This article analyses the reasons for the continuation of the Norwegian consensual model of capitalism with its strong focus on collective bargaining and a universal public sector. Two main causes are identified. First, capital in Norway is characterized by the predominance of small and medium-sized companies and, as a result, is comparatively weak. Second, the agency of labour has been decisive and trade unions are still able to balance the structural power of Norwegian employers. Prior to the 2005 elections, trade unions adopted a more independent position from the Labour Party, and the Campaign for the Welfare State broadened the social basis for the maintenance of the public sector by bringing together trade unions and social movements. As a result, the Labour Party moved towards the left and continued to support traditional social democratic achievements such as the universal public sector and a strong role for trade unions in economic and social policy making.
AlsosK. & EldringL.2008. Labour Mobility and Wage Dumping: The Case of Norway. European Journal of Industrial Relations, 14(4): 441–59.
2.
BielerA.2006. The Struggle for a Social Europe: Trade Unions and EMU in Times of Global Restructuring.Manchester: Manchester University Press.
3.
BielerA.2011. Labour, New Social Movements and the Resistance to Neo-liberal Restructuring in Europe. New Political Economy, 16(2): 163–83.
4.
BielerA.2012. The EU, Global Europe and Processes of Uneven and Combined Development: The Problem of Transnational Labour Solidarity. Review of International Studies, forthcoming.
5.
BielerAndreas and MortonAdam David. 2001. The Gordian Knot of Agency-Structure in International Relations: A neo-Gramscian Perspective. European Journal of International Relations, 7(1): 5–35.
6.
BielerA. & MortonA.D.2004. A Critical Theory Route to Hegemony, World Order and Historical Change: Neo-Gramscian Perspectives in International Relations. Capital & Class,28(1): 85–113.
7.
BielerA. & TorjesenS.2001. Strength through Unity? A Comparative Analysis of Splits in the Austrian, Norwegian and Swedish Labour Movements over EU Membership. In: BielerA. & MortonA.D., eds. Social Forces in the Making of the ‘New Europe’: The Restructuring of European Social Relations in the Global Political Economy.Basingstoke: Palgrave, pp. 115–36.
BruffI.2008. Culture and Consensus in European Varieties of Capitalism.Basingstoke: Palgrave.
10.
BruffI.2011. What about the Elephant in the Room? Varieties of Capitalism, Varieties in Capitalism. New Political Economy, 16(4): 481–500.
11.
CernyP.G.2006. Political Globalization and the Competition State. In: StubbsR. & UnderhillG.R.D., eds. Political Economy and the Changing Global Order, 3rd edn.Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 376–86.
12.
ChristensenT.2005. The Norwegian State Transformed?West European Politics, 28(4): 721–39.
13.
CoatesD.2000. Models of Capitalism: Growth and Stagnation in the Modern Era.Cambridge: Polity.
14.
DølvikJ. & StokkeT.A.1998. Norway: The Revival of Centralized Concertation. In: FernerA. & HymanR., eds. Changing Industrial Relations in Europe, 2nd edn.Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 118–45.
GramsciA.1971. Selections from the Prison Notebooks, ed. and trans. by HoareQ. & Nowell SmithG.London: Lawrence and Wishart.
18.
GulbrandsenT. & EngelstadF.2005. Elite Consensus on the Norwegian Welfare State Model. West European Politics, 28(4): 898–918.
19.
HallP.A. & SoskiceD.2001. An Introduction to Varieties of Capitalism. In: HallP.A. & SoskiceD., eds. Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage.Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 1–68.
20.
HayC.2004. Common Trajectories, Variable Paces, Divergent Outcomes? Models of European Capitalism under Conditions of Complex Economic Interdependence. Review of International Political Economy, 11(2): 231–62.
21.
HeidarK.2005. Norwegian Parties and the Party System: Steadfast and Changing. West European Politics, 28(4): 807–33.
LindblomC.E.1977. Politics and Markets: The World's Political-Economic Systems.New York: Basic Books.
24.
ListhaugO.2005. Wealth Dissatisfaction and Political Trust in Norway: A Resource Curse?West European Politics, 28(4): 834–51.
25.
MortonA.D.2007. Unravelling Gramsci: Hegemony and Passive Revolution in the Global Political Economy.London: Pluto.
26.
OhmaeK.1995. The End of the Nation State: The Rise of Regional Economies.London: Harper Collins.
27.
ØsterudØ.2005. Introduction: The Peculiarities of Norway. West European Politics, 28(4): 705–20.
28.
RobinsonW.I.2004. A Theory of Global Capitalism: Production, Class, and State in a Transnational World.Baltimore/London: John Hopkins University Press.
29.
RommetvedtH.2005. Norway: Resources Count, But Votes Decide? From Neo-corporatist Representation to Neo-pluralist Parliamentarism. West European Politics, 28(4): 740–63.
30.
SchmitterP.C.1974. Still the Century of Corporatism?The Review of Politics, 36(1): 85–131.
31.
SilverB.J.2003. Forces of Labor: Workers' Movements and Globalization since 1870.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
32.
SitterN.2006. Norway's Storting Election of September 2005: Back to the Left?West European Politics, 29(3): 573–80.
33.
StrangeS.1996. The Retreat of the State: The Diffusion of Power in the World Economy.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
34.
EkeliThomasHaugAnne KariHougKjetil, and SteigumErling. 2003. Norges Bank Watch 2003: An Independent Review of Monetary Policy in Norway.Centre for Monetary Economics. Available at: <http://www2.bi.no/cme/NBW%202003.pdf> [accessed 20 May 2012].
35.
United Nations (UN). 1996. World Investment Report: Investment, Trade and International Policy Arrangements.New York & Geneva: UN.
WahlA.2010. How New Social Alliances Changed Politics in Norway. In: BielerA. & LindbergI., eds. Global Restructuring, Labour and the Challenges for Transnational Solidarity.London: Routledge, pp. 165–76.
38.
WahlA.2011. The Rise and Fall of the Welfare State.London: Pluto.
39.
WaltzK.N.2000. Globalization and American Power. The National Interest, 59: 46–56.
