Strategic mine planning and the management of the future cash flows are a vital core of surface mining operations. The time dimension, which is an integral part of the scheduling problem, is not embedded in traditional ultimate pit outline optimisation algorithms. This study explores the validity of the theorem that a pit outline determined by an optimal long term schedule algorithm is constrained by the conventional Lerchs and Grossmann's (LG) optimised pit outline. This hypothesis was investigated through a case study using the intelligent open pit simulator (IOPS) founded on agent based learning theories. The optimal pushback schedule was determined using IOPS before determination of the optimised final pit outline. The economic block values were discounted with respect to the allocated extraction time, followed by final pit limits optimisation using LG algorithm.
LerchsH. and GrossmannI. F.: ‘Optimum design of open-pit mines’, Can. Mining Metall. Bull., Trans., CIM, 1965, LXVIII, 17–24.
2.
ZhaoY. and KimY. C.: ‘A new optimum pit limit design algorithm’, Proc. 23rd APCOM Symp., Littleton, CO, USA, 1992, University of Arizona, SME, 423–434.
3.
YegulalpT. M. and AriasJ. A.: ‘A fast algorithm to solve the ultimate pit limit problem’, Proc. 23rd APCOM Symp., Littleton, CO, USA, 1992, AIME, 391–397.
4.
JohnsonT. B. and BarnesR. J.: ‘Application of the maximal flow algorithm to ultimate pit design’, (ed. LevaryR. R.), xv, 713, 1988; New York, NY, North-Holland.
5.
WhittleJ.: ‘The facts and fallacies of open-pit design’, Manuscript, Whittle Programming Pty Ltd, North Balwyn, Victoria, Australia, 1989.
6.
TolwinskiB. and UnderwoodR.: ‘An algorithm to estimate the optimal evolution of an open pit mine’, Proc. 23rd APCOM Symp., Littleton, CO, USA, 1992, University of Arizona, SME, 399–409.
7.
ElveliB.: ‘Open pit mine design and extraction sequencing by use OR and AI concepts’, Int. J. Surface Min., Reclamat. Environ., 1995, 9, 149–153.
8.
DenbyB., SchofieldD. and HunterG.: ‘Genetic algorithms for open pit scheduling - extension into 3-dimensions’, Proc. 5th Int. Symp. on ‘Mine planning and equipment selection’, Sao Paulo, Brazil, 1996, A. A. Balkema/Rotterdam/Brookfield, 177–186.
9.
ErarslanK. and CelebiN.: ‘A simulative model for optimum open pit design’, Can. Mining Metall. Bull., 2001, 94, 59–68.
10.
CaccettaL. and HillS. P.: ‘An application of branch and cut to open pit mine scheduling’, J. Global Optimizat., 2003, 27, 349–365.
11.
DagdelenK. and KawahataK.: ‘Oppurtunities in multi-mine planning through large scale mixed integer linear programming optimization’, Proc. 33rd Int. Symp. on ‘Computer application in the minerals industry (APCOM)’, Santiago, Chile, 2007, GECAMIN LTDA, 337–342.
12.
RamazanS. and DimitrakopoulosR.: ‘Traditional and new MIP models for production scheduling with in-situ grade variability’, Int. J. Surf. Min., Reclamat. Environ., 2004, 18, 85–98.
13.
RamazanS., DagdelenK. and JohnsonT. B.: ‘Fundamental tree algorithm in optimising production scheduling for open pit mine design’, Mining Technol.: IMM Trans. Section A, 2005, 114, 45–54.
14.
CaccettaL. and HillS. P.: ‘An application of branch and cut to open pit mine scheduling’, J. Global Optimizat., 2003, 27, 349–365.
15.
DogbeG. and FrimpongS.: ‘Integrated open pit optimization with periodic material scheduling’, Proc. CIM Mining Industry Conf. Exhibit., Edmonton, Canada, 2004, CD ROM.
16.
Askari-NasabH.: ‘Intelligent 3D interactive open pit mine planning and optimization’, PhD thesis, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada, 2006.
17.
Askari-NasabH., FrimpongS. and Awuah-OffeiK.: ‘Intelligent optimal production scheduling estimator’, Proc. 32nd Application of Computers and Operation Research in the Mineral Industry, Tucson, AZ, USA, 2005, Taylor & Francis Group, 279–285.
18.
Askari-NasabH., FrimpongS. and SzymanksiJ.: ‘Modeling open pit dynamics using discrete simulation’, Int. J. Mining, Reclamat. Environ., 2007, 21, 35–49.
19.
Askari-NasabH. and SzymanskiJ.: ‘Open pit production scheduling using reinforcement learning’, Proc. 33rd Int. Symp. on ‘Computer application in the minerals industry (APCOM)’, Santiago, Chile, 2007, GECAMIN LTDA, 321–326.
20.
Askari-NasabH., FrimpongS. and SzymanksiJ.: ‘Investigating the continuous time open pit dynamics’, J. South Afr. Inst. Mining Metall., 2008, 108, 61–73.
21.
SuttonR. S. and BartoA. G.: ‘Reinforcement learning, an introduction’, 432; 1998, Cambridge, MA, The MIT Press.
22.
Askari-NasabH., Awuah-OffeiK. and FrimpongS.: ‘Stochastic simulation of open pit pushbacks with a production simulator’, Proc. CIM Mining Industry Conf. Exhibit., Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, 2004, CD-ROM.
23.
WooldridgeM.: ‘An introduction to multi-agent systems’, 348; 2002, Chichester, John Wiley and Sons Limited.
24.
MurariuV. and SvobodaJ.: ‘The applicability of Davis tube tests to ore separation by drum magnetic separators’, Phys. Separat. Sci. Eng., 2003, 12, 1–11.
25.
DeutschC. V.: ‘Geostatistical reservoir modeling’, 162–166; 2002, New York, NY, Oxford University Press.
