Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2008-9
Northcroft Memorial Lecture 2007. A Century of Progress: Advances in Orthodontics since the Foundation of the British Society for the Study of Orthodontics
The British Orthodontic Society invites outstanding contributors from the field of Orthodontics to give the guest lecture in memory of George Northcroft. In 2007 the guest lecturer was Professor Murray C. Meikle. The article that follows was presented as the Northcroft Memorial Lecture 2007 at the British Orthodontic Conference, Harrogate, UK, 24th September 2007.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
NorthcroftG (ed.) The teeth in relationship to the normal and abnormal growth of the jaws. In The growth of the jaws, normal and abnormal in health and disease. London: Dental Board of the United Kingdom, 1924.
2.
AngleEH. Treatment of malocclusion of the teeth: Angle's system. 7th Edn. Philadelphia, PA: SS White Dental Manufacturing Company, 1907.
3.
CurtisEK. Orthodontics at 2000. St. Louis, MO: American Association of Orthodontists, 2000.
4.
CaseCSThe question of extraction in orthodontia (1911). Am J Orthod1964; 50(9): 660–91.
5.
DeweyM.Practical Orthodontia. St. Louis, MO: Mosby, 1914.
6.
BroadbentBHThe face of the normal child. Angle Orthod1937; 7: 183–208.
7.
BrodieAG, DownsWB, GoldsteinA, MyerECephalometric appraisal of orthodontic results: a preliminary report. Angle Orthod1938; 8: 261–65.
8.
BrodieAGOn the growth pattern of the human head. From the third month to the eighth year of life. Am J Anat1941; 68: 209–62.
9.
MooreAWObservations on facial growth and its clinical significance. Am J Orthod1959; 45(6): 399–423.
10.
RickettsRMThe influence of orthodontic treatment on facial growth and development. Angle Orthod1960; 30: 103–33.
11.
AdamsCD, MeikleMC, NorwickKW, TurpinDLDentofacial remodelling produced by intermaxillary forces inMacaca mulatta. Arch Oral Biol1972; 17: 1519–35.
12.
DroschlHThe effect of heavy orthopedic forces on the maxilla in the growingSaimiri sciureus (squirrel monkey). Am J Orthod1973; 63: 449–61.
13.
TriftshauserR, WaltersRDCervical traction of the maxillae in the Macaca mulatta monkey using heavy orthopaedic force. Angle Orthod1976; 46: 37–46.
14.
KambaraTDentofacial changes produced by extraoral forward force in Macaca irus. Am J Orthod1977; 71: 249–77.
15.
BreitnerCBone changes resulting from experimental tooth movement. American Journal of Orthodontics and Oral Surgery1940; 26: 521–47.
16.
BreitnerCFurther investigations of bone changes resulting from experimental orthodontic treatment. American Journal of Orthodontics and Oral Surgery1941; 27: 605–32.
17.
BaumeLJ, DerischweilerHIs the condylar growth centre responsive to orthodontic therapy? An experimental study in Macaca mulatta. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol1961; 14: 347–62.
18.
StockliPW, WillertHGTissue reactions in the temporomandibular joint resulting from anterior displacement of the mandible in the monkey. Am J Orthod1971; 60: 142–55.
19.
ElgoyhenJC, MoyersRM, McNamaraJAJr, RioloML. Craniofacial adaptation to protrusive function in young rhesus monkeys. Am J Orthod1972; 62: 469–80.
20.
McNamaraJAJr, CarlsonDS. Quantitative analysis of temporomandibular adaptations to protrusive function. Am J Orthod1979; 76: 593–611.
21.
MeikleMCRemodeling the dentofacial skeleton: the biological basis of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics. J Dent Res2007; 86: 12–24.
22.
BjörkA.Facial growth in man, studied with the aid of metallic implants. Acta Odontol Scand1955; 13: 9–34.
23.
BjörkA, SkiellerV.Facial development and tooth eruption. An implant study at the age of puberty. Am J Orthod1972; 62: 339–83.
24.
EnlowDH. The human face: an account of the postnatal growth and development of the craniofacial skeleton. New York, NY: Hoeber Medical Division, 1968.
25.
HunterJ.The natural history of the human teeth. 2nd Edn. London: J Johnson, St Paul's Churchyard, 1778.
26.
HumphryGMOn the growth of the jaws. Transactions of the Cambridge Philosophical Society1866; 11: 1–5.
27.
GansC, NorthcuttGNeural crest and the origin of vertebrates. Science1983; 202: 268–74.
28.
MeikleMC. Craniofacial development, growth and evolution. Bressingham: Bateson Publishing, 2002.
29.
Le DouarinNM. The neural crest. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982.
30.
CoulyGF, ColteyPM, Le DouarinNM. The triple origin of the skull in higher vertebrates: a study in quail-chick chimeras. Development1993; 117: 409–29.
31.
KrumlaufR.Hox genes and pattern formation in the branchial region of the vertebrate head. Trends Genet1993; 9: 106–12.
32.
KurataniS, MatsuoI, AizawaSDevelopmental patterning and evolution of the mammalian viscerocranium: genetic insights into comparative morphology. Dev Dyn1997; 209: 139–55.
33.
QiuM, BulfoneA, GhattasI, Role of the Dlx homeobox genes in proximodistal patterning of the branchial arches: mutations of Dlx -1, Dlx -2 and Dlx -1 and -2 alter morphogenesis of proximal skeletal and soft tissues derived from the first and second arches. Dev Biol1997; 185: 165–84.
34.
ThomasBL, SharpePTPatterning the murine dentition by homeobox genes. Eur J Oral Sci1998; 106 (Suppl 1): 48–54.
35.
SharpePTHomeobox genes and craniofacial development. Connect Tissue Res1995; 32: 17–25.
36.
SteinerCCIs there one best orthodontic appliance?Angle Orthod1933; 3: 277–98.
37.
AngleEHThe latest and best in orthodontic mechanism. Dental Cosmos1928; 70(12): 1143–58.
38.
TweedCHIndications for the extraction of teeth in orthodontic procedure. American Journal of Orthodontics and Oral Surgery1944; 30: 405–28.
39.
HahnGExtraction panel. Orthodontics: its objectives, past and present. American Journal of Orthodontics and Oral Surgery1944; 30, 401–4.
40.
BeggPRStone age man's dentition: with reference to anatomically correct occlusion, the etiology of malocclusion, and a technique for its treatment. Am J Orthod1954; 40 (4): 298–12; 40(5): 373–83; 40(6): 462–75; 40(7): 517–31.
41.
LittleRM, WallenTR, RiedelRAStability and relapse of mandibular anterior alignment—first premolar extraction cases treated by traditional edgewise orthodontics. Am J Orthod1981; 80: 349–65.
42.
SadowskyC, SakolisEILong-term assessment of orthodontic relapse. Am J Orthod1982; 82: 456–63.
43.
AndrewsLFThe six keys to normal occlusion. Am J Orthod1972; 62: 296–309.
AndresenV, HäuplK.Functions-kieferorthopädie: die Grundlagen des ‘norwegischen Systems’. Leipzig: H Meusser, 1936.
46.
WahlNOrthodontics in 3 millennia. Chapter 9: functional appliances to midcentury. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop2006; 129: 829–33.
47.
HerbstE.Atlas und Grundriss der Zahnärztlichen Orthopädie. Munich: JF Lehmann, 1910.
48.
PancherzHTreatment of class II malocclusions by jumping the bite with the Herbst appliance. A cephalometric investigation. Am J Orthod1979; 76: 423–42.
KanomiRMini-implant for orthodontic anchorage. J Clin Orthod1997; 31: 763–67.
51.
Mini/micro screw implantation for orthodontic anchorage.London: National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE), Interventional Procedures Programme, 2007, Available at: http://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/index.jsp?action=byID&o=11358 (accessed 1st February 2008).
52.
SandstedtCEinige Beiträge zur Theorie der Zahnregulierung. Nordisk Tandläkare Tidskrift1904; 5: 236–256; 1905; 6: 1–25, 141–68.
53.
MeikleMCThe tissue, cellular and molecular regulation of orthodontic tooth movement: 100 years after Carl Sandstedt. Eur J Orthod2006; 28: 221–40.
54.
WescottDC, PinkertonMN, GaffeyBJ, BeggsKT, MilneTJ, MeikleMCOsteogenic gene expression by human periodontal ligament cells under cyclic tension. J Dent Res2007; 86: 1212–16.
55.
PinkertonMN, WescottDC, GaffeyBJ, BeggsKT, MilneTJ, MeikleMCCultured human periodontal ligament cells constitutively express multiple osteotropic cytokines and growth factors, several of which are responsive to mechanical deformation. J Periodontal Res2008; 43: 343–51.
56.
MeikleMCThe evolution of plastic and maxillofacial surgery in the twentieth century: the Dunedin connection. Surgeon2006; 4: 325–34.
57.
SandyJR, WilliamsAC, BearnD, Cleft lip and palate care in the United Kingdom—the Clinical Standards Advisory Group (CSAG) study. Part 1: background and methodology. Cleft Palate Craniofac J2001; 38: 20–23.
58.
WilliamsAC, BearnD, MildinhallS, Cleft lip and palate care in the United Kingdom—the Clinical Standards Advisory Group (CSAG) study. Part 2: dentofacial outcomes and patient satisfaction. Cleft Palate Craniofac J2001; 38: 24–29.
59.
SellD, GrunwellP, MildinhallS, Cleft lip and palate care in the United Kingdom—the Clinical Standards Advisory Group (CSAG) study. Part 3: speech outcomes. Cleft Palate Craniofac J2001; 38: 30–37.
60.
BearnD, MildinhallS, MurphyT, Cleft lip and palate care in the United Kingdom-the Clinical Standards Advisory Group (CSAG) study. Part 4. Outcome comparisons, training and conclusions. Cleft Palate Craniofac J2001; 38: 38–43.
61.
TraunerR, ObwegeserHThe surgical correction of mandibular prognathism and retrognathia with consideration of genioplasty. II. Operating methods for microgenia and distoclusion. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol1957; 10: 899–909.
62.
ObwegeserHThe indications for surgical correction of mandibular deformity by the sagittal splitting technique. Br J Oral Surg1964; 2: 157–71.
63.
ObwegeserHSurgical correction of small or retrodisplaced maxillae: the ‘dish-face’ deformity. J Plast Reconstr Surg1969; 44: 351–65.
64.
WolfSATessier P, creator of a new surgical speciality is recipient of Jacobson Innovation Award. J Craniofac Surg2001; 12: 98–99.
65.
Le FanuJ.The Rise and Fall of Modern Medicine. London: Little, Brown, 1999.
66.
BrookPH, ShawWCThe development of an index of orthodontic treatment priority. Eur J Orthod1989; 11: 309–20.
67.
RichmondS, ShawWC, O'BrienKD, The development of the PAR Index (Peer Assessment Rating): reliability and validity. Eur J Orthod1992; 14: 125–39.
68.
DanielsC, RichmondSThe development of the index of complexity, outcome and need (ICON). J Orthod2000; 27: 149–69.
69.
TravessHC, NewtonJT, SandyJR, WilliamsACThe development of a patient-centred measure of the process and outcome of combined orthodontic and orthognathic treatment. J Orthod2004; 31: 220–34.
70.
De OliveiraCM, SheihamA.Orthodontic treatment and its impact on oral health-related quality of life in Brazilian adolescents. J Orthod2004; 31: 20–27.
71.
ShawWC, RichmondS, KenealyPM, KingdomA, WorthingtonHA 20-year cohort study of health gain from orthodontic treatment: psychological outcome. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop2007; 132: 146–57.
72.
HillABThe environment and disease: association or causation?Proc Roy Soc Med1965; 58: 295–300.
73.
JakobssonSOCephalometric evaluation of treatment effects on class II, division 1 malocclusions. Am J Orthod1967; 53: 446–57.
74.
NelsonC, HarknessM, HerbisonPMandibular changes during functional appliance treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop1993; 104: 153–61.
75.
TullochJF, PhillipsC, KochG, ProffitWRThe effect of early intervention on skeletal pattern in class II malocclusion: a randomized clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop1997; 111: 391–400.
76.
KeelingSD, WheelerTT, KingGJ, Anteroposterior skeletal and dental changes after early class II treatment with bionators and headgear. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop1998; 113: 40–50.
77.
O'BrienK, WrightJ, ConboyF, Effectiveness of early orthodontic treatment with the Twin-block appliance: a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. Part 1: dental and skeletal effects. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop2003; 124: 234–43.
78.
HarrisonJE, O'BrienKD, WorthingtonHV. Orthodontic treatment for prominent upper front teeth in children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev2007; 3: CD003452.
TannerJM. Growth at Adolescence, 2nd Edn. Oxford: Blackwell, 1962.
81.
HäggU, AttströmK.Mandibular growth estimated by four cephalometric measurements. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop1992; 102: 146–52.
82.
MeikleMCGuest editorial: What do prospective randomized clinical trials tell us about the treatment of class II malocclusions? A personal viewpoint. Eur J Orthod2005; 27: 105–14.
