National Energy Board of Canada: ‘Focus on safety and environment - A comparative analysis of pipeline performance, 2000-2009’Calgary, AB, Canada; 2011.
2.
Alberta Energy Regulator: ‘Pipeline performance in Alberta, 1990-2012’Report 2013-B, Calgary, AB, Canada; 2013.
3.
National Transportation Safety Board: ‘Enbridge Incorporated-hazardous liquid pipeline rupture and release, Marshall, Michigan, July 25, 2010’Accident Report, NTSB/PAR-12/01, Washington D.C., USA; 2012.
4.
Energy Resources Conservation Board of Canada: ‘Plains Midstream Canada ULC, NPS 20 rainbow pipeline failure, April 28, 2011’ERCB Investigation Report, Calgary, AB, Canada; 2013.
5.
National Academy of Sciences: ‘Effects of diluted bitumen on crude oil transmission pipelines’Transportation Research Board (TRB) Special Report 311, Washington D.C., USA; 2013.
6.
National Energy Board of Canada: ‘Considerations-Report of the joint review panel for the Enbridge Northern Gateway project’Volume 2, Calgary, AB, Canada; 2013.
7.
EckertR. B.: ‘Emphasis on biofilms can improve mitigation of microbiologically influenced corrosion in oil and gas industry’Cor. Eng. Sci. Technol., 201550, (3), 163–168.
8.
HuangX. S.QiY. M.ChenC. F.YuH. B. and LuG. W.: ‘Effect of environmental factors on corrosion behaviour of L360QCS pipeline steel in H2S/CO2 environments’Cor. Eng. Sci. Technol., 201550, (3), 169–177.
9.
EliyanF. F. and AlfantaziA.: ‘Effect of bicarbonate concentration on corrosion of high strength steel’Cor. Eng. Sci. Technol., 201550, (3), 178–185.
10.
LuB-L.ZengY.PangX. and LuoJ. -L.: ‘Effects on Hydrogen and Tensile Stress on Passivity of Carbon Steel’Cor. Eng. Sci. Technol., 201550, (3), 186–190.
ShirbandZ.EadieR. L.ChenW.LuoJ. L.KaniaR.BeenJ. and BovenG. V.: ‘Developing prepitting procedure for near neutral pH stress corrosion crack initiation studies on X-52 pipeline steel’Cor. Eng. Sci. Technol., 201550, (3), 196–202.
14.
FumagalliG.BolzoniF.FallahmohammadiE.ReG. and LazzariL.: ‘Electrochemical methods for determining diffusion coefficient of hydrogen in steels’Cor. Eng. Sci. Technol., 201550, (3), 203–210.
15.
KuangD. and ChengY. F.: ‘Effect of alternating current interference on coating disbondment and cathodic protection shielding on pipelines’Cor. Eng. Sci. Technol., 201550, (3), 211–217.
16.
LiX. and CastanedaH.: ‘Coating studies of buried pipe in soil by novel approach of electrochemical impedance spectroscopy at wide frequency domain’Cor. Eng. Sci. Technol., 201550, (3), 218–225.
17.
VarelaF.TanM. Y. and ForsythM.: ‘An overview of major methods for inspecting and monitoring external corrosion of on-shore transportation pipelines’Cor. Eng. Sci. Technol., 201550, (3), 226–235.
18.
KochG.AyelloF.KhareV.SridharN. and MoosaviA.: ‘Corrosion threat assessment of crude oil flow lines using Bayesian network models’Cor. Eng. Sci. Technol., 201550, (3), 236–247.
19.
CuiZ. -Y.WangL. -W.LiuZ. -Y.DuC. -W. and LiX. -G.: ‘Influence of alternating voltages on the passivation and corrosion properties of X80 pipeline steel in high pH 0.5 mol/L NaHCO3+0.25 mol/L Na2CO3 solution’Cor. Eng. Sci. Technol., 201550, (3), 248–257.
20.
LuM. -X.TangD. -Z.DuY. -X. and ZhangL.: ‘Investigation on corrosion of zinc ribbon under alternating current’Cor. Eng. Sci. Technol., 201550, (3), 258–265.