Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Analysis of several nickel mattes from around the world shows a significant variation in their nickel and copper content. Typically, matte contains an alloy, heazlewoodite (Ni₃S₂) and a copper sulphide phase. The various commercial methods of processing these mattes are reviewed and some of the fundamental factors that determine the choice of leaching system are discussed. Electrochemical studies on pure heazlewoodite and millerite (NiS) in sulphate and chloride media are compared which show that nickel sulphides react via a series of nickel deficient sulphides and exhibit passivation as nickel is removed. The electrochemistry of mattes differs owing to the presence of alloy and copper. Copper in the matte modifies the potential for alloy dissolution and the rate of anodic dissolution of nickel. Differences in the electrochemical behaviour of matte in chloride media relative to sulphate media are attributed to greater crystallinity of sulphur and less formation of intermediate NiS₂ which oxidises to form thiosulphate and sulphate in solution. At elevated temperatures, Cu(II) in solution exchanges with NiS and completes the leaching of nickel at relatively low potentials without significant oxidation of sulphur to sulphate. It is concluded that there are fundamental advantages to leaching nickel sulphides and nickel matte in the presence of Cu(II) and chloride ion to minimise the production of sulphate ion via NiS₂ formation.

Keywords

NICKEL SULPHIDES NICKEL MATTE PROCESSING ELECTROCHEMISTRY SULPHATE CHLORIDE

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Berezowsky

R. M.

: Paper presented 129th Ann. Meet. Exhib., Nashville, TN, USA, March 2000, TMS.

Burkin

A. R.

: in ‘Critical reports on applied chemistry’, (ed. Burkin

A. R.

), Vol. 17, 98–146; 1987, Chichester, John Wiley & Sons.

Segnit

E. R.

: Proc. Australas. Inst. Min. Metall., 1977, 263, 15–18.

Kellerud

, Yund

R. A.

and Moh

G. H.

: Econ. Geol. Monogr., 1969, 4, 323–343.

Stensholt

E. O.

, Zachariasen

and Lund

J. H.

: Trans. Inst. Min. Metall. C, 1986, 95C, 10–160.

Makino

and Tsuchida

: Proc. AusIMM Annual Conference, Perth, WA, Australia, March 1996, Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, 139–144.

Brugman

C. F.

and Kerfoot

D. G. E.

: Proc. Nickel Metall. Symp., Vol. 1: ‘Extraction and refining of nickel’, (ed. Ozberk

and Marcusson

S. W.

), 512–531; 1986, Montreal, Canadian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy.

Nakazawa

, Suetsuna

and Shimogawara

: Paper presented AIME Ann. Meet., Chicago, IL, USA, 1973.

Anon: ‘New nickel technology from Outokumpu’, Outokumpu news, Outokumpu Harjavalta Metals Ltd, Harjavalta, Finland, 1995.

10.

Stensholt

E. O.

, Zachariasen

, Lund

J. H.

and Thornhill

P. G.

: in ‘Extractive metallurgy of nickel and cobalt’, (ed. Tyroler

G. P.

and Landolt

C. A.

), 403–412; 1988, Warrendale, PA, The Metallurgical Society.

11.

Ishikawa

, Tsuchida

, Sugiura

and Esaki

: in ‘EPD Congress 1992’, (ed. Hager

J. P.

), 713–727; 1992, Warrendale, PA, TMS.

12.

Pittie

W. H.

and Doig

K. F.

: Proc. Int. Symp. on ‘Chloride hydrometallurgy’, 202–208; 1977, Brussels, Benelux Metallurgic.

13.

Hougen

L. R.

and Zachariasen

: J. Met., 1975, 27, (5), 6–9.

14.

Berezowsky

R. M. G. S.

, Collins

M. J.

, Kerfoot

D. G. E.

and Torres

: J. Met., February 1991, 9-1 5.

15.

Kellerud

and Yund

R. A.

: J. PetroL, 1962, 3, (1), 126–175.

16.

Lin

R. Y.

, Hu

D. C.

and Chang

Y. A.

: Metall Trans. B, 1978, 9B, 531–538.

17.

Remy

: ‘Treatise on inorganic chemistry’, Vol. 2; 1956, Amsterdam, Elsevier Publishing Company.

18.

Jiang

, Shu

and Zhang

: Zhongnan Kuangye Xueyuan Xuebao, 1986, 4, 100—109.

19.

Ghali

, Meric

and Deroo

: J. Appl. Electrochem., 1981, 11, 153—163.

20.

Power

G. P.

: Electrochim. Acta, 1982, 27, (3), 359–364.

21.

Kato

and Oki

: Nippon Kinzoku Gakkaishi, 1973, 37, (12), 1338–1343.

22.

Buckley

A. N.

and Woods

: J. Appt Electrochem., 1991, 21, (7), 575–582.

23.

Qin

, Zhao

, Jiang

and Fu

: J. Centr. South Inst. Min. Metall., 1992, 23, (5), 609–614.

24.

Natorkhin

M. I.

: Russ. J. Appt Chem., 2001, 74, (1), 51–54.

25.

Natorkhin

M. I.

: Russ. J. Appt Chem., 2002, 75, (5), 849–851.

26.

Price

D. C.

and Davenport

W. G.

: J. Appl. Electrochem., 1982, 12, 281–290.

27.

Hofirek

and Kerfoot

D. G. E.

: Hydrometallurgy, 1992, 29, 357–381.

28.

Thu

, Li

and Wadsworth

M. E.

: Proc. AIME Ann. Conf., Las Vegas, NV, USA, February 1995, AIME.

29.

Zhou

, Li

, Wadsworth

and Woods

: in ‘Hydrometallurgy and refining of nickel and cobalt’, (ed. Cooper

W. C.

and Mihaylov

), Vol. 1, 153–167; 1997, Montreal, Canadian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy.

30.

Fang

and Chen

: Proc. 1st Int. Conf. on ‘Hydrometallurgy’, (ed. Zheng

and Xu

), 614–617; 1988, Oxford, International Academic Publishers, Pergamon Press

31.

Cao

and Fang

: Huagong Yejin, 1990, 11, (3), 236–241.

32.

Zhou

, Tang

and Liu

: Zhongnan Kuangye Xueyuan Xuebao, 1987, 18, (3), 275–280.

33.

: ‘An electrochemical study of reactions of nickel matte in acid media’, PhD thesis, Murdoch University, Perth, WA, Australia, 1997.

34.

Jha

M. C.

, Carlberg

J. R.

and Meyer

G. A.

: Hydrometallurgy, 1983, 9, 349—369.

35.

Power

G. P.

: Aust. J. Chem., 1981, 34, 2287–2296.

36.

Ghali

, Maruejouls

and Deroo

: J. Appt Electrochem., 1980, 10, 709–719.

37.

Cheng

C. Y.

and Lawson

: Hydrometallurgy, 1991, 27, 249–268.

38.

Nicol

M. J.

: Proc. Int. Symp. on ‘Electrochemistry in mineral and metal processing’, (ed. Richardson

P. E.

et al), 152–168; 1984, Pennington, NJ, The Electrochemical Society.

39.

Chen

, Fu

and Zheng

: Zhongnan Kuangye Xueyuan Xuebao, 1992, 23, (2), 163–167.

40.

Hubli

R. C.

, Mukherjee

T. K.

, Venkatachalam

, Bautista

R. G.

and Gupta

C. K.

: Hydrometallurgy, 1995, 38, 149–159.

41.

Liu

, Yang

, He

, Chen

and Li

: Scand. J. Metall., 1996, 25, 199–203.

42.

Inami

, Tsuchida

, Tomoda

and Shigemura

: in ‘Nickel metallurgy’, (ed. Ozberk

and S

S. W.

), Vol. 1; 1986, Montreal, Canadian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy.

43.

Yang

, Jiang

, Bingkun

and Xi

: J Centr. South Inst. Min. Metall, 1989, 20, (4), 459.

44.

Biegler

and Swift

D. A.

: Hydrometallurgy, 1977, 2, 335–349.

45.

Subrahmanyam

D. V.

and Ghali

E. L.

: J. Appl. Electrochem., 1978, 8, 313—326.

46.

Rademan

J. A. M.

, Lorenzen

and van Deventer

J. S. J.

: Hydrometallurgy, 1999, 52, 231–252.

47.

Provis

J. L.

, van Deventer

J. S. L.

, Rademan

J. A. M.

and Lorenzen

: Hydrometallurgy, 2003, 70, 83–99.

48.

Subramanian

K. N.

and Ferrajuolo

: Hydrometallurgy, 1976, 2, 117–125.

49.

Jones

: ‘Process for the recovery of nickel and/or cobalt from an ore or concentrate’, US Patent 5, 855, 858, 1999.

50.

Jones

: Proc. ALTA ‘98 Nickel-Cobalt Pressure Leaching and Hydrometallurgy Forum, Perth, WA, Australia, 1998, JoAl Enterprises.

51.

Kerfoot

D. G. E.

and Krause

: ‘Recovery of nickel and cobalt values from a sulfidic flotation concentrate by chloride assisted oxidative pressure leaching in sulfuric acid’, WO 02/24966 Al, International Patent Application, 2002.

Process review and electrochemistry of nickel sulphides and nickel mattes in acidic sulphate and chloride media

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References