guidelines for state-owned enterprises directly under the central government on fulfilling corporate social responsibilities, Beijing, SASAC.
25.
United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development (UNCSD). 2012. The future we want, Rio de Janeiro, United Nations.
VintroC and ComajuncosaJ.2010. Corporate social responsibility in the mining industries: criteria and indicators, Dyna-Colombia, 77, 31–41.
28.
WorrallR, NeilD, BreretonD and MulliganD.2009. Towards a sustainability criteria and indictors framework for legacy mine land, J. Clean. Prod., 17, 1426–1434.
29.
ZadekS.2004. The path to corporate responsibility, Harv. Bus. Rev., 82, 125–132.
30.
ZhuX, LiD and KomnitsasK.2007. Development of an indicator based revegetation SDSS in areas affected by mining activities, Proc. 3rd Int. Conf. on Sustainable Development Indicators in the Minerals Industry, Milos, Greece.
