This paper addresses a current debate about the morphology of M7C3 phase in the chrome carbide overlay (CCO) and white iron community. This morphology was investigated using a serial sectioning technique in combination with computer post-processing software. A 600×600×300 μm volume of CCO was reconstructed in three dimensions (3D) to determine the difference between blade and rod-like carbide morphologies. The 3D analysis revealed that the two carbides morphologies correspond to the same hexagonal rod-like structures, but are oriented in different directions relative to the sectioning plane.
‘The industry guide to hardfacing for the control of wear’, WTIA Technical Note 4, Welding Technology Institute of Australia, 1996.
2.
‘Welding consumables – Hardfacing classification – Microstructures’, ISO/TR 13393, International Institute of Welding, 2009.
3.
WangSR, SongLH, QiaoY and WangM: ‘Effect of carbide orientation on impact-abrasive wear resistance of high-Cr iron used in shot blast machine’, Tribol. Lett., 2013, 50, (3), 439–448.
4.
ChangC.-M, ChenL.-H, LinC.-M, ChenJ.-H, FanC.-M and WuWT: ‘Microstructural and wear characteristics of hypereutectic Fe–Cr–C cladding with various carbon contents’, Surf. Coat. Technol., 2010, 205, 245–250.
5.
LiuZJ, SuYH and SunJG: ‘Effects of shape and distribution of M7C3 on wear resistance of iron based composite’, Key Eng. Mater., 2008, 373, 560–563.
6.
DoganON, HawkJA and LairdGII: ‘Solidification structure and abrasion resistance of high chromium white irons’, Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 1997, 28A, 1315–1328.
7.
LairdGII, RawersJC and AdamsA: ‘Fractal analysis of carbide morphology in high-Cr white cast irons’, Metall. Trans. A, 1992, 23A, 2941–2945.
8.
PowellGLF and LloydPG: ‘A deep etching technique for the examination of carbide of high chromium cast iron in a scanning electron microscope’, Metallography, 1981, 14, 271–274.
9.
ZhouYF, YangYL, JiangYW, YangJ, RenXJ and YangQX: Fe-24 wt%Cr-4·1 wt%C hardfacing alloy: Microstructure and carbide re_nement mechanisms with ceria additive’, Mater. Charact., 2012, 72, 77–86.
10.
Triten alloy products group: ‘A guide to the evaluation and selection of hardfaced plate’, 1–8; Houston, TX, Service Publication of Triten Corporation.
11.
LudwigW, KingA, ReischigP, HerbigM, LauridsenEM, SchmidtS, ProudhornH, ForestS, CloetensP, Rolland du RoscoatS, BuffereJY, MarrowTJ and PoulsenHF: ‘New opportunities for 3D materials science of polycrystalline materials at the micrometre lengthscale by combined use of X-ray diffraction and X-ray imaging’, Mater. Sci. Eng., 2009, 524, 69–76.
12.
UchicMD: ‘Serial sectioning methods for generating 3D characterization data of grain and precipitate-scale microstructures’, in ‘Computational methods for microstructure-property relationships’, (ed S. Ghosh and D. Dimiduk), 31–52; 2011, New York, Springer.2011.
13.
KammerD and VoorheesPW: ‘Analysis of complex microstructures: Serial sectioning and phase-field simulations’, MRS Bull., 2008, 33, (6), 603–610.
14.
AlkemperJ and VoorheesPW: ‘Quantitative serial sectioning analysis’, 2001, 201, 1365–2818.
15.
ChawlaN and GaneshVV: ‘Three-dimensional (3D) microstructure visualization and finite element modeling of the mechanical behaviour of heterogeneous materials’, ‘Microscopy and Microanalysis’, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA, 31 July 31 – 4 August 2005.
16.
ZhuY and JiangH: ‘Digital image forensic approach for photoshop Gaussian blur’, Video Eng., 2013, 37, 55–58.
