Integrated fracture mechanics approach to analyse fatigue behaviour of welded joints

Abstract

Current fracture mechanics methods for fatigue assessment, including those that consider thresholds for crack propagation, are based on long crack behaviour. The present work is concerned with an attempt to predict the fatigue strength of welded joints using a fracture mechanics approach that takes into account the fatigue behaviour of short cracks. The methodology estimates the fatigue crack propagation rate as a function of the difference between the applied driving force and the material threshold for crack propagation, which is a function of crack length. The fatigue strength of butt welded specimens stressed transversely was analysed. Experimental results from the literature were used for comparison. Estimations are obtained by using only the fatigue limit and the fatigue propagation threshold for long cracks, and the applied stress distribution along the crack path obtained from simple finite element models. The influence of plate thickness, initial crack length, and reinforcement angle on fatigue strength of butt welded joints was analysed. Results show good agreement with experimental trends.

Keywords

WELDED JOINTS FATIGUE FRACTURE MECHANICS SHORT CRACKS LONG CRACKS

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Chan

K. S.

, Lankford

and Davidson

D. L.

: J. Eng. Mater. Technol., 1986, 108, 20–36.

Suresh

and Ritchie

R. O.

: Int. Met. Rev., 1984, 29, 445–475.

Miller

K. J.

and De Los Rios

E. R.

: ‘The behaviour of short fatigue cracks’; 1988, London, EGF Publications.

Taylor

and Knott

J. K.

: Fatigue Eng. Mater. Struct., 1981, 4, (2), 147–155.

Chapetti

M. D.

, Kitano

, Tagawa

and Miyata

: Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct., 1998, 21, 1525–1536.

Tokaji

, Ogawa

and Harada

: Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct., 1986, 9, (3), 205–217.

Gurney

T. A.

: ‘Fatigue of welded structures’; 1978, Cambridge, UK, Cambridge University Press.

‘AWS structural welding code’, 9th edn, American Welding Society, Miami, FL, USA, 1985.

Hobbacher

: ‘Fatigue design of welded joints and components’, Doc. XIII–1539–96, International Institute of Welding, Vienna, 1996.

10.

‘Fatigue design and assessment of steel structures – code of practice’, British Standard BS 7608: 1993.

11.

‘Guide on methods for assessing the acceptability of flaws in metallic structures’, British Standard BS 7910: 1999.

12.

Anderson

T. L.

: ‘Fracture mechanics’, 2nd edn, 517; 1995, Boca Raton, FL, USA, CRC Press.

13.

‘Guideline for fatigue design of steel constructions’, Japan Society of Steel Construction (JSSC), Gihodo Ltd, Tokyo, Japan, 1993.

14.

Smith

I. F. C.

and Smith

R. A.

: Eng. Fract. Mech, 1983, 18, (4), 861–869.

15.

Lawrence

F. V.

: Weld. Res., 1973, 52, 212s–220s.

16.

Nguyen

N. T.

and Wahab

M. A.

: Eng. Fract. Mech, 1996, 55, (3), 453–469.

17.

Lie

S. T.

and Lan

: Int. J. Fatigue, 1998, 20, (6), 433–439.

18.

Smith

I. F. C.

, Bremen

and Hirt

M. A.

: Proc. Conf. ‘Fatigue ’84’, Vol. 3, 1773–1782; 1984, Sheffield, UK, EMAS.

19.

Smith

I. F. C.

and Smith

R. A.

: Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct., 1982, 5, (2), 151–165.

20.

Signes

E. G.

, Baker

R. G.

, Harrison

H. D.

and Burdekin

F. M.

: Weld. J., 1967, 14, 108–116.

21.

Watkinson

, Bodger

P. H.

and Harrison

J. D.

: ‘The fatigue strength of welded joints in high strength steels and methods for its improvement’, Proc. Conf. on ‘Fatigue of welded structures’, Abington, Cambridge, UK, The Welding Institute.

22.

Radaj

and Sonsino

C. M.

: ‘Fatigue assessment of welded joints by local approaches’; 1998, Cambridge, UK, Abington Publishing.

23.

Maddox

S. J.

: ‘Some aspects of the influence of residual stresses on the fatigue behaviour of fillet welded joints in steel’, Welding Institute Members Report 123, Abington, Cambridge, UK, 1980.

24.

Miller

K. J.

: Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct., 1993, 16, (9), 931–939.

25.

Chapetti

M. D.

, Kitano

, Tagawa

and Miyata

: Int. J. Fatigue, 1999, 21, (1), 77–82.

26.

Mcevily

A. J.

and Minakawa

: Eng. Fract. Mech, 1987, 28, (5/6), 519–527.

27.

Tanaka

, Nakai

and Yamashita

: Int. J. Fract., 1981, 17, (5), 519–533.

28.

Abdel-Raouf

, Topper

T. H.

and Plumtree

: Scr. Metall. Mater., 1991, 25, (3), 597–602.

29.

Verreman

and Nie

: Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct., 1996, 19, 669–681.

30.

Chapetti

M. D.

: Int. J. Fatigue, 2003, 25, (12), 1319–1326.

31.

Taylor

, Barrett

and Gabriele

: Int. J. Fatigue, 2002, 24, 509–518.

32.

Maddox

S. J.

: Int. J. Fract., 1975, 11, (2), 221–243.

33.

Murakami

: ‘Stress intensity factors handbook’; 1987, Oxford, UK, The Society of Materials Science/Pergamon Press.

34.

Finite Element Non-linear Structural Analysis System (FINAS) code, CRC Research Institute, Inc., Tokyo, 1995.

35.

‘Standard practice for conducting force controlled constant amplitude axial fatigue test of metallic materials’, Standard ASTM E 466–96, in ‘Annual book of American Society for Testing and Materials standards’, Vol. 03. 01, 532; 2001, West Conshohocken, PA, USA, ASTM.

36.

‘Standard test for measurement of fatigue crack growth rates’, Standard ASTM E 647–00, in ‘Annual book of American Society for Testing and Materials standards’, Vol. 03.01, 636; 2001, West Conshohocken, PA, USA, ASTM.

37.

Gurney

T. R.

: ‘Fatigue of thin walled joint under complex loading’; 1997, Cambridge, UK, Abington Publishing.

38.

Gustafsson

: in ‘Design and analysis of welded high strength steel structures’, 205–224; 2002, Sheffield, UK, EMAS.