This paper discusses our work conducting reader studies with prototypical reading interfaces designed in the context of funded Digital Humanities (DH) research projects. We discuss our conceptual and methodological approaches and contemplate which methods have been most productive in advancing our understandings of reading practices and interfaces. To situate this discussion, we first contemplate ways in which reading and new reading interfaces have been conceptualized by audiences within and beyond academia through the period of the emergence of digital environments for reading, and consider the merits of nuanced approaches that acknowledge the diversity of readers and reading practices.
BayneSiân, and RossJen. 2007. The ‘digital native’ and ‘digital immigrant’: a dangerous opposition. In Annual Conference of the Society for Research into Higher Education.Brighton, UK.
2.
BrownMonica, DobsonTeresa, GrueDustin, and RueckerStan. 2013. Challenging new views on familiar plotlines: A discussion of the use of XML in the development of a scholarly tool for literary pedagogy.Literary and Linguistic Computing28: 199–208.
3.
BrownTim.2009. Change by Design: How Design Thinking Transforms Organizations and Inspires Innovation.New York: Colins Business.
4.
ChoudhurySuparna, and McKinneyKelly A.. 2013. Digital media, the developing brain and the interpretive plasticity of neuroplasticity. Transcultural Psychiatry50(2): 192–215.
5.
ConstanzaJean-Louis. 2011. A magazine is an iPad that does not work. YouTube video posted by UserExperiencesWorks.www.youtube.com/watch?v=aXV-yaFmQNk.
6.
DobsonTeresa M.2006. The Love of a Good Narrative: Textuality and Digitality.English Teaching: Practice and Critique5: 56–68.
7.
DobsonTeresa M., MichuraPiotr, RueckerStan, BrownMonica, and RodriguezOmar. 2011. Interactive Visualizations of Plot in Fiction.Visible Language45: 169–91.
8.
DobsonTeresa M., and WillinskyJohn. 2009. Digital literacy. In The Cambridge handbook of literacy eds, OlsonDavid and TorrenceNancy, 286–312. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9.
DobsonTeresa M., and MillerJeff. 2002–4. Text technologies: The changing spaces of reading and writing. [Courseware.]Vancouver, B.C.: The University of British Columbia.
10.
FrizzeraLuciano, RadzikowskaMilena, RoederGeoff, PeñaErnesto, DobsonTeresa, RueckerStan, RockwellGeoffrey, and BrownSusan. 2013. Visual workflow interfaces for editorial processes.Literary and Linguistic Computing28: 615–28.
11.
GaleyAlan, and RueckerStan. 2010. How a prototype argues.Literary and Linguistic Computing25: 405–24.
12.
GreenbaumJoan M., and KyngMorten. 1991. Design at Work: Cooperative Design of Computer Systems. Mahwah, New Jersey: Erlbaum.
13.
GrueDustin, DobsonTeresa M., and BrownMonica. 2013. Reading practices and digital experiences: An investigation into secondary students’ reading practices and XML-markup experiences of fiction. Literary and Linguistic Computing28(2): 237–48.
14.
HaylesN. Katherine. 2012. How We Think: Digital Media and Contemporary Technogenesis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
15.
JabrFerris. 2013. The reading brain in the digital age: the science of paper versus screens.Scientific Americanll(4).
16.
Luce-KaplerRebecca. 2006. The sideshadow interview: illuminating process. International Journal of Qualitative Methods5(1): 1–16.
17.
MyersMargaret. 2000. Qualitative research and the generalizability question: Standing firm with Proteus.The Qualitative Report4: 1–9.
18.
MonereoCarles. 2004. The virtual construction of the mind: the role of educational psychology.Interactive Educational Multimedia9: 32–47.
19.
MunhallPatricia L.1989. Philosophical ponderings on qualitative research methods in nursing.Nursing Science Quarterly2: 20–28.
MidgleyWarren, DanaherPatrick Alan, and BaguleyMargaret, eds. 2013. The Role of Participants in Education Research: Ethics, Epistemologies, and Methods. Vol. 87. London: Routledge.
22.
PrenskyMarc. 2001. Digital natives, digital immigrants part 1.On The Horizon9: 1–6
23.
RueckerStan, RadzikowskaMilena, and SinclairStéfan. 2011. Visual Interface Design for Digital Cultural Heritage: A Guide to Rich-Prospect Browsing. Surrey: Ashgate Publishing, Ltd.
24.
SchulerDouglas, and NamiokaAki. 1993. Participatory Design: Principles and Practices. New Jersey: L. Erlbaum Associates Inc.
SharonAmiel T.1973. What do adults read?Reading Research Quarterly9(2): 148–69.
27.
ShieldsCarol Diggory. 2001. Dressing up for the Carnival. New York: Penguin.
28.
StraussWilliam, and HoweNeil. 2000. Millennials Rising: The Next Great Generation. New York: Random House LLC.
29.
TenopirCarol, KingDonald W., SpencerJesse, and WuLei. 2009. Variations in article seeking and reading patterns of academics: What makes a difference?Library & Information Science Research31: 139–48.
