The use of neutrons has extended the technique of diffraction strain measurement from an essentially two-dimensional, near-surface tool using X-rays to a true three-dimensional method. The depth scale has gone from micrometres to millimetres. This initially gave rise to subsurface measurements of type I residual macrostresses in weldments and type II residual microstresses in anisotropic and multiphase metals, and composites. Soon the possibilities of in situ applied stress measurements became apparent and today they represent a significant portion of the work being carried out. This perspective focuses on the current state of the art, the prospects and developments necessary for further progress. The transition from two- to three-dimensions raised the issues of stress free reference values, methodology for general tensor measurements, beam optics and experimental design. Workers invested great effort in resolving these issues. In addition, the development of pulsed source instruments has enabled in situ measurements of slip, fatigue, load partitioning, twinning, high T stress-strain response, thermal cycling and the shape memory effect. Most recently, the SNS instrument, VULCAN, has introduced torsion and continuous recording of data which can later be binned in the shortest statistically significant time intervals.
LesterH. H. and AbornR. M.: Army Ordnance, 1925–26, 6, 120, 200, 283, 364.
3.
NagyP. B.: AIP, 2006, 820. 22–40.
4.
HutchingsM. T., WithersP. J., HoldenT. M. and LorentzenT.: ‘Introduction to the characterization of residual by neutron diffraction’; 2005, Boca Raton, FL, CRC Taylor & Krancis.
5.
PraskH. J., ChoiC. S., AlperinH. A. and PrinceE.: in ‘NBS reactor: summary of activities July 1976 to June 1977’, Technical note 969, NBS, Gaithcrsburg, MD, USA, 1978, 73–76.
6.
KrawitzA. D., BruneJ. E. and SchmankM. J.: in ‘Residual stress and stress relaxation’, (ed. KulaE. and WeissV.), 139–155; 1982, New York, Plenum Press.
7.
PintschoviusL., JungV., MacherauchE., SchaferR. and VohringerO.: in ‘Residual stress and stress relaxation’, (ed. KulaE. and WeissV.), 467–482; 1982, New York, Plenum Press.
8.
AllenA. J., AndreaniC., HutchingsM. T. and WindsorC. G.: NOT Int., 1981, 14, 249–254.
9.
‘The measurement of residual and applied stress using neutron diffraction’, (ed. HutchingsM. T. and KrawitzA. D.); 1992, London, Kluwer Academic Publishers.
10.
‘Polycrystalline materials—determination of residual stresses by neutron diffraction’, ISO/TTA 3:2001 (E), 2001.
11.
KrawitzA. D.: J. Neutron Res., 2001, 119–127.
12.
RoggeR. B.: Proc. 16th Int. Offshore and Polar Engineering Conf., San Francisco, CA, USA, May-June 2006, OMAE, Vol. 4, 18–24.
13.
GharghouiM. A.: Proc. 10th Int. Conf. on ‘Aluminium alloys’, Mater. Sci. Forum, 2006, 519–526, 1379–1384.
14.
RoganteM.: Rivista Italiana delia Saldatura, 2009, 61, 39–47.
15.
RoganteM.: Oil Gas J., 2005; 103, 36.
16.
RoggeR. B., RootJ. H. and DonabergerR. L.: Physica B, 2006. 385–386B, 883–889.
17.
WithersP. J.: CR Phys., 2007, 8, 806–820.
18.
SchaferW.: Eur. J. Miner., 2002; 14, (2), 263–289.
19.
DaymondM. R.: Rev. Miner. Geochem., 2006, 63, 427–458.
20.
ReimersW., PyzallaA., SchreyerA. and ClemensH. (eds.): ‘Neutrons and synchrotron radiation in engineering materials science: from fundamentals to material and component characterization’; 2008, Weinhem, Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH.
21.
KrawitzA. D.: ‘Introduction to diffraction in materials science and engineering’, 278–318; 2001, New York, John Wiley.
22.
KislE. H. and HowardC. J.: ‘Applications of neutron powder diffraction’; 2008, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
23.
NoyanI. C. and CohenJ. B.: ‘Residual stress: measurement by diffraction and interpretation’; 1987, New York, Springer-Verlag.
24.
HaukV. (ed.); ‘Structural and residual stress analysis by nondestructive methods: evaluation, application, assessment’; 1997, Amsterdam, Elsevier Science.
25.
FitzpatrickM. E. and LodiniA. (eds.): ‘Analysis of residual stress by diffraction using neutron and synchrotron radiation’; 2003, London, Taylor & Francis.
26.
LodiniA. and BaudinT. (eds.): ‘Analyse des contraintes par diffraction des neutrons et du rayonnement synchrotron application aux matériaux texturés’, EDP Sciences, to be published.
27.
MacEwenS. R., FaberJ.Jr and TurnerA. P. L.: Acta Metall., 1983, 31, 657–676.
28.
WithersP. J., JohnsonM. W. and WrightJ. S.: Physica B, 2000, 292B, 273–285.
29.
KrawitzA. D. and WinholtzR. A.: Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 1994, A185, 123–130.
30.
ParadowskaA., FinlaysonT. R., PriceJ. W. H., IbrahimR.. SteuwerA. and RipleyM.: Physica B, 2006, 385–386B, 904–907.
31.
SuzukiH., MoriaiA., MinakawaN. and MoriiY.: J. Soc. Mater. Sci., 2005, 54, 339–345.
32.
HoldenT. M., SuzukiH. and CarrD. G.: ISIJ Int., 2006, 46, 959–965.
33.
WiederT.: J. Struct. Geol., 2000. 22, 1601–1607.
34.
DaymondM. R. and JohnsonM. W.: J. Appl. Cryst., 2001, 34. 263–270.
35.
WithersP. J., PreussM.. SteuwerA. and PangJ. W. L.: J. Appl. Cryst., 2007, 40, 891904.
36.
RoganteM.: Physica B, 2000, 276–278B, 202–203.
37.
HughesD. J., JamesM. N., HattinghD. G. and WebsterP. J.: J. Neutron Res., 2003, 11, 289–293.
38.
PaggettJ. W., KrawitzA. D., DrakeE. F., BourkeM. A. M., ClausenB. and BrownD. W.: Metall. Trans. A, 2007, 38A, 1638–1648.
39.
WinholtzR. A. and KrawitzA. D.: Metall Trans. A, 1995, 26A, 1287–1295.
40.
WinholtzR. A. and KrawitzA. D.: Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 1996, A205, 257–258.
41.
XiongY.-S. and WithersP. J.: J. Appl. Cryst., 2006, 39, 410424.
42.
TomotaY., LukasP., NeovD., HarjoS. and AbeY. R.: Acta Mater., 2003, 51, 805–817.
43.
StrunzP., LukasP. and NeovD.: J. Neutr. Res., 2001, 9, 99–106.
