The current crisis confirmed that highly financialized regimes of accumulation are extremely crisis-prone. Most of the literature on financialization is focused on the economies of the centre. This paper analyses the peculiarities of financialization in the periphery, which is characterized by a high degree of extraversion and/or by considerable socio-economic heterogeneity. The theory of regulation permits analysis of different forms of financialization and the social dynamics linked with them. In contrast to Keynesian approaches, the state, international organizations and social forces shaping norms and policies are an explicit part of the theory. This allows for looking at policy-making within the analysis. Such an analysis enables us to explain policy changes (or lack of them) that are crucial for the processes of financialization and de-financialization in the periphery.
AkyüzY.CornfordA.1999. Capital Flows to Developing Countries and the Reform of the International Financial System. UNCTAD Discussion Paper, No. 143. Geneva: UNCTAD.
8.
AmableB.2005. Les cinq capitalisms. Diversité des systèmes économiques et sociaux dans la mondialisation. Paris: Seuil.
9.
ArandarenkoM.2009. Serbia's Troubled Labour Market. In: PetritschW.SvilanovićG.SoliozC., eds. Serbia Matters: Domestic Reforms and European Integration. Baden-Baden: Nomos, pp. 201–209.
10.
Banco Central de Chile. 2001. Indicadores Económicos y Sociales de Chile 1960–2000. Santiago de Chile: Banco Central de Chile.
11.
Banco Central de Chile. 2010. Base de Datos Económicos. Santiago de Chile: Banco Central de Chile.
12.
BarbosaN.de SouzaJ.2010. A Inflexão do governo Lula: Política econômica, crescimento e distribuição de renda. In: SaderE.GarciaM.A., eds. Brasil entre o Passado e o Futuro. São Paulo: Boitempo, pp. 57–110.
13.
BartoM.Kmet'T.2000. Bankový sektor v Slovenskej republike. In: MarenčinA.BeblavýM., eds. Hospodárska politika na Slovensku 1990–1999. Bratislava: CSMA/SFPA, pp. 347–361.
14.
BeaudM.1987. Le système mondial/national hierarchisé. Une nouvelle lecture du capitalisme mondial. Paris: La Découverte.
15.
BeckerJ.2002. Akkumulation, Regulation, Territorium. Zur kritischen Rekonstruktion der französischen Regulationstheorie. Marburg: Metropolis.
16.
BeckerJ.2004. EU-Verfassung: Zentrum gegen Peripherie?Kurswechsel, (1): 7–16.
17.
BeckerJ.2007. Dollarisation in Latin America and Euroisation in Eastern Europe: Parallels and Differences. In: BeckerJ.WeissenbacherR., eds. Dollarization, Euroization and Financial Instability. Central and Eastern Europe between Stagnation and Financial Crisis?Marburg: Metropolis, pp. 223–278.
18.
BeckerJ.2008. Der kapitalistische Staat in der Peripherie: Polit-ökonomische Perspektiven. Journal für Entwicklungspolitik, 24(2): 10–32.
19.
BeckerJ.JägerJ.2010. Development Trajectories in the Crisis in Europe. Debatte: Journal of Contemporary Central and Eastern Europe, 18(1): 5–27.
20.
de BernisG.1983. Une alternative à l'hypothèse de l'équilibre économique générale: La régulation de l'économie capitaliste. In: GRREC, ed. Crises et régulation. Grenoble: PUG, pp. 13–51.
21.
BoyerR.1986. La théorie de la régulation: Une analyse critique. Paris: La Découverte.
22.
BoyerR.2000. Is a Finance-led Growth Regime a Viable Alternative to Fordism? A Preliminary Analysis. Economy and Society, 29(1): 111–145.
23.
BoyerR.2004. Une théorie du capitalisme est-elle possible?Paris: Odile Jacob.
24.
BoyerR.DehoveM.PlihonD.2004. Les crises financières. Paris: La Documentation française.
25.
BrenderA.PisaniF.2009. La crise de finance globalisée. Paris: La Découverte.
26.
BrunoM.2008. Régulation et croissance économique au Brésil après la libéralisation. Revue de la régulation, 3/4. Available at: http://regulation.revues.org/index4103.html [Accessed December 22, 2008].
27.
BrzicaD.2006. Vývoj firemných skupín ako dôsledok koncentrácie vlastníctva a kontroly po roku 1993: Príklad českej republiky a Slovenskej republiky. Ekonomický časopis, 54(8): 771–884.
28.
BukvićR.KovačevićI.2008. Serbian manufacturing industry, 2005–2007. Survey Republic of Serbia, 49(3): 61–82.
29.
CalderónH.1981. Veränderung der Klassenstruktur der chilenischen Bourgeoisie 1970–1980. In: CalderónH., ed. Chile. Der Monetarismus an der Macht. Hamburg: Junius, pp. 100–136.
30.
Cepal. 2002. Balance preliminar de las economías de América Latina y el Caribe, 2002. Santiago de Chile: Cepal.
31.
ChesnaisF.2000. Le pouvoir de la finance (André Orléan). L'Année de la régulation, (4): 305–324.
32.
CoriatB.2006. Moves towards Finance-led Capitalism: The French Case. In: CoriatB.PetitP.SchméderG., eds. The Hardship of Nations: Exploring the Paths of Modern Capitalism. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 69–96.
33.
CorreaJ.JägerJ.2007. Sistema financiero, regulación y crisis: La experiencia chilena. In: BeckerJ., ed. El golpe del Capital. Las crisis financieras en el Cono Sur y sus salidas. Montevideo: Coscoroba Ediciones, pp. 137–152.
34.
D̆uranaR.D̆uranaR.RiptováO.2010. Sociálna politika. In: KollárM.MesežnikovG.BútoraM., eds. Slovensko 2010. Súhrnna správa o stave spoločnosti a trendoch na rok 2010. Bratislava: IVO, pp. 431–458.
35.
DvorskyS.ScheiberT.StixH.2010. Real Effects of Crisis Have Reached CESEE Households: Euro Survey Shows Dampened Savings and Changes in Borrowing Behavior. Focus on European Economic Integration, 2(2010): 79–90.
36.
ErturkI.FroudJ.JohalS.LeaverA.WilliamsK.2008. Financialization at Work. London: Routledge.
37.
European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD). 2010a. Annual Meeting 2010. Beyond the Crisis: The Road to Recovery, 15 May [accessed 9 June 2010]. Available at: www.ebrd.com/new/am/transcripts/beyond.pdf.
38.
EBRD. 2010b. Nineteenth Annual Meeting of the Board of Governors, Zagreb. Capital Markets Forum. Transcript, 14 May [accessed 9 June 2010]. Available at: www.ebrd.com/new/am/transcripts/cam2010.pdf.
EwingJ.2010. Debt Burden Falls Heavily on Germany and France. International Herald Tribune, 14 June, pp. 1, 17.
41.
FariaL.2007. Crisis financiera, estabilización y estancamiento en Brasil. In: BeckerJ., ed. El golpe del capital. Las crisis financieras en el Cono Sur y sus salidas. Montevideo: Coscoroba, pp. 89–107.
42.
FazioH.2000. La Transnacionalización de la Economía Chilena. Mapa de la Extreme Riqueza al año 2000. Santiago de Chile: Lom.
43.
FosterJ.MagdoffF.2009. The Great Financial Crisis: Causes and Consequences. New York: Monthly Review Press.
44.
FrangakisM.2009. Europe's Financial Systems under Pressure. In: GrahlJ., ed. Global Finance and Social Europe. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 53–90.
45.
FritzB.2002. Entwicklung durch wechselkurs-basierte Stabilisierung? Der Fall Brasilien. Marburg: Metropolis.
46.
FuenzalidaM.Ruiz-TagleJ.2009. Riesgo Financiero de los Hogares. Economía Chilena, 12(2): 35–53.
47.
FurtadoC.1983. O Brasil pós-milagre, 8th edition. Rio de Janeiro: Paz e Terra.
48.
GallegoF.LoayzaN.2000. Estructura Financiera en Chile: Desarollos Macroeconómicos y Efectos Microeconómicos. Economía Chilena, 3(2): 5–30.
49.
GallegoF.HernándezL.Schmidt-HebbelK.2002. Capital Controls in Chile: Were they effective? In: HernándezL.Schmidt-HebbelK., eds. Banking, Financial Integration and International Crisis. Santiago de Chile: Central Bank of Chile, pp. 361–412.
50.
GerberyD.KvapilováE.2006. Nové inštitucionálne črty sociálneho štatu na Slovensku. Ekonomická časopis, 54(2): 107–125.
51.
GimenezD.2008. Ordem Liberal e a Questão Social no Brasil. São Paulo: LTR.
52.
GligorovV.2009. Serbia: Floating without an Anchor. In: PetritschW.SvilanovićG.SoliozC., eds. Serbia Matters: Domestic Reforms and European Integration. Baden-Baden: Nomos, pp. 181–186.
53.
GonçalvesR.2006. Desestabilização macroeconômica e dominação do capital financeiro no Brasil. In: ArceoE.BasualdoE., eds. Neoliberalismo y sectores dominantes: Tendencias globales y experiencias nacionales. Buenos Aires: CLACSO, pp. 207–236.
54.
GouldJ.SicknerC.2008. Making Market Democracies? The Contingent Loyalties of Post-privatization elites in Azerbaijan, Georgia and Serbia. Review of International Political Economy, 15(5): 740–769.
55.
GuttmannR.2008. A Primer of Finance-led Capitalism and Its Crisis. Revue de la régulation, 3/4 [accessed 23 December 2008]. Available at: http://regulation.revues.org/document5843.html.
56.
HalimiS.2010. Macht und Geld und Politik. Le Monde diplomatique, 16(6): 1, 23.
57.
HarveyD.1984. Limits to Capital, 2nd edition. Oxford: Blackwell.
58.
HeymannD.KosacoffB.2000. Introducción: Comentarios generales sobre el comportamiento de la economía y temas abiertas al finalizar los noventa. In: HeymannD.KosacoffB., eds. La Argentina de los noventa. Desempeño económico en un contexto de reformas. Tomo I. Buenos Aires: Eudeba and Cepal, pp. 9–36.
59.
HolmanO.2002. Die Neue Europäische Peripherie. Ost- und Süderweiterung der Europäischen Union im Vergleich. Prokla, 32(128): 399–420.
60.
HuffschmidJ.2009. Nicht die Krise, der Finanzkapitalismus ist das Problem. Vom normalen Funktionieren, von Umverteilung und Instabilität. In: CandeiasM.RillingR., eds. Krise. Neues vom Finanzkapitalismus und seinem Staat, Berlin: Karl Dietz, pp. 53–73.
61.
HunyaG.2009. FDI in the CEECs under the Impact of the Global Crisis: Sharp Declines. In: WIIW Database on Foreign Direct Investment in Central, East and Southeast Europe, 2009. Vienna: WIIW.
62.
HussonM.2004. Der Kapitalismus nach der ‘neuen Ökonomie’. In: ZellerC., ed. Die globale Enteignungsökonomie. Münster: Westfälisches Dampfboot, pp. 127–159.
63.
International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (IBRD). 2007. Country Partnership Strategy for the Republic of Serbia for the Period FY08-FY11. Report No. 41310-YF. Washington: IBRD.
64.
International Monetary Fund (IMF). 2010. Republic of Serbia: Staff Report for the 2010 Article IV Consultation, Third Review Under the Stand-By Arrangement, and Financing Assurances Review, IMF Country Report No. 10/93. Washington: IMF.
65.
JessopB.SumN.-L.2006. Beyond the Regulation Approach: Putting Capitalist Economies in their Place. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
66.
JohsuaI.2009. La grande crise du XXIe siècle. Une analyse marxiste. Paris: La Découverte.
67.
KristićG.2008. Poverty profile in Serbia in the period from 2002–2007. In: VukomirovićD.GovoniR. Smith, eds. Living Standards Measurement Study, Serbia 2002–2007. Belgrade: Statistical Office of the Republic of Serbia, pp. 9–27.
LazićM.2007. Post-Socialist Transformation in Serbia: Changing Recruitment Patterns of the Economic Elite. In: LaneD.LengyelG.TholenJ., eds. Restructuring of the Economic Elites after State Socialism: Recruitment, Institutions, and Attitudes. Stuttgart: ibidem, pp. 115–126.
70.
LazićM.SekeljL.1997. Privatization in Yugoslavia (Serbia and Montenegro). Europe-Asia Studies, 49(6): 1057–1070.
71.
LordonF.2000a. La ‘création de valeur’ comme rhétorique et comme pratique. Généalogie et sociologie de la ‘valeur actionnariale’. L'Année de la régulation, (4): 117–168.
72.
LordonF.2000b. Fonds de pension, piège à cons? Mirage de la démocratie actionnariale. Paris: Raisons d'agir.
73.
LordonF.2008. Jusqu' à quand? Pour en finir avec les crises financières. Paris: Raisons d'agir.
74.
MarxK.1979. Das Kapital. Kritik der politischen Ökonomie. Band 3, MEW 25. Berlin: Dietz Verlag.
75.
MatijascicM.KayS.2008. Pensions in Brazil: Reaching the Limits of Parametric Reform in Latin America. In: KayS.SinhaT., eds. Lessons from Pension Reform in the Americas. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 286–213.
76.
McNallyD.2009. From Financial Crisis to World Slump: Accumulation, Financialisation and the Global Slowdown. Historical Materialism, 17(2): 35–83.
77.
MontgomerieJ.WilliamsK.2009. Financialised Capitalism: After the Crisis and Beyond Neoliberalism. Competition & Change, 13(2): 99–107.
78.
MorvayK.2010. Hospodársky vývoj Slovenska v roku 2009. Bratislava: Ekonomický ústav SAV.
79.
Národná Banka Slovenska. 2010a. Vybrané ukazovatele hospodárskeho a menového vývoja SR [accessed 16 June 2010]. Available at: www.nbs.sk.
80.
Národná Banka Slovenska. 2010b. Bázický a medziročný index cien nehnutel'ností na bývanie za SR [accessed 16 June 2010]. Available at: www.nbs.sk.
81.
National Bank of Serbia (NBS). 2009. Statistical Bulletin, December 2009. Belgrade: NBS.
82.
NBS. ed. 2010. Statistical Bulletin, January 2010. Belgrade: NBS.
83.
NěmecJ.2004. Možnosti Slovenskej republiky vo formujúcej sa svetovej ekonomiku a jej stratégia. In: RolkováN., ed. Desat'ročie Slovenskej republiky. Martin: Matica slovenská, pp. 189–200.
84.
NovyA.2001. Brasilien: Die Unordnung der Peripherie. Von der Sklavenhaltergesellschaft zur Diktatur des Geldes. Vienna: Promedia.
85.
ObradovićM.2007. The Socio-historical Consequences of Privatisation in Serbia. South-East Europe Review, 10(1): 39–60.
86.
de OliveiraF.2003. Crítica da razão dualistal O ornitorrinco. São Paulo: Boitempo.
87.
OrléanA.1999. Le pouvoir de la finance. Paris: Odile Jacob.
88.
PöschlJ.2009. Overview Southeast Europe: Shifting from the Expansion to the Contraction Mode. In: GligorovV.HunyaG.PöschlJ., eds. Differentiated Impact of the Global Crisis: Current Analyses and Forecasts 3, February 2009. Economic Prospects for Central, East and Southeast Europe. Vienna: WIIW, pp. 57–70.
89.
Republic of Serbia. 2007. Macroeconomic Trends and Serbian Budget 2001–2007 and 2008–2010 Projections. Survey Republic of Serbia, 48(4): 19–40.
90.
Republic of Serbia. 2010. Letter of Intent and Technical Memorandum of Understanding. Belgrade, 18 March. In: International Monetary Fund (IMF), ed. Republic of Serbia and the IMF. Washington [accessed 22 June 2010]. Available at: www.imf.org/external/np/loi/2010/srb/031810.pdf.
91.
SalamaP.1996. La financiarisation excluante: Les leçons des économies latino-américaines. In: ChesnaisF., ed. La mondialisation financière. Genèse, coût et enjeux. Paris: La découverte, pp. 213–249.
92.
dos SantosP.2009. On the Content of Banking in Contemporary Capitalism. Historical Materialism, 17(2): 180–213.
93.
SicsúJ.2006. Rumos da liberalização financeira brasileira. Revista de Economia Política, 26(3): 364–380.
94.
SmithA.1998. Reconstructing the Regional Economy: Industrial Transformation and Regional Development in Slovakia. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
95.
SmithN.2006. Nature as Accumulation Strategy. In: PanitchL.LeysC., eds. Socialist Register 2007: Coming to Terms with Nature. Monmouth: Merlin Press, pp. 16–36.
96.
Statistical Office of the Republic of Serbia. 2009a. Statistical Yearbook 2009. Belgrade: Statistical Office of the Republic of Serbia.
97.
Statistical Office of the Republic of Serbia. 2009b. Labor Force Survey 2008: Bulletin 499. Belgrade: Statistical Office of the Republic of Serbia.
StockhammerE.2009. The Finance-dominated Accumulation Regime, lncome Distribution and the Present Crisis. WU Wien, Department of Economics Working Paper, No. 127.
100.
TkačM.2004. Transformácia, privatizácia a vstup zahraničného kapitálu. In: RolkováN., ed. Desat'ročie Slovenskej republiky. Martin: Matica slovenská, pp. 201–210.
101.
United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD). 2008. World Investment Report 2008: Transnational Corporations and the Infrastructure Challenge. New York: United Nations.
102.
CornejoI. Valenzuela1985. Costo Real del Crédito en 1984. In: Serie de Estudios Económicos. Documentos de Investigación. Santiago de Chile: Banco Central.
103.
Vienna lnstitute for lnternational Economic Studies (WIIW). 2009. Handbook of Statistics 2009: Central, East and Southeast Europe. Vienna: REMA.
104.
WeissenbacherR.2007. Historical Considerations of Uneven Development in East Central Europe. In: BeckerJ.WeissenbacherR., eds. Dollarization, Euroization and Financial Instability: Central and Eastern European Countries between Stagnation and Financial Crisis?Marburg: Metropolis, pp. 35–83.
105.
WeissenbacherR.BeckerJ.2010. FDI and Structural Imbalances in CEE and SEE. In: Institute of International Politics and Economics (IIPE), ed. Serbia in Contemporary Geostrategic Surroundings. Belgrade: IIPE, pp. 367–379.
106.
WorthO.2009. Whatever Happened to the Semi-periphery? In: WorthO.MooreP., eds. Globalization and the ‘New’ Semi-peripheries. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
107.
Yaman-ÖztürkM.ErcanF.2009. 1979 krizinden 2001 krizine Türkiye'de sermaye süreci ve yaşanan dönüşümler. Praksis, (19): 55–93.
108.
ZhangX.2009. From Banks to Markets: Malaysian and Taiwanese Finance in Transition. Review of International Political Economy, 16(3): 382–408.
