Abstract
Objective
To compare the accuracy and reproducibility of measurements performed on digital virtual models with those taken on plaster casts from models poured immediately after the impression was taken, the ‘gold standard’, and from plaster models poured following a 3–5 day shipping procedure of the alginate impression.
Design
Direct comparison of two measuring techniques.
Setting
The study was conducted at the Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, University of Aarhus, Denmark in 2006/2007.
Participants
Twelve randomly selected orthodontic graduate students with informed consent.
Methods
Three sets of alginate impressions were taken from the participants within 1 hour. Plaster models were poured immediately from two of the sets, while the third set was kept in transit in the mail for 3–5 days. Upon return a plaster model was poured as well. Finally digital models were made from the plaster models. A number of measurements were performed on the plaster casts with a digital calliper and on the corresponding digital models using the virtual measuring tool of the accompanying software. Afterwards these measurements were compared statistically.
Results
No statistical differences were found between the three sets of plaster models. The intraand inter-observer variability are smaller for the measurements performed on the digital models.
Conclusions
Sending alginate impressions by mail does not affect the quality and accuracy of plaster casts poured from them afterwards. Virtual measurements performed on digital models display less variability than the corresponding measurements performed with a calliper on the actual models.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.