Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) has been at the forefront of recent technological advances within the maxillofacial region. CBCT is useful in the accurate assessment and planning of patients undergoing orthognathic surgery. We propose that it also has a role in the post‐operative evaluation of a subgroup of patients who have suffered complications at the time of surgery. We present two cases where unfavourable splits occurred during a bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO) of the mandible. Both cases were investigated post‐operatively with CBCT with the aim of identifying the potential cause of the unfavourable split and to establish accurate localization of the condyle in the glenoid fossa following intra‐operative attempts at proximal segment control. CBCT should be considered for evaluation of the mandible following an unfavourable split where it is deemed that plain radiographs would not provide adequate information.
RichmondS, ZhurovA, CroninAJ, KayCH, HurtlesF.The process for orthognathic surgical planning. EFOSA Qual Newslett2007; 2: 7.
2.
TraunerR, ObwegeserW.The surgical correction of mandibular prognathism and retrognathia with consideration of genioplasty. I. Surgical procedures to correct mandibular prognathism and reshaping of the chin. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol1957; 10: 677–89.
3.
DalpontG.Retromolar osteotomy for the correction of prognathism. J Oral Surg1961; 19: 42–7.
4.
HunsuckEE. A modified intraoral sagittal splitting technique for correction of mandibular prognathism. J Oral Surg1968; 26: 250–53.
5.
EpkerBN. Modifications in the sagittal osteotomy of the mandible. J Oral Surg1977; 35: 157–59.
6.
O'RyanF.Complications of orthognathic surgery. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am1990; 2: 593–613.
7.
van de PerreJP, StoelingaPJ, BlijdorpPA, BrounsJJ, HoppenreijsTJ. Perioperative morbidity in maxillofacial orthopaedic surgery: a retrospective study. J Craniomaxillofac Surg1996; 24: 263–70.
8.
TeltzrowT, KramerF, SchulzeA, BaethgeC, BrachvogelP.Peri–operative complications following sagittal split osteotomy of the mandible. J Craniomaxillofac Surg2005; 33: 307–13.
9.
KimS, ParkSS. Incidence of complications and problems related to orthognathic surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg2007; 65: 2438–44.
10.
WhiteRPJr, PetersPB, CostichER, PageHLJr. Evaluation of sagittal split–ramus osteotomy in 17 patients. J Oral Surg1969; 27: 851–55.
11.
MacIntoshRB. Experience with the sagittal split osteotomy of the mandibular ramus. A 13 year review. J Maxillofac Surg1981; 9: 151–65.
TurveyT.Intraoperative complications of sagittal osteotomy of the mandibular ramus: incidence and management. J Oral Maxillofac Surg1985; 43: 504–09.
14.
van MerkesteynJP, GroutRH, van LeeuwaardenR, CroonFH. Intra–operative complications in sagittal and vertical ramus osteotomies. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg1987; 16: 665–70.
15.
SchemedSA, EskerBN. Results after mandibular advancement surgery: analysis of 87 cases. J Oral Surg1980; 38: 265–82.
16.
SinnDP, GhaliGE. Management of intraoperative complications in orthognathic surgery. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am1990; 2: 869–85.
17.
KriwalskyMS, MaurerP, VerasRB, EckertAW, SchubertJ.Risk factors for a bad split during sagittal split osteotomy. BR J Oral Maxillofac Surg2008; 46: 177–79.
18.
SimpsonW.Problems encountered in the sagittal split operation. Int J Oral Surg1981; 10: 81–86.
19.
El DeebM, WolfordL, BevisR.Complications of orthognathic surgery. Clin Plast Surg1989; 16: 825–40.
20.
RobertsJA, DrageNA, DaviesJ, ThomasDW. Effective dose from cone beam CT examinations in dentistry. Br J Radiol2009; 82: 35–40.
21.
HolmbergC, SteinhäuserS, GeisP, Rudzki–JansonI.Cone–beam computed tomography in orthodontics: benefits and limitations. J Orthofac Orthop2005; 66: 434–44.
22.
TsiklakisK, SyriopoulosK, StamataHC. Radiographic examination of the temporomandibular joint using cone beam computed tomography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol2004; 33: 196–201.
23.
HondaK, AraiY, KasimaM.Evaluation of the usefulness of the limited cone–beam CT (3DX) in the assessment of the thickness of the roof of the glenoid fossa of the temporomandibular joint. Dentomaxillofac Radiol2004; 33: 391–95.
24.
HondaK, LarheimTA, MaruhasiK, MatsumotoK, IwaiK.Osseous abnormalities of the mandibular condyle: diagnostic reliability of cone beam computed tomography compared with helical computed tomography based on autopsy material. Dentomaxillofac Radiol2006; 35: 152–57.
25.
MiracleAC, MukherjiSK. Conebeam CT of the head and neck, part 1: physical principles. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol2009; 30: 1088–95.
