Contemporary lingual orthodontic appliances offer an aesthetic and accurate means of treating malocclusion. Managing extraction-based treatments with lingual appliances presents a number of challenges. This article discusses the specific biomechanical considerations associated with extraction treatment and outlines clinical techniques that can optimize treatment outcome in these cases.
van der VeenMH, AttinR, Schwestka-PollyR, WiechmannD.Caries outcomes after orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances: do lingual brackets make a difference?Eur J Oral Sci2010; 118: 298–303.
2.
GrauerD, ProffitWR. Accuracy in tooth positioning with a fully customized lingual orthodontic appliance. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop2011; 140: 433–43.
3.
KravitzND, KusnotoB, BeGoleE, ObrezA, AgranB.How well does Invisalign work? A prospective clinical study evaluating the efficacy of tooth movement with Invisalign. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop2009; 135: 27–35.
4.
MoranKI. Relative wire stiffness due to lingual versus labial interbracket distance. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop1987; 92: 24–32.
5.
FuckLM, WiechmannD, DrescherD.Comparison of the initial orthodontic force systems produced by a new lingual bracket system and a straight-wire appliance. J Orofac Orthop2005; 66: 363–76.
6.
LiangW, RongQ, LinJ, XuB.Torque control of the maxillary incisors in lingual and labial orthodontics: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop2009; 135: 316–22.
7.
LombardoL, StefanoniF, MollicaF, LauraA, ScuzzoG, SicilianiG.Three-dimensional finite-element analysis of a central lower incisor under labial and lingual loads. Prog Orthod2012; 13: 154–63.
8.
SungSJ, BaikHS, MoonYS, YuHS, ChoYS. A comparative evaluation of different compensating curves in the lingual and labial techniques using 3D FEM. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop2003; 123: 441–50.
9.
StammT, WiechmannD, HeineckenA, EhmerU.Relation between second and third order problems in lingual orthodontic treatment. J Ling Orthod2000; 3: 5–11.
10.
SifakakisI, PandisN, MakouM, EliadesT, KatsarosC, BourauelC.A comparative assessment of torque generated by lingual and conventional brackets. Eur J Orthod2012; to be published.
11.
WiechmannD, Schwestka-PollyR, PancherzH, HohoffA.Control of mandibular incisors with the combined Herbst and completely customized lingual appliance–a pilot study. Head Face Med2010; 11: 3.
12.
Jost-BrinkmannPG, TanneK, SakudaM, MiethkeRR. A FEM study for the biomechanical comparison of labial and palatal force application on the upper incisors. Finite element method. Fortschr Kieferorthop1993; 54: 76–82.
13.
TanneK, LuYC, SakudaM.Biomechanical responses of tooth to orthodontic forces applied at the lingual bracket positions. J Osaka Univ Dent Sch1992; 32: 6–13.
14.
ScuzzoG, TakemotoK.Lingual Orthodontics: A New Approach Using STb Light Lingual System and Lingual Straight Wire. Chicago, IL: Quintessence Publishing, 2010, 97–136.
