Intrafirm competition is one of the most contentious issues in multinational companies (MNCs). It occurs when different subsidiaries of an MNC overlap with regard to products, markets or technologies and headquarters try to make use of this overlap by coercive comparisons. It also occurs when a subsidiary takes an initiative that challenges an existing mandate of another subsidiary. Despite the large potential for conflict in intrafirm competition, neither the literature on intrafirm competition nor the more extensive literature on subsidiary mandate change has paid systematic attention to the political dimension of intrafirm competition. Therefore, a political framework to study intrafirm competition is developed in this paper, drawing on classical organisational politics approaches. The focus of this framework is on core actors in intrafirm competition, i.e. headquarters and subsidiary executives, their interest-based strategies, and their interaction in micro-political games evolving around intrafirm competition.
AnnerM.GreerI.HauptmeierM.LillieN.WinchesterN. (2006) The industrial determinants of transnational solidarity: Global interunion politics in three sectors, European Journal of industrial relations, 12(1): 7–27.
2.
BacharachS.LawlerE.J. (1980) Power and Politics in Organizations. The Social Psychology of Conflict, Coalitions and Bargaining (New York: Wiley).
3.
BacharachS.LawlerE.J. (1981) Power and tactics in bargaining, Industrial and Labour Relations Review, 34(2): 219–233.
4.
BanaiM.HarryW. (2004) Boundaryless global careers: The international itinerants, International Studies of Management and Organization, 34(3): 96–120.
5.
BanaiM.ReiselW.D. (1993) Expatriate managers' loyalty to the MNC: Myth or reality? An exploratory study, Journal of International Business Studies, 24(2); 233–248.
6.
BartlettC.A.GhoshalS. (1989) Managing across Borders: The Transnational Solution (Boston: Harvard Business School Press).
7.
Becker-RitterspachF. (2006) The social constitution of knowledge integration in MNEs: A theoretical framework, Journal of International Management, 12(3): 358–377.
8.
Becker-RitterspachFLangeK.LohrK. (2002) Control mechanisms and patterns of reorganization in MNCs, in GeppertM.MattenD.WilliamsK. (eds), Challenges for European Management in a Global Context: Experiences from Britain and Germany (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan), pp. 68–95.
9.
BélangerJ.EdwardsP. (2006) Towards a political economy framework: TNCs as national and global players, in FernerA.QuintanillaJ.Sánchez-RundeC. (eds), Multinationals, Institutions and the Construction of Transnational Practices: Convergence and Diversity in the Global Economy (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan) pp. 24–51.
10.
BirkinshawJ. (1996) How multinational subsidiary mandates are gained and lost, Journal of International Business Studies, 27(3): 467–495.
11.
BirkinshawJ. (2000) Entrepreneurship in the Global Firm (London: Sage).
12.
BirkinshawJ. (2001) Strategies for managing internal competition, California Management Review, 44(1): 21–38.
13.
BirkinshawJ.LingbladM. (2005) Intrafirm competition and charter evolution in the multi-business firm, Organization Science, 16: 674–686.
14.
BirkinshawJ.MorrisonA.J. (1995) Configurations of strategy and structure in subsidiaries of multinational corporations, Journal of International Business Studies, 26(4): 729–753.
15.
BirkinshawJ.RiddersträleJ. (1999) Fighting the corporate immune system: A process study of subsidiary initiatives in multinational corporations, International Business Review, 8(2): 149–180.
16.
BlackJ.S.GregersenH.B. (1992), Serving two masters: Managing the dual allegiance of expatriate employees, Sloan Management Review, 33(4): 61–71.
17.
BouquetC.BirkinshawJ. (2008) Managing power in the multinational corporation how low-power actors gain influence, Journal of Management, 34(3): 477–508.
18.
BurgelmanR. (1983) A process model of corporate venturing in the diversified major firm, Adminstrative Science Quarterly, 28: 223–244.
CantwellJ. (1996) Transnational corportions and innovatory activities, in DunningJ. H.SauvantK. P. (eds), Transnational Corporations and World Development (London: International Thomson Business Press), pp. 145–180.
CerratoD. (2006) The multinational enterprise as an internal market system, International Business Review, 15: 253–277.
23.
CrozierM.FriedbergE. (1980) Actors and Systems: The Politics of Collective Action (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).
24.
DelanyE. (1998) Strategic development of multinational subsidiaries in Ireland, in BirkinshawJ.HoodN. (eds), Multinational Corporate Evolution and Subsidiary Development (Basingstoke: Macmillan Press), pp. 239–265.
25.
DörrenbächerC. (2007) Challenges for foreign-owned subsidiaries in FDI-led modernization strategies: The case of Hungary, Competition & Change, 11(2): 177–195.
26.
DörrenbächerC.GammelgaardJ. (2006) Subsidiary role development: The effect of micro-political headquarters-subsidiary negotiations on the product, market and value-added scope of foreign-owned subsidiaries, Journal of International Management, 12(3): 266–283.
27.
DörrenbächerC.GeppertM. (2007) The impact of foreign subsidiary managers' socio-political positioning on career choices and their subsequent strategizing: Evidence from German-owned subsidiaries in France, in OzbilginM.PinesM. MalachPinesA. Malach (eds), Career Choice in Management and Entrepreneurship: A Research Companion (Aldershot: Edward Elgar), pp. 240–257.
28.
DörrenbächerC.GeppertM. (2009) A micro-political perspective on subsidiary initiative-taking: Evidence from German-owned subsidiaries in France, European Management Journal, 27(2): 100–112.
29.
FleckerJ. (2000) Transnationale Unternehmen und die Macht des Ortes, in DörrenbächerC.PlehweD. (eds), Grenzenlose Kontrolle? Organisatorischer Wandel und politische Macht multinationaler Unternehmen (Berlin: Edition Sigma), pp. 45–70.
30.
ForsgrenM. (1990) Managing the international multi-centre firm: Case studies from Sweden, European Management Journal, 8(2): 261–267.
31.
ForsgrenM.HolmU.JohansonJ. (2005) Managing the Embedded Multinational: A Business Network View (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar).
32.
GalunicD.C.EisenhardtK.M. (1996) The evolution of intracorporate domains: Divisional charter losses in high-technology multidivisonal corporations, Organization Science, 7(3): 255–282.
33.
GeppertM.ClarkE. (2003) Knowledge and learning in transnational ventures: An actor-centred approach, Management Decision, 41(5): 433–442.
34.
HankéB. (2000) European works councils and industrial restructuring in the European automotive industry, European Journal of Industrial Relations, 6(1): 35–59.
35.
HarveyM.G.NovicevicM.M.SpeierC. (1999) Inpatriate managers: How to increase the probability of success, Human Resource Management Review, 9(1): 151–181.
36.
HarzingA.-W. (1999) Managing the Multinationals: An International Study of Control Mechanisms (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar).
37.
HicksonD.J.HiningsC.R.LeeC.A.SchneckR.E.PenningsJ.M. (1971) A strategic contingencies' theory of intraorganizational power, Adminstrative Science Quarterly, 16(2): 216–229.
38.
HillC.W.HittM.R.HoskissonR.E. (1992) Cooperative vs. competitive structures in related and unrelated diversified firms, Organizatioin Science, 3: 501–521.
39.
HumesS. (1993) Managing the Multinational: Confronting the Global–local Dilemma (New York: Prentice Hall).
40.
KimW.C.MauborgneR.A. (1993) Procedural justice, attitudes, and subsidiary top management compliance with multinationals' corporate strategic decisions, Academy of Management Journal, 36(3): 502–526.
41.
KolkA.Van TulderR.WeltersC. (1999) International codes of conduct and corporate social responsibility: Can transnational corporations regulate themselves?, Transnational Corporations, 8(1): 143–180.
42.
KristensenP.H.ZeitlinJ. (2005) Local Players in Global Games: The Strategic Constitution of a Multinational Corporation (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
43.
LallS. (1996) Transnational corporations and economic development, in DunningJ. H.SauvantK. P. (eds), Transnational Corporations and World Development (London: International Thomson Business Press), pp. 44–74.
44.
LoveridgeR. (2006) Embedding the multinational enterprise: The micro-processes of institutionalisation in developing economies, in GeppertM.MayerM. (eds), Global, National and Local Practices in Multinational Companies (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan), pp. 189–220.
45.
LuoY. (2005). Toward coopetition within a multinational enterprise: A perspective from foreign subsidiaries, Journal of World Business, 40: 71–90.
46.
MarchJ.G. (1962) The business firm as a political coalition, Journal of Politics, 24: 662–678.
47.
MooreF. (2006) Strategy, power and negotiation: Social control and expatriate managers in a German multinational corporation, International Journal of Human Resource Management, 17(3): 399–413.
48.
MorganG.KristensenP.H. (2006) The contested space of multinationals: Varieties of institutionalism, varieties of capitalism, Human Relations, 59(11): 1467–1490.
49.
NohriaN.GhoshalS. (1997) The Differentiated Network: Organizing Multinational Corporations for Value Creation (San Francisco: Jossey-Bass).
50.
PetersonR.B.NapierN.ShimW.S. (1996) Expatriate management: The differential role of national multinational corporation ownership, International Executive, 38(5): 543–562.
51.
PetersonR.B.NapierN.ShimW.S. (2000) Expatriate management: A comparison of MNCs across four parent countries, Thunderbird International Business Review, 42: 145–166.
RosenzweigP.H.SinghJ.V. (1991) Organizational environments and the multinational enterprise, Academy of Management Review, 16(2): 340–361.
54.
RuigrokW.WagnerH. (2005) Internationale Standortverlagerung und Mitarbeiterproduktivität: Eine empirische Untersuchung deutscher Industrieunternehmen, Zeitschrift für betriebswirtschaftliche Forschung, (Juni): 310–324.
55.
RuigrokW.AchtenhagenL.WagnerM.Ruegg-StürmJ. (2003) ABB: Beyond the G matrix towards the network multidividional organization, in GooderhamP. N.NordhaugO. (eds), International Management: Cross–boundary Challenges (Malden, MA: Blackwell), pp. 64–86.
56.
SchmidS.KretschmerK. (2006) Performance evaluation of foreign subsidiaries: A contingency framework, working paper no. 18 (Berlin: Europäische Wirtschaftshochschule ESCP-EAP).
57.
SchreiberJ.J. Servant (1967) Le Défi Américain (Paris: Denoel).
58.
SölvellÖ.ZanderI. (1998) International diffusion of knowledge: Isolating mechanisms and the role of the MNE, in ChandlerA.HagströmP.SölvellÖ. (eds), The Dynamic Firm: The Role of Technology, Strategy, Organization, and Regions (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 402–417.
59.
StopfordJ.StrangeS. (1991) Rival States, Rival Firms: Competition for World Market Shares (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
60.
SurlemontB. (1998) A typology of centres within multinational corporations: An empirical investigation in: BirkinshawJ.HoodN. (eds), Multinational Corporate Evolution and Subsidiary Development (Basingstoke: Macmillan Press), pp. 162–188.
61.
TempelA. (2001) The Cross-national Transfer of Human Resource Management Practices in German and British Multinational Companies (Munich-Mering: Rainer Hampp Verlag).
62.
TurnerL. (2006) Globalization and the logic of participation: Unions and the politics of coalition building, Journal of industrial Relations, 48(1): 83–97.
63.
VernonR. (1971) Sovereignty at Bay: The Multinational Spread of US Enterprises (New York: Basic Books).
64.
WestneyD.E. (1993) Institutionalization theory and the multinational corporation, in GhoshalS.WestneyD. E. (eds), Organization Theory and the Multinational Corporation (New York: St. Martin's Press), pp. 53–76.
65.
WhiteR.E.PoynterT.A. (1984) Strategies for foreign-owned subsidiaries in Canada, Business Quarterly, 49(2): 59–69.
66.
WortmannM. (2008) Komplex und global: Strategien und Strukturen multinationaler Unternehmen (Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften).
67.
WortmannM.DörrenbächerC.BochumUMeißnerH.R.GohdeH. (1999) Solidarity across Borders: Relocation of Production Sites and European Works Councils (Brussels: EGA/AFETT).
