Comparative analysis of the resource classification techniques: Case study of the Conceição Mine,Brazil

Abstract

The major international codes recognise that resource classification involves the interaction of numerous qualitative and quantitative criteria. However, the difficulty in quantifying the degree of uncertainty associated with the estimation of mineral resources has led to the creation of a large suite of methods, terms, and definitions, with almost every mining company having its own set of standards. Traditional methods used to evaluate resources, such as, the number of samples used to interpolate a block, or the position of samples surrounding this block, do not take into account the spatial continuity of the grades; and some approaches based on geostatistical methods are unable to provide a measure of the error associated with their estimates. Because they do not provide an error assessment, these methods are inappropriate to assess the local or global uncertainty associated with an estimate. Posed with these problems, some of the widely applied techniques for mineral resource classification were assembled in a software package, and a comparative study was conducted at the Conceiçaão Mine (Iron Ore Quadrangle, Brazil), allowing a comparison among the parameters affecting mineral inventory assessment. The results showed the specific limitations of each classification system, the influence in selecting their key parameters, and the empirical nature of the traditional methods that are mainly subjective.

Keywords

MINERAL RESOURCES GEOSTATISTICS RISK ASSESSMENT

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Annels

A. E

. 1991. Mineral deposit evaluation: a practical approach, London, Chapman & Hall.

Annels

A. E

. 1996. Ore reserves: errors and classification, AppL Earth Sci. (Trans. Inst. Min. MetalL A), 105, A150—A156.

Arik

. 1999. An alternative approach to resource classification, Proc. 28th Int. Symp. on ‘Computer applications in the mineral industries', 45–53, Golden, CO, Colorado School of Mines.

Armstrong

. 1998. Basic linear geostatistics, Berlin, Springer.

AusIMM. 1999. Australasian code for reporting of mineral resources and ore reserves — The JORC code, Joint Ore Reserves Committee of The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, Australian Institute of Geoscientists and Minerals Council of Australia, http://www.jorc.org

Camisani-Calzolari

F. A.

, Krige

D. J.

and Dixon

J. R.

2000. The South African code for reporting of mineral resources and mineral reserves and the geostatistical implications involved, Proc. 6th Int. Geostat. Cong., Cape Town, South Africa, April, CD-ROM.

Camisani-Calzolari

F. A.

and Krige

D. J.

2001. The SAMREC code seen in a global context, Proc. 29th Int. Symp. on ‘Computer applications in the mineral industries', Beijing, China, April, 39–44, A. A. Balkema.

CIM. 2000. Resource and reserve definitions: CIM standards on mineral resources and reserves — definitions and guidelines, Can. Min. MetalL Bull. (CIM Standing Committee on Reserve Definitions), 93, (1044), 53–61.

David

. 1988. Handbook of applied advanced geostatistical ore reserve estimation, in Developments in geomathematics 6, Amsterdam, Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company.

10.

Deutsch

C. V

. 1996. Correcting for negative weights in ordinary Kriging, Comput. Geosci, 22, (7), 765–773.

11.

Deutsch

C. V.

and Journel

A. G

. 1998. GSLIB: geostatistical software library and user's guide, New York, Oxford University Press.

12.

De-Vitry

. 2003. Resource classification — a case study from the Joffre-Hosted iron ore of BHP Billiton's Mount whaleback operations, Appl. Earth Sci. (Trans. Inst. Min. Metall. A), 112, A185—A196.

13.

Dowd

P. A

. 1999. Reserves and resources — continuity and levels of confidence, Proc. 28th Int. Symp. on ‘Computer applications in the mineral industries', 93–99, Golden, CO, Colorado School of Mines.

14.

Goovaerts

. 1997. Geostatistics for natural resources evaluation, New York, Oxford University Press.

15.

Guimardes

M. L. V.

, Toledo

J. P.

and Faria

C. A.

2004. Estimativa e Monitoramento das Reservas de Minério de Ferro do Sistema Sul - CVRD — Quadrilatero Ferrifero — MG, Proc. III Cong. Brasileiro de Mina a Céu Aberto/III Cong. Brasileiro de Mina Subterranea, Belo Horizonte, Instituto Brasileiro de Mineração.

16.

Heuveling

G. B. M.

and Pebesma

E. J.

2002. Is the ordinary Kriging variance a proper measure of interpolation error?, Proc. 5th Int. Symp. of Spatial Accuracy Assessment in Natural Resources and Environmental Sciences, 179–186, Melbourne, RMIT University.

17.

IMM. 2001. Code for reporting of mineral exploration results, mineral resources and mineral reserves (the reporting code), Institution of Mining and Metallurgy, European Federation of Geologists and The Institute of Geologists of Ireland, http://www.imm.org.uk/rescode/reportingcode.doc. Accessed at http://www.eurogeologists.de/images/content/panels_ofexperts/minerals_and_their_sustainable_use/reporting_code.pdf.

18.

Isaaks

E. H.

and Srivastava

M. R

. 1989. An introduction to applied geostatistics, New York, Oxford University Press.

19.

Journel

A. G

. 1986. Geostatistics: models and tools for the earth sciences, Math Geol., 18, (1), 119–140.

20.

Matheron

. 1963. Principles of geostatistics, Econ. Geol., 58, 1246–1266.

21.

Mwasinga

P. P

. 2001. Approaching resource classification: general practices and the integration, Proc. 29th Int. Symp. on ‘Computer applications in the mineral industries', Beijing, China, April, 97–104, A. A. Balkema.

Sage UK: London, England

22.

Phillips

. 2000. The liability of company directors and competent persons for resource/reserve disclosure, in The Codes Forum, Mineral Industry Consultants Association (MICA), Sydney, Australia, http://www.mica.org.au/pdf/phillipsl.pdf

23.

Rendu

J. M

. 2000. International aspects of resource and reserve reporting standards, in The Codes Forum, Mineral Industry Consultants Association (MICA), Sydney, Australia, http://www.mica.org.au/pdf/rendul.pdf

24.

Rivoirard

. 1987. Two key parameters when choosing the kriging neighbourhood, Math GeoL, 19, (8), 851–856.

25.

Rossi

M. E

. 2005. Indicator simulations of categorical variables, Proc. 32nd Int. Symp. on ‘Computer applications in the mineral industries', Tucson AZ, USA, March—April, EUA, 247–252.

26.

SAMREC. 2000. South African code for reporting of mineral resources and mineral reserves (The SAMREC Code), The South African Mineral Resource Committee (SAMREC) and South African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, http://www.saimm.co.za/links/reporting-codes.

27.

Shaw

W. J.

, Godoy

M. C.

and Larrondo

. 2006. An approach to more objective classification of mineral resources, Proc. 6th Int. Min. Geol. Conf., 85–89, Darwin, Australian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy.

28.

Sinclair

A. J

. and Vallée

1998. Preface — quality assurance, continuous quality improvement and standards in mineral resource estimation, Explor. Min. Geol., special ed., 7, (1–2), iii—v.

29.

Sinclair

A. J.

and Blackwell

G. H

. 2002. Applied mineral inventory estimation, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

30.

Souza

L. E.

, Gambin

, Costa

J. F. C. L.

and Koppe

J. C.

2001. Estimativa de Incerteza na Classificação de Recursos Minerais por Simulação Geoestatistica, Revista Escola de Minas (Revista Tecnica-Cientifica Minero-Metalfirgica), 54, (2), 143–148.

31.

Souza

L. E.

, Costa

J. F. C. L.

and Koppe

J. C.

2002. A geostatistical contribution to the use of resource/reserves classification systems, Proc. 30th Int. Symp. on ‘Computer applications in the mineral industries', 73–84, Phoenix AZ, USA, February, Society for Mining Metallurgy and Exploration.

32.

Souza

L. E.

, Costa

J. F. C. L.

and Koppe

J. C.

2004. Uncertainty estimate in resource assessment: a geostatistical contribution, Nat. Resour. Res., 13, (1), 1–15.

33.

Stephenson

P. R

. 2000a. The JORC code — its operation and application, Mineral Industry Consultants Association (MICA), in The Codes Forum, Sydney, Australia, http://www.mica.org.au/pdf/stephensonl.pdf

34.

Stephenson

P. R

. 2000b. The 1999 JORC code and the mining professional, Proc. 4th Int. Min. Geol. Conf., Coolum, Queensland, Australia, May, The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, http://wwwjorc.org/pdf/stephenson2.pdf

35.

Stephenson

P. R.

and Vann

. 2001. Common sense and good communication in mineral resource and ore reserve estimation, mineral resource and ore reserve estimation, in The AusIMM guide to good practice, 13–20, Melbourne, The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy.

36.

Stone

J. G.

and Dunn

P. G

. 1996. Ore reserve estimates in the real world, 2nd edn, Littleton, Society of Economic Geologists.

37.

Vallée

. 1999a. Toward resource/reserve estimation, inventory and reporting standards, Proc. 28th Int. Symp. on ‘Computer applications in the mineral industries', 69–76, Golden, Colorado School of Mines.

38.

Vallée

. 1999b. Resource/reserve inventories: what are the objec-tives?, Can. Min. MetalL Bull., 92, (1031), 151–155.

39.

Vann

, Jackson

and Bertoli

. 2003. Quantitative Kriging neighbourhood analysis for the mining geologist — a description of the method with worked case examples, Proc. 5th Int. Min. Geol. Conf., Bendigo, The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, 1–9.

40.

Weatherstone

. 2000. Rio Tinto's adoption of the JORC code as a world reporting standard, Mineral Industry Consultants Association (MICA), in The Codes Forum, Sydney, Australia, http://www.mica.org.au/pdf/weatherstonel.pdf

Sage UK: London, England

41.

Yamamoto

J. K

. 1999. Quantification of uncertainty in ore reserve estimation: applications to Chapada copper deposit, State of Goias, Brazil, Nat. Resour. Res., 8, (2), 153–163.