Is Early Class III Protraction Facemask Treatment Effective? A Multicentre,Randomized,Controlled Trial: 3-Year Follow-Up

Abstract

Objective

To investigate the effectiveness of early class III protraction facemask treatment in children under 10 years of age at 3-year follow-up.

Design

Multicentre randomized controlled trial.

Subjects and Methods

Seventy-three patients were randomly allocated, stratified for gender, into early class III protraction facemask group (PFG) (n = 35) and a control/no treatment group (CG) (n = 38).

Outcomes

Dentofacial changes were assessed from lateral cephalograms and occlusal changes using the peer assessment rating (PAR). Self-esteem was assessed using the Piers–Harris children's self-concept scale, and the psychosocial impact of malocclusion with oral aesthetic subjective impact score (OASIS) questionnaire. Temporomandibular joint (TMJ) signs and symptoms were also recorded. The time points for data collection were at registration (DC1), 15 months later (DC2) and 3 years post-registration (DC3).

Results

The following mean skeletal and occlusal changes occurred from the class III starting point to DC3 (3-year follow-up): SNA, PFG moved forwards +2·3° (CG forward +1·6°; P = 0·14); SNB, PFG moved forwards +0·8° (CG forward +1·5°, P = 0·26); ANB, PFG class III base improved +1·5° (CG stayed about the same at +0·1°; P = 0·001). This contributed to an overall difference in ANB between PFG and CG of +1·4° in favour of early protraction facemask treatment. The overjet was still improved by +3·6 mm in the PFG and changed a small amount +1·1 mm in the CG (P = 0·001). A 21% improvement in PAR was shown in the PFG and the CG worsened by 8·4% (P = 0·02). There was no increase in self-esteem (Piers–Harris score) for PFG compared with the CG (P = 0·56) and no statistically significant difference in the impact of malocclusion (OASIS) between groups in terms of the changes from DC1 to DC3 (P = 0·18). TMJ signs and symptoms were very low at DC1 and DC3.

Conclusions

The favourable effect of early class III protraction facemask treatment undertaken in patients under 10 years of age, is maintained at 3-year follow-up in terms of ANB, overjet and % PAR improvement. The direct protraction treatment effect at SNA is still favourable although not statistically significantly better than the CG. Seventy per cent of patients in PFG had maintained a positive overjet which we have defined as ongoing treatment success. Early protraction facemask treatment does not seem to influence self-esteem or reduce the patient's personal impact of their malocclusion at 3-year follow-up.

Keywords

Class III skeletal pattern early orthopaedic treatment protraction facemask randomized controlled trial

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Kim

, Viana

, Graber

, Omerza

, Begole

The effectiveness of protraction facemask therapy — a meta analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1999; 115: 675–85.

Jager

, Braumann

, Kim

, Wahner

Skeletal and dental effects of maxillary protraction in patients with Angle class III malocclusion. J Orofac Orthop 2001; 62: 275–84.

de Toffol

, Pavoni

, Baccetti

, Franchi

, Cozza

Orthopedic treatment outcomes in class III malocclusion. Angle Orthod 2008; 78: 561–73.

Mandall

, Cousley

, DiBiase

Is early class III protraction facemask treatment effective? A multicentre randomized controlled trial: 15 month follow-up. J Orthod 2010; 37: 149–61.

Richmond

, Shaw

, O'Brien

. The development of the PAR Index (Peer Assessment Rating): reliability and validity. Eur J Orthod 1992; 14: 125–39.

Farkas

. Anthropometry of the Head and Face, 2nd Edn. New York: Raven Press, 1994.

Piers

, Harris

, Herzberg

. Piers–Harris Children's Self-concept Scale (Piers–Harris 2), 2nd Edn. Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services, 2002.

Mandall

, McCord

, Blinkhorn

, Worthington

, O'Brien

. Perceived aesthetic impact of malocclusion and oral self perceptions in 14–15 year old Asian and Caucasian children in Greater Manchester. Eur J Orthod 2000; 21: 175–83.

Bjork

, Skieller

Growth of the maxilla in three dimensions as revealed radiographically by the implant method. Br J Orthod 1977; 4: 52–64.

10.

Bjork

, Skieller

Cephalometric growth analysis of the maxilla. Trans Eur Orthod Soc 1977; 7: 209–33.

11.

Doppel

, Damon

, Joundeph

, Little

. An investigation of maxillary superimposition techniques using metallic implants. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1994; 105: 161–68.

12.

Deguchi

, Kanomi

, Ashizawa

, Rosenstein

. Very early facemask therapy in class III children. Angle Orthodontist 1999; 69: 349–55.

13.

Ngan

, Yiu

Evaluation of treatment and post treatment changes of protraction facemask treatment using the PAR index. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2000; 118: 414–20.

14.

Chong

, Ive

, Artun

Changes following the use of protraction headgear for early correction of Class III malocclusion. Angle Orthod 1996; 66: 351–62.

15.

Westwood

, McNamara

, Baccetti

, Franchi

, Sarver

. Long term effects of class III treatment with rapid maxillary expansion and facemask therapy followed by fixed appliances. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003; 123: 306–20.

16.

Hagg

, Tse

, Bendeus

, Rabie

. Long term follow-up of early treatment with reverse headgear. Eur J Orthod 2003; 25: 95–102.

17.

Wells

, Sarver

, Proffitt

. Long term efficacy of reverse pull headgear therapy. Angle Orthod 2006; 76: 915–22.

18.

Baccetti

, Franchi

, McNamara

Jr . Cephalometric variables predicting the long term success or failure of combined rapid maxillary expansion and facial mask therapy. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2004; 126: 16–22.

19.

Ngan

, Hagg

, Yiu

, Wei

. Treatment response and long term dentofacial adaptations to maxillary expansion and protraction. Sem Orthod 1997; 3: 255–64.

20.

Masucci

, Franchi

, Defraia

, Mucedero

, Cozza

, Bacetti

Stability of rapid maxillary expansion and facemask therapy: a long term controlled study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011; 140: 493–500.

21.

Vaughan

, Mason

, Moon

, Turley

. The effects of maxillary protraction therapy with or without rapid palatal expansion: a prospective randomised clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005; 128: 299–309.

22.

Tortop

, Keykubat

, Yuksel

Facemask therapy with and without expansion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007; 132: 467–74.

23.

Gravely

. A study of the mandibular closure path in Angle class III relationship. Br J Orthod 1984; 11: 85–91.

24.

Baccetti

, McGill

, Franchi

, McNamara

, Tollaro

Skeletal effects of early treatment of Class III malocclusion with maxillary expansion and face-mask therapy. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998; 113: 333–43.