This paper presents a series of four supernumerary cases where the use of further investigation with CBCT facilitated in the treatment planning process. The cases highlight different problems encountered when treatment planning this group of patients.
BrookADental anomalies of number, form and size: their prevalence in British schoolchildren. J Int Assoc Dent Child1974; 5: 37–53.
2.
CelikogluM, KamakH, OktayHPrevalence and characteristics of supernumerary teeth in a non-syndrome Turkish population: associated pathologies and proposed treatment. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal2010; 15: e575–78.
3.
FardiA, Kondylidou-SidiraA, BachourZ, ParisisN, TsirlisAIncidence of impacted and supernumerary teeth-a radiographic study in a North Greek population. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal2011; 16: e56–61.
4.
RajabL, HamdanM.Supernumerary teeth: review of the literature and a survey of 152 cases. Int J Paediatr Dent2002; 12: 244–54.
5.
SchulzeCDevelopmental abnormalities of the teeth and jaws. In GoldmanHM, J.GorlinR (eds.). Thoma's oral pathology, 6th Edn. St. Louis, MO: Mosby Company, 1970, 112–22.
6.
PereiraMN, de AlmeidaLE, MartinsMT, da Silva CamposMJ, FragaMR, VitralRWMultiple hyperdontia: Report of an unusual case. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop2011; 140: 580–84.
7.
PrimoschREAnterior supernumerary teeth–assessment and surgical intervention in children. Pediatr Dent1981; 3: 204–15.
RavnJAplasia, supernumerary teeth and fused teeth in the primary dentition. An epidemiologic study. Scand J Dent Res1971; 79: 1–6.
10.
MitchellL, LittlewoodSJ, DoubledayB, Nelson-MoonZLAn Introduction to Orthodontics, 3rd Edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.
11.
LustmannJ, BodnerLDentigerous cysts associated with supernumerary teeth. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg1988; 17: 100–02.
12.
DinkarAD, DawasazAA, ShenoySDentigerous cyst associated with multiple mesiodens: a case report. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent2007; 25: 56–59.
13.
SaleemT, KhalidU, HameedA, GhaffarSSupernumerary, ectopic tooth in the maxillary antrum presenting with recurrent haemoptysis. Head Face Med2010; 6: 26.
14.
Sanei-MoghaddamA, HydeN, WilliamsonPEndoscopic removal of a supernumerary tooth from the nasal cavity in an adult. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg2009; 47: 484–85.
15.
KimK, RuprechtA, JeonK, ParkCPersonal computer-based three-dimensional computed tomographic images of the teeth for evaluating supernumerary or ectopically impacted teeth. Angle Orthod2003; 73: 614–21.
16.
BayrakS, DalciK, SariSCase report: Evaluation of supernumerary teeth with computerized tomography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod2005; 100: e65–69.
17.
LudlowJ, IvanovicMComparative dosimetry of dental CBCT devices and 64-slice CT for oral and maxillofacial radiology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod2008; 106: 106–14.
18.
PredaL, La FianzaA, Di MaggioEThe use of spiral computed tomography in the localization of impacted maxillary canines. Dentomaxillofac Radiol1997; 26: 236–41.
19.
SchulzeD, HeilandM, ThurmannH, AdamGRadiation exposure during midfacial imaging using 4- and 16-slice computed tomography, cone beam computed tomography systems and conventional radiography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol2004; 33: 83–86.
20.
LudlowJ, Davies-LudlowL, BrooksS, HowertonWDosimetry of 3 CBCT devices for oral and maxillofacial radiology: CB Mercuray, NewTom 3G and i-CAT. Dentomaxillofac Radiol2006; 35: 219–26.
21.
RobertsJ, DrageN, DaviesJ, ThomasDEffective dose from cone beam CT examinations in dentistry. Br J Radiol2009; 82: 35–40.
22.
BotticelliS, VernaC, CattaneoPM, HeidmannJ, MelsenBTwo- versus three-dimensional imaging in subjects with unerupted maxillary canines. Eur J Orthod2011; 33: 344–49.
KatheriaBC, KauCH, TateR Effectiveness of impacted and supernumerary tooth diagnosis from traditional radiography versus cone beam computed tomographyCone-beam computed tomography of the maxillofacial region–an update. A novel 3D classification system for canine impactions–the KPG index. Pediatr Dent2010; 32: 304–09.
25.
KapilaS, ConleyRS, HarrellWEThe current status of cone beam computed tomography imaging in orthodontics. Dentomaxillofac Radiol2011; 40: 24–34.
26.
HusainJ, BurdwenD, McSherryPManagement of Palatally Ectopic Canines. Royal College of Surgeons England.
27.
FergusonJW, PittSKManagement of unerupted maxillary canines where no orthodontic treatment is planned; a survey of UK consultant opinion. J Orthod2004; 31: 28–33; discussion 15–16.
28.
MasonC, PapadakouP, RobertsGJThe radiographic localization of impacted maxillary canines: a comparison of methods. Eur J Orthod2001; 23: 25–34.
29.
JacobsSGRadiographic localization of unerupted teeth: further findings about the vertical tube shift method and other localization techniques. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop2000; 118: 439–47.
30.
RobertsJA, DrageNA, DaviesJ, ThomasDWEffective dose from cone beam CT examinations in dentistry. Br J Radiol2009; 82: 35–40.
31.
IsaacsonKG, ThomAR, HornerK, WhaitesEGuidelines for the Use of Radiographs in Clinical Orthodontics. British Orthodontic Society, London, 2008.
