This article examines the introduction of shareholder value in the German business system. Its main argument is that the idea of shareholder value has been introduced and adopted in different ways by German firms. Divergences are identified both at the discursive level and at the level of organisational structures and practices of corporate governance. They can be understood by applying translation theory to the adoption process. The main tenet of translation theory is that ideas are constantly being modified when they enter new contexts, mainly due to the diversity of actors involved in the process of translation. Translation theory therefore goes beyond traditional diffusion studies, which tend to assume a linear and homogeneous transmission of ideas. The analysis of two German firms, DaimlerChrysler and Volkswagen AG, lends support to the explanatory potency of translation theory.
AgliettaM. (2000) Shareholder value and corporate governance: Some tricky questions, Economy and Society, 29(1): 146–159.
2.
AguileraR.JacksonG. (2003) The cross-national diversity of corporate governance: Dimensions and determinants, Academy of Management Review, 28(3): 447–465.
3.
AokiM. (2000) Information, Corporate Governance, and Institutional Diversity (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
4.
BallR. (2004) Corporate governance and financial reporting at Daimler-Benz (DaimlerChrysler) AG: From a ‘stakeholder’ toward a shareholder value' model, Economics and Politics of Accounting, pp. 103–45.
5.
BlythM. (2002) Great Transformations: Economic Ideas and Institutional Change in the Twentieth Century (New York: Cambridge University Press).
6.
BrunerR.ChristmannP.SpekmanR. (1998) Daimler-Benz AG: Negotiations Between Daimler and Chrysler (Charlottesville, VA: University of Virginia Darden School Foundation).
7.
BuckT.ShahrimA. (2005) The translation of corporate governance changes across national cultures: The case of Germany, Journal of International Business Studies, 36: 42–61.
8.
CampbellJ. (2004) Institutional Change and Globalization (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).
9.
CampbellJ. (2005) Where do we stand? Common mechanisms in organizations and social movements research, in DavisG.McAdamD.ScottR.ZaldM. (eds), Social Movements and Organization Theory (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 41–69.
10.
ChandlerA. (1962) Strategy and Structure: Chapters in the History of the American Industrial Enterprise (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
11.
ClarkI. (2006) Another third way? VW and the trials of stakeholder capitalism, Industrial Relations Journal, 37(6): 593–606.
12.
CrouchC. (2005) Capitalist Diversity and Change: Recombinant Governance and Institutional Entrepreneurs (New York: Oxford University Press).
13.
CzarniawskaB.JoergesB. (1996) Travel of ideas, in CzarniawskaB.SevonG. (eds), Translating Organizational Change (Berlin: Walter De Gruyter & Co), pp. 13–49.
14.
CzarniawskaB.SevonG. (eds) (1996) Translating Organizational Change (Berlin: Walter De Gruyter & Co).
15.
CzarniawskaB.SevonG. (eds) (2005) Translation is a vehicle, imitation its motor, and fashion sits at the wheel, in CzarniawskaB.SevonG. (eds), Global Ideas: How Ideas, Objects and Practices Travel in the Global Economy (Sweden: Liber & Copenhagen Business School Press).
16.
Daimler-Benz/DaimlerChryslerAG, (1996–2006) Annual Reports 1995–2005, English-language Version (Stuttgart: Daimler-Benz AG).
17.
DeakinS.SinghA. (2006) Shareholder value reconsidered, paper presented at the CBR Innovation and Governance summit, University of Cambridge.
18.
DeegR. (1999) Finance Capitalism Unveiled: Banks and the German Political Economy (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press).
19.
DeegR. (2005) Change from within: German and Italian finance in the 1990s, in StreeckW.ThelenK. (eds), Beyond Continuity: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies (New York: Oxford University Press), pp. 169–202.
20.
ElsterJ. (1989) Nuts and Bolts for the Social Sciences (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
FissP.ZajacE. (2004) The diffusion of ideas over contested terrain: The (non-) adoption of a shareholder value orientation among German firms, Administrative Science Quarterly, 49: 501–534.
26.
FoudyJ. (2001) Shareholder value and the German and Japanese models: A case study of the automobile sector, paper presented at the Comparative Political Economy of Developed and Less Developed Countries conference, Yale Center for International and Area Studies, Yale University.
27.
GoyerM. (2006) Varieties of institutional investors and national models of capitalism: The transformation of corporate governance in France and Germany, Politics and Society, 34(3): 399–430.
28.
GoyerM. (2007) Capital mobility, varieties of institutional investors, and the transforming stability of corporate governance in France and Germany, in HanckéR.RhodesM.ThatcherM. (eds), Beyond Varieties of Capitalism: Conflict, Contradictions and Complementarities in the European Economy (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 195–222.
29.
HallP.SoskiceD. (eds) (2001) Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage (New York: Oxford University Press).
30.
HanckéR.RhodesM.ThatcherM. (eds) (2007) Beyond Varieties of Capitalism: Conflict, Contradictions and Complementarities in the European Economy (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
31.
HoepnerM. (2001) Corporate governance in transition: Ten empirical findings on shareholder value and industrial relations in Germany, MPIfG Discussion Paper 2001/05 (Köln: Max Planck Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung).
32.
HollingerD. (1980) The problem of pragmatism in American history, Journal of American History, 67(1): 88–107.
33.
HoptK. (1998) Comparative Corporate Governance: The State of the Art and Emerging Research (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
JacksonG. (2005) Contested boundaries: Ambiguity and creativity in the evolution of German codetermination, in StreeckW.ThelenK. (eds), Beyond Continuity: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies (New York: Oxford University Press), pp. 229–254.
39.
JuergensU. (2002) Corporate governance, innovation and economic performance: A case study on Volkswagen, Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung GmbH (WZB).
40.
JuergensU.LungY.VolpatoG.FrigantV. (2002) The arrival of shareholder value in the European auto industry: A case study of four car makers, Competition & Change, 6(1): 61–80.
41.
JuergensU.NaumannK.RuppJ. (2000) Shareholder value in an adverse environment: The German case, Economy and Society, 29(1): 54–79.
42.
LaneC. (2005) Institutional transformation and system change: Changes in the corporate governance of German corporations, in MorganG.WhitleyR.MoenE. (eds), Changing Capitalisms? Internationalization, Institutional Change, and Systems of Economic Organization (New York: Oxford University Press), pp. 78–109.
43.
LazonickW.O'SullivanM. (2000) Maximizing shareholder value: A new ideology for corporate governance, Economy and Society, 29(1): 13–35.
44.
PowellW.GammalD.SimardC. (2005) Close encounters: The circulation and reception of managerial practices in the San Fransisco Bay Area nonprofit community, in CzarniawskaB.SevonG. (eds), Global Ideas: How Ideas, Objects and Practices Travel in the Global Economy (Sweden: Liber & Copenhagen Business School Press), pp. 233–258.
45.
RaginC. (1987) The Comparative Method: Moving Beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies (Berkeley: University of California Press).
46.
RogersE. (2003) Diffusion of Innovations (New York: Free Press).
47.
Sahlin-AnderssonK. (1996) Imitating by editing success: The construction of organizational fields, in CzarniawskaB.SevonG. (eds), Translating Organizational Change (Berlin: Walter De Gruyter & Co), pp. 69–91.
48.
SolliR.DemediukP.SimsR. (2005) The namesake: On best value and other reform marks, in CzarniawskaB.SevonG. (eds), Global Ideas: How Ideas, Objects and Practices Travel in the Global Economy (Sweden: Liber & Copenhagen Business School Press), pp. 30–47.
49.
StrangD.MacyM. (2001) In search of excellence: Fads, success stories, and adaptive emulation, American Journal of Sociology, 107: 147–182.
50.
SturdyA. (2004) The adoption of management ideas and practices: Theoretical perspectives and possibilities, Management Learning, 35(2): 155–179.
51.
VitolsS. (2005) Changes in Germany's bank-based financial system: Implications for corporate governance, Corporate Governance: An International Review, 13(3): 386–396.
52.
VolkswagenAG, (1996–2006) Annual Reports 1995–2005, English-language Version (Wolfsburg: Volkswagen AG).
