The objective of this study was to identify a practical solution to mitigating over-stable froth problems in fine coal flotation in saline water. The effect of coal particle size, water quality and chemical reagents which can be manipulated in flotation plants, on the froth stability and coal flotation performance was investigated. It was found that froth stability was dependent on the coal particle size, the proportion of process water mixed with de-ionised water and the dosage of the collector or frother. Mixing coarse coal particles with fine coal, diluting process water, and reducing collector or frother dosage all significantly decreased the froth stability. However, only the reduction of reagent usage was recommended as a sound strategy since it did not negatively impact the coal flotation performance while eliminating the over-stable froth problems.
AktasZ, CilliersJ and BanfordA. 2008. Dynamic froth stability: particle size, airflow rate and conditioning time effects, Int. J. Miner. Process., 87, (1–2), 65–71.
2.
AtaS, AhmedN and JamesonG., 2003. A study of bubble coalescence in flotation froths, Int. J. Miner. Process., 72, (1–4), 255–266.
3.
BarbianN, CilliersJJ, MorarSH and BradshawDJ. 2007. Froth imaging, air recovery and bubble loading to describe flotation bank performance, Int. J. Miner. Process., 84, (1–4), 81–88.
4.
BarbianN, HadlerK, Ventura-MedinaE and CilliersJJ., 2005. The froth stability column: linking froth stability and flotation performance.Miner. Eng., 18, (3), 317–324.
5.
BıçakÖ, EkmekçiZ, CanM and ÖztürkY. 2012. The effect of water chemistry on froth stability and surface chemistry of the flotation of a Cu–Zn sulfide ore, Int. J. Miner. Process., 102–103, 32–37.
6.
ChoY and LaskowskiJ. 2002. Effect of flotation frothers on bubble size and foam stability, Int. J. Miner. Process., 64, (2–3), 69–80.
7.
CrosbieRV, RungeK, McmasterJK, RivettT and PeakerR. 2009. The impact of the froth zone on metallurgical performance in a 3 m3 flotation cell, Flotation ‘09. Cape Town.
8.
FarrokhpayS., 2011. The significance of froth stability in mineral flotation- a review, Adv. Colloid Interface Sci., 166, 1–7.
9.
FarrokhpayS and ZaninM. 2012a. An investigation into the effect of water quality on froth stability, Adv. Colloid Interface Sci., 23, (4), 493–497.
10.
FarrokhpayS and ZaninM., 2012b. Synergic effect of collector and frother on froth stability and flotation recovery – an industrial case, Proc. 11th Mill Operators’ Conf., 145–150, Hobart, The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy AusiMM.
11.
GuptaA, BanerjeeP, MishraA, SatishP and Pradip. 2007. Effect of alcohol and polyglycol ether frothers on foam stability, bubble size and coal flotation, Int. J. Miner. Process., 82, (3), 126–137.
12.
HartG, AttallaM and MorganP. 2006. Frother measurement and control, Australian Coal Association Research Program.
13.
JohanssonG and PughR. 1992. The influence of particle size and hydrophobicity on the stability of mineralized froths, Int. J. Miner. Process., 34, (1–2), 1–21.
14.
KurniawanAU, OzdemirO, NguyenAV, OforiP and FirthB. 2011. Flotation of coal particles in MgCl2, NaCl, and NaClO3 solutions in the absence and presence of Dowfroth 250, Int. J. Miner. Process., 98, 137–144.
15.
LiangY, HilalN, LangstonP and StarovV. 2007. Interaction forces between colloidal particles in liquid: theory and experiment, Adv. Colloid Interface Sci., 134–135, 151–166.
16.
MoxonN, BensleyC, Keast-JonesR and NicolS., 1987. Insoluble oils in coal flotation: The effects of surface spreading and pore penetration, Int. J. Miner. Process., 21, (3–4), 261–274.
17.
NaikP, ReddyP and MisraV. 2005. Interpretation of interaction effects and optimization of reagent dosages for fine coal flotation, Int. J. Miner. Process., 75, (1–2), 83–90.
18.
OforiP, FirthB, FranksG, NguyenA and JamesonG. 2005. Impact of saline water on coal flotation, ACARP Project Report, Australian Coal Association Research Program.
19.
PetukhovV. 1995. Conditioning of coal for froth flotation with kerosine collector, Fuel Energy Abstr., 36, (4), 245.
20.
PolatM, PolatH and ChanderS., 2003. Physical and chemical interactions in coal flotation, Int. J. Miner. Process., 72, (1–4), 199–213.
21.
PughR., 2005. Experimental techniques for studying the structure of foams and froths, Adv. Colloid Interface Sci., 114–115, 239–251.
22.
QuX, WangL and NguyenA. 2013. Correlation of air recovery with froth stability and separation efficiency in coal flotation, Miner. Eng., 41, 25–30.
23.
QuinnJ, KrachtW, GomezC, GagnonC and FinchJ. 2007. Comparing the effect of salts and frother (MIBC) on gas dispersion and froth properties, Miner. Eng., 20, (14), 1296–1302.
24.
RattanakawinC and HoggR. 2000. Aggregate size distributions in flocculation, Colloids Surf., 177, (2–3), 87–98.
25.
SönmezI and CebeciY. 2006. Performance of classic oils and lubricating oils in froth flotation of Ukraine coal, Fuel, 85, (12–13), 1866–1870.
26.
TangF, XiaoZ, TangJ and JiangL. 1989. The effect of SiO2 particles upon stabilization of foam, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 131, (2), 498–502.
27.
WangB and PengY., 2013. The behaviour of mineral matter in fine coal flotation using saline water, Fuel, 109, 309–315.
28.
WarrenL., 1985. Determination of the contributions of true flotation and entrainment in batch flotation tests, Int. J. Miner. Process., 14, (1), 33–44.
29.
WashburnE., 1921. The dynamics of capillary flow, Phys. Rev., 17, (3), 273–283.
30.
WieseJ, HarrisP and BradshawD. 2011. The effect of the reagent suite on froth stability in laboratory scale batch flotation tests, Miner. Eng., 24, (9), 995–1003.
31.
YianatosJ, BerghL, PinoC, VinnettL, MuñozC and YañezA. 2012. Industrial evaluation of a new flotation mechanism for large flotation cells, Miner. Eng., 36–38, 262–271.
