The effect of electropulsing assisted ultrasonic impact treatment (EUIT) on the mechanical properties and microstructure evolution of S50C steel welded components has been investigated. The present paper presents the application of a relatively new post-weld treatment method to eliminate the residual stress and improve the surface mechanical properties. The results show that EUIT exhibits better surface modification capability than does conventional ultrasonic impact treatment. After EUIT, plastic deformation layer with strengthened grains formed on the sample surface, and residual tensile stress was converted into residual compressive stress.
WithersP. J. and BhadeshiaH. K. D. H.: ‘Residual stress. Part 2 – nature and origins’, Mater. Sci. Technol., 2001, 17, (10), 336–397.
2.
LuJ., LuoK., ZhangY., CuiC., SunG., ZhouJ., ZhangL., YouJ., ChenK. and ZhongJ.: ‘Grain refinement of LY2 aluminum alloy induced by ultra-high plastic strain during multiple laser shock processing impacts’, Acta Mater., 2010, 58, (11), 3984–3994.
3.
LuJ., ZhongJ., LuoK., ZhangL., DaiF., ChenK., WangQ., ZhongJ. and ZhangY.: ‘Micro-structural strengthening mechanism of multiple laser shock processing impacts on AISI 8620 steel’, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2011, A528, (19), 6128–6133.
4.
ChoI. H., SongG. H., KimC. S., NobuhideA., CombsA., ParkJ., SuhC. M., ParkJ. H. and PyounY. S.: ‘Nano structured surface modification of tool steel and its beneficial effects in mechanical properties’, J. Mech. Sci. Technol., 2005, 19, (11), 2151–2156.
5.
LiaoM., ChenW. and BellingerN.: ‘Effects of ultrasonic impact treatment on fatigue behavior of naturally exfoliated aluminum alloys’, Int. J. Fatigue, 2008, 30, (4), 717–726.
6.
GolikovN. and SidorovM.: ‘Redistribution of residual welding stresses in ultrasound impact treatment of welded joints in pipes’, Weld. Int., 2012, 26, (10), 765–768.
7.
GaoH., DuttaR. K., HuizengaR. M., AmirthalingamM., HermansM. J. M., BuslapsT. and RichardsonI. M.: ‘Stress relaxation due to ultrasonic impact treatment on multi-pass welds’, Sci. Technol. Weld. Join., 2014, 19, (6), 505–513.
8.
AnX., RodopoulosC., StatnikovE., VitazevV. and KorolkovO.: ‘Study of the surface nanocrystallization induced by the esonix ultrasonic impact treatment on the near-surface of 2024-T351 aluminum alloy’, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2006, 15, (3), 355–364.
9.
WuB., WangP., PyounY.-S., ZhangJ. and MurakamiR.-I.: ‘Effect of ultrasonic nanocrystal surface modification on the fatigue behaviors of plasma-nitrided S45C steel’, Surf. Coat. Technol., 2012, 213, 271–277.
10.
CaoX., PyounY. and MurakamiR.: ‘Fatigue properties of a S45C steel subjected to ultrasonic nanocrystal surface modification’, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2010, 256, (21), 6297–6303.
11.
RoyS., FisherJ. W. and YenB. T.: ‘Fatigue resistance of welded details enhanced by ultrasonic impact treatment (UIT)’, Int. J. Fatigue, 2003, 25, (9), 1239–1247.
12.
YasuokaM., WangP., ZhangK., QiuZ., KusakaK., PyounY.-S. and MurakamiR.-I.: ‘Improvement of the fatigue strength of SUS304 austenite stainless steel using ultrasonic nanocrystal surface modification’, Surf. Coat. Technol., 2013, 218, 93–98.
13.
YangX., ZhouJ. and LingX.: ‘Study on plastic damage of AISI 304 stainless steel induced by ultrasonic impact treatment’, Mater. Des., 2012, 36, 477–481.
14.
WuB., WangP., PyounY.-S., ZhangJ. and MurakamiR.-I.: ‘Study on the fatigue properties of plasma nitriding S45C with a pre-ultrasonic nanocrystal surface modification process’, Surf. Coat. Technol., 2013, 216, 191–198.
15.
JiangY., GuanL., TangG., ShekC. and ZhangZ.: ‘Influence of electropulsing treatment on microstructure and mechanical properties of cold-rolled Mg-9Al-1Zn alloy strip’, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2011, A528, (16), 5627–5635.
16.
JiangY., TangG., ShekC., XieJ., XuZ. and ZhangZ.: ‘Mechanism of electropulsing induced recrystallization in a cold-rolled Mg-9Al-1Zn alloy’, J. Alloys Compd, 2012, 536, 94–105.
17.
ZhuR., TangG., ShiS. and FuM.: ‘Effect of electroplastic rolling on deformability and oxidation of NiTiNb shape memory alloy’, J. Mater. Process. Technol., 2013, 213, (1), 30–35.
18.
KuangJ., LiX., YeX., TangJ., LiuH., WangJ. and TangG.: ‘Microstructure and texture evolution of magnesium alloys during electropulse treatment’, Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 2015, 46A, (4), 1789–1804.
19.
LevitinV. and LoskutovS.: ‘The effect of a current pulse on the fatigue of titanium alloy’, Solid State Commun., 2004, 131, (3), 181–183.
20.
YeX., YeY. and TangG.: ‘Effect of electropulsing treatment and ultrasonic striking treatment on the mechanical properties and microstructure of biomedical Ti-6Al-4V alloy’, J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater., 2014, 40, 287–296.
21.
YeX., LiuT., YeY., WangH., TangG. and SongG.: ‘Enhanced grain refinement and microhardness of Ti-Al-V alloy by electropulsing ultrasonic shock’, J. Alloys Compd, 2015, 621, 66–70.
22.
WithersP. J., TurskiM., EdwardsL., BouchardP. J. and ButtleD. J.: ‘Recent advances in residual stress measurement’, Int. J. Pres. Ves. Pip., 2008, 85, (3), 118–127.
RossiniN. S., DassistiM., BenyounisK. Y. and OlabiA. G.: ‘Methods of measuring residual stresses in components’, Mater. Des., 2012, 35, 572–588.
25.
MartinsC. O. D.: ‘Application of X-ray diffraction, micromagnetic and hole drilling methods for residual stress determination in a ball bearing steel ring’, Exp. Mech., 2005, 45, (4), 344–350.
SantusC., BertiniL. and BeghiniM.: ‘A procedure for evaluating high residual stresses using the blind hole drilling method, including the effect of plasticity’, J. Strain Anal. Eng. Des., 2010, 45, (4), 301–318.
