Abstract
Objective
To determine the accuracy of direct or indirect bracket placement.
Design
A prospective, randomized comparison of 2 different methods of bracket placement.
Setting
Queens Hospital, Burton upon Trent, UK between February and May 2001.
Materials and method
Twenty-six consecutive patients requiring upper and lower MBT™ pre-adjusted Edgewise appliances had their labial segments bonded directly or indirectly according to a split mouth system of allocation. Before and after bond-up all brackets were photographed and measured from tracings to determine positional differences from the ideal.
Results
Using ANOVA (General Linear Model), vertical errors were found to be greater than those in the horizontal plane, which in turn were greater than angular errors (p<0.05). Errors were greater in the maxillary arch than in the mandibular arch. There was no significant difference between the mean errors produced by the two methods of bracket placement.
Conclusions
Mean bracket placement errors were similar with both techniques.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.