Blends containing core–shell impact modifiers. Part 3 – Effects of temperature on tensile impact behaviour

Abstract

The performances of two contrasting core–shell impact modifiers, in blends with polycarbonate (PC), poly (methyl methacrylate) (PMMA), and poly (styrene-co-acrylonitrile) (PSAN), have been evaluated using tensile impact tests at temperatures between -80 and +50°C. In both modifiers, each individual particle has a 10 nm thick outer shell of PMMA, which is grafted to the rubber phase. In the case of modifier PB, the core of the particle is a 200 nm diameter homogeneous sphere of polybutadiene, with a T _g of -86°C. Modifier PBA has a 260 nm core of PMMA, surrounded by a 20 nm inner shell of poly (butyl acrylate-co-styrene), which has a T _g of -17°C. Tensile impact tests show that the T _g of the rubber does not necessarily control the brittle–ductile transition temperature T _BD. Both the PC–PB and PC–PBA blends exhibit some ductility at -80°C, although neither blend is as tough as plain PC at any temperature. The blend of PB with PMMA shows a modest increase in toughness above -40°C and there is a similar but rather larger increase in the toughness of the PMMA–PBA above -20°C. In PSAN blends, the PBA modifier is the more effective toughening agent ahove 0°C. It is concluded that these differences originate from differences in the balance between shear yielding and crazing in the matrix polymer, and in the ability of cavitated rubber particles to prevent crazes from turning into cracks. In PMMA and PSAN blends, the PBA modifier is the more effective toughening agent at 23°C because of its rigid core, which enables stable rubber fibrils both to form and to contribute to local strain hardening, thereby stabilising the yield zone.