Current debates in migration studies underestimate or neglect altogether the implications of the privatization of migration management. Outsourcing control and detention functions to private companies is part of the paradigm of new public management. Such outsourcing has created self-reinforcing mechanisms and lock-in effects. However, the extent to which such privatization is embraced varies internationally depending on the degree of neo-liberalization of the state. Empirically, the article therefore analyses developments in countries with divergent levels of privatization of migration management, including the UK, Australia, the USA, Germany and the Netherlands.
Adam Smith Institute. 1984. The Omega Justice Report. London: Adam Smith Institute.
2.
AndrisajevicR.2006. How to balance rights and responsibilities on asylum at the EU's southern border of Italy and Libya. Working Paper 27/2006, COMPAS Research Centre, University of Oxford.
3.
Australian National Accounting Office (ANAO). 2006a. Management of the Tender Process for the Detention Services Contract. Canberr, ACT: ANAO.
4.
Australian National Accounting Office (ANAO). 2006b. Preparations of DIAC's Detention and Health Services Contracts. Canberra, ACT: ANAO.
5.
BaconC.2005. The Evolution of Immigration Detention in the UK: The Involvement of Private Prison Companies. Working Paper 27/2005, RSC, University of Oxford.
BrochmannG.HammarT. eds. 1999. Mechanisms of Immigration Control: A Comparative Analysis of European Regulation Policies. Oxford: Berg.
8.
CastellsM.1975. Immigrant Workers and Class Struggles in Advanced Capitalism: The Western European Experience. Politics and Society, 5(1): 33–66.
9.
CastlesS.KosackG.1973. Immigrant Workers and Class. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
10.
Chief Inspector of Prisons. 2008. Report on an Unannounced Full Follow-Up Inspection of Harmondsworth Immigration Removal Centre. London: HM Inspectorate of Prisons.
11.
CorneliusW.TsudaT.MartinP.L.HollifieldJ.F. eds. 2004. Controlling Immigration: A Global Perspective. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
12.
CruzA.1991. Carrier Sanctions in Four European Community States: Incompatibilities Between International Civil Aviation and Human Rights Obligations. Journal of Refugee Studies, 4(1): 63–81.
EllermannA.2009. States against Migrants: Deportation in Germany and the USA. New York: Cambridge University Press.
15.
EvansC.2008. New Directions in Detention: Restoring Integrity to Australia's Immigration System. Speech at Australian National University, Canberra, 29 July.
16.
FeeleyM.2002. Entrepreneurs of Punishment: The Legacy of Privatization. Punishment and Society, 4(3): 321–344.
17.
FlynnM.CannonC.2009. The Privatization of Immigration Detention: Towards a Global View. Global Detention Project, Graduate Institute, Geneva.
18.
FriedmanM.1951. Nyliberalismen og dens muligheter [Neo-liberalism and its Prospects], Farmand, February 17: 89–93.
19.
GambleA.1988. The Free Economy and the Strong State: The Politics of Thatcherism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
20.
GeddesA.2003. The Politics of Migration and Immigration in Europe. London: Sage.
21.
Genovade N.2010. The Deportation Regime: Sovereignty, Space, and the Freedom of Movement. In: PeutzN.de GenovaN., eds. The Deportation Regime: Sovereignty, Space, and the Freedom of Movement. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, pp. 33–68.
22.
GinnE.2008. Outsourcing Abuse: The Use and Misuse of State-sanctioned Force during the Detention and Removal of Asylum Seekers. London: Medical Justice Network.
23.
Giorgide A.2006. Re-thinking the Political Economy of Punishment. Aldershot: Ashgate.
GreeneJ.PatelS.2007. The Immigrant Gold Rush: The Profit Motive behind Immigrant Detention. Geneva: UN Special Rapporteur on the Rights of Migrants.
26.
GuiraudonV.2002. Logiques et pratiques de l'Etat delegateur: Les compagnies de transport dans le contrôle migratoire à distance. Partie 1, Cultures et conflits, 4 [online]. Available at: <http://www.conflits.org/index771.html>.
27.
GuiraudonV.LahavG.2000. A Reappraisal of the State Sovereignty Debate: The Case of Migration Control. Comparative Political Studies, 33(2): 163–195.
28.
HallP.SoskiceD. eds. 2001. Varieties of Capitalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
29.
HardingR.W.1998. Private Prisons. In: TonryM., ed. The Handbook on Crime and Punishment. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 19–56.
30.
HeinzJ.P.LaumannE.O.NelsonR.L.SalisburyR.H.1993. The Hollow Core: Private Interests in National Policy-making. Boston, MA: Cambridge University Press.
HirschJ.1980. Der Sicherheitsstaat. Frankfurt: Europäische Verlagsanstalt.
33.
Her Majesty's Inspector of Prisons (HMIP). 1998. Campsfield House Detention Centre: A Report by Her Majesty's Chief Inspector of Prisons Following an Unannounced Short Inspection. London: HMIP.
34.
House of Commons Hansard. 2010. House of Commons Debate, 6 September 2010: 36W.
35.
Joint Council for the Welfare of Immigrants (JCWI). 1988. Annual Report 1988. London: JCWI.
36.
JonesT.NewburnT.2005. Comparative Criminal Justice Policy Making in the USA and the United ingdom: The Case of Private Prisons. British Journal of Criminology, 45: 58–80.
37.
KöppeO.2003. The Leviathan of Competitiveness: How and Why Do Liberal States (Not) Accept Unwanted mmigration?Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 29(3): 431–449.
38.
LahavG.1998. Immigration and the State: The Devolution and Privatisation of Migration Control in the EU. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 24(4): 675–694.
39.
LevyC.2010. Refugees, Europe, Camps/State of Exception: ‘Into the Zone’, Extraterritorial Processing of Migrants, Refugees, and Asylum-seekers (Theories and Practice). Refugee Studies Quarterly, 29(1): 92–119.
40.
LoganC.1990. Private Prisons: Pros and Cons. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
41.
McDonaldD.C.1994. Public Imprisonment by Private Means. British Journal of Criminology, Delinquency and Deviant Social Behaviour, 34, Special Issue, 29–48.
42.
MenzG.2008. The Political Economy of Managed Migration. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
43.
Ministerie van Justitie. 2007. Detentibooten Zuid-Holland locatie Rotterdam Inspectiebericht Vervolgonderzoog. The Hague: Dutch Ministry of Justice.
44.
Ministerie van Justitie. 2010. Detentiecentrum Noord-Holland locatie Zaandam Inspectierapport Doorlichting. The Hague: Dutch Ministry of Justice.
45.
NewburnT.2002. Atlantic Crossings: ‘Policy Transfer’ and Crime Control in the USA and Britain. Punishment and Society, 4(2): 165–194.
46.
NicholsonF.1997. Implementation of the Immigration (Carriers' Liability) Act 1987: Privatising Immigration Functions at the Expense of International Obligations. International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 46(3): 586–634.
47.
NollG.2003. Visions of the Exceptional: Legal and Theoretical Issues Raised by Transit Processing Centres and Protection Zones. European Journal of Migration and Law, 5: 303–341.
48.
Parliament of Australia. 2009. Immigration Detention in Australia: Facilities, Services and Transparency. Canberra, ACT: House of Representatives Printing and Publishing Office.
49.
PeckJ.2010. Constructions of Neo-liberal Reason. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
50.
PeutzN.de GenovaN.2010. Introduction. In: PeutzN.de GenovaN., eds. The Deportation Regime: Sovereignty, Space, and the Freedom of Movement. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, pp. 1–32.
51.
PioreM.1979. Birds of Passage: Migrant Labour and Industrial Societies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
52.
PontussonJ.2005. Varieties and Commonalities of Capitalism. In: CoatesD., ed. Varieties of Capitalism, Varieties of Approaches. Basingstoke: Palgrave, pp. 163–188.
53.
PoulantzasN.2002. Staatstheorie. Hamburg: VSA.
54.
ScholtenS.MinderhoudP.2008. Regulating Immigration Control: Carrier Sanctions in the Netherlands. European Journal of Migration and Law, 10: 123–147.
55.
ShawS.2004. Investigation into Allegations of Racism, Abuse and Violence at Yarl's Wood Removal Centre: A Report by the Prisons and Probation Ombudsman for England and Wales. London: Prisons and Probation Ombudsman.
56.
SoederbergS.MenzG.CernyP. eds. 2005. Internalizing Globalization: The Rise of Neo-liberalism and the Decline of National Varieties of Capitalism. Basingstoke; Palgrave.
57.
SparksR.1994. Can Prisons be Legitimate? Penal Politics, Privatization, and the Timeliness of an Old Idea. British Journal of Criminology, Delinquency and Deviant Social Behaviour, 34, Special Issue: 14–28.
58.
StiglerG.1971. The Theory of Economic Regulation. Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, 3: 3–18.
59.
Times, The. 1995. Labour gives pledge to end prison privatization. 8 March, p. 14.
60.
TorpeyJ.1999. The Invention of the Passport: Surveillance, Citizenship, and the State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
61.
UK Border Agency (UKBA). 2009. Enforcement Instructions and Guidance. London: UKBA.
62.
US Department of Homeland Security Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement. 2003. Form M-592 (8/15/03) ENDGAME Office of Detention and Removal Strategic Plan, 2003–2012: Detention and Removal Strategy for a Secure Homeland. Washington, DC: US Department of Homeland Security.
63.
US Department of Homeland Security Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement. 2009. Immigration Detention Overview and Recommendations. Washington, DC: US Department of Homeland Security.
WacquantL.2009. Punishing the Poor: The Neo-liberal Government of Social Insecurity. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
66.
YoungP.1987. The Prison Cell. London: Adam Smith Institute.
67.
ZolbergA.1999. The American Experience. In: HirschanC.KasinitzP.DeWindJ., eds. The Handbook of International Migration. New York: Russell Sage, pp. 71–93.
