HameroffS. R., KaszniakA. W., and ScottA. C.(ed.): ‘Toward a science of consciousness. The first Tucson discussions and debates’; 1996, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press(hereinafter Tucson I).
2.
HameroffS. R., KaszniakA. W., and ScottA. C.(ed.): ‘Toward a science of consciousness. The second Tucson discussions and debates’; 1998, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press(hereinafter Tucson II).
3.
ChalmersD. J.: ‘Facing up to the problem of consciousness’, in Tucson I, 5–28.
4.
DennettD. C.: ‘The myth of double transduction’, in Tucson II, 97–108.
5.
ChurchlandP. S.: ‘Brainshy: nonneural theories of conscious experience’, in Tucson II, 109–126.
6.
GrayJ. A.: ‘The mind-brain identity theory as a scientific hypothesis’, Philos. Q., 1971, 21, 247–253.
7.
ChalmersD. J.: ‘The conscious mind’; 1996, New York, NY, Oxford University Press.
8.
HameroffS. R. and PenroseR.: ‘Orchestrated reduction of quantum coherence in brain microtubules: a model for consciousness’, in Tucson I, 507–540.
9.
NunnC. M. H., ClarkeC. J. S., and BlottB. H.: ‘Collapse of a quantum field may affect brain function’, in Tucson I, 331–336.
10.
GrayJ. A.: ‘Creeping up on the hard question of consciousness’, in Tucson II, 279–292.
11.
KochC.: ‘The neuroanatomy of visual consciousness’, in ‘Advances in neurology’, Vol. 77: ‘Consciousness: at the frontiers of neuroscience’, (ed. JaspersH. H., DescarriesL., CastelluciV. F., and RossignolS.), 229–244; 1998, Philadelphia, PA, Lippincott-Raven.
12.
SearleJ. R.: ‘How to study consciousness scientifically’, in Tucson II, 15–30.
13.
LogothetisN. K. and LeopoldD. A.: ‘Single-neuron activity and visual perception’, in Tucson II, 309–320.
14.
KochC.: ‘Toward the neuronal substrate of visual consciousness’, in Tucson I, 247–258.
15.
GreenfieldS. A.: ‘A Rosetta stone for mind and brain’, in Tucson II, 231–236.
16.
VelmansM.: ‘Is human information processing conscious?’, Behav. Brain Sci., 1991, 14, 651–726.
17.
PhillipsM. L., WilliamsL., YoungA. W., AndrewC., BullmoreE. T., BrammerM. J., WilliamsS. C. R., MorganM., and GrayJ. A.: ‘A differential neural response to overt and covert presentations of facial expressions of fear and disgust’, paper in preparation.