Cone Beam CT and Orthodontic Diagnosis – a Personal View

Isaacson KG , Thom AR , Horner K , Whaites E. Guidelines for the use of Radiographs in Clinical Orthodontics. 3rd Ed 2008 London, British Orthodontic Society.

The Ionising Radiation (Medical Exposure) Regulations 2000 (I(ME)R). London HMSO.

Johnston LE Jr . Personal communication, 2010-09-16.

SEDENTEXCT Project. Radiation Protection Cone Beam CT for Dental and Maxillofacial Radiology, 2011.

Larson BE . Cone-beam computed tomography is the imaging technique of choice for comprehensive orthodontic assessment. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2012; 141: 402–409.

Ludlow JB , Gubler M , Cevidanes L , Mol A. Precision of cephalometric landmark identification: cone-beam computed tomography vs conventional cephalometric views. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2009; 136: 312–313.

Damstra J , Fourie Z , Ren Y. Comparison between two-dimensional and midsagittal three-dimensional cephalometric measurements of dry human skulls. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2011; 49: 392–395.

Merrett SJ , Drage NA , Durning P. Cone beam computed tomography: a useful tool in orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning. J Orthod 2009; 36: 202–210.

Mahdmina A , Malik O , Ashley M , Waring D. 3′2′ 1: Orthodontic re-positioning of canines into central incisors. Br Dent J 2012; 212: 369–375.

Popat H , Richmond S , Drage NA . New developments in: three-dimensional planning for orthognathic surgery. J Orthod 2010; 37: 62–71.

Friedland B. Medico-legal issues related to cone beam CT. Semin Orthod 2009; 15: 77–84.

Hazalonetis DJ . Cone-beam computed tomography is not the imaging technique of choice for comprehensive orthodontic assessment. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2012; 141: 404–411.

Product news. Br Dent J 2012; 212: 394.