We argue that high-resolution naturalistic digital images of physical objects are oriented to in a very different manner than other visual representations such as ‘inscriptions’ which are manufactured by black-box devices in order to transform phenomena into diagrams, or ‘rendering practices’ where scientists visually transform the meaning of objects and events using representational techniques to select information and simplify its presentation. We show that medieval music scholars engage with high-resolution images of physical objects through crossmodal practices relying upon the interconnected senses to examine a variety of properties held within physical objects when they are displayed within digital images.
BailesFreya.2009. Translating the musical image: case studies of expert musicians. In Sounds in translation: intersections of music, technology and society, eds. ChanAmy and NobleAlistair,41–58. Canberra: Australian National University.
2.
BaudrillardJean.1994. Simulacra and Simulation, Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
3.
ClassenConstance.1997. Foundations for an anthropology of the senses. International Social Science Journal, 153: 401–412.
Craig-McFeelyJulia, and LockAlan.2006. DIAMM Digital Restoration Workbook. Oxford: Oxford Select Specialist Catalogue Publications.
6.
de la FlorG., OjaghiM., MartínezI., JirotkaM., WilliamsM., BlakeboroughT.2010a. Reconfiguring practice: the interdependence of experimental procedure and computing infrastructure in distributed earthquake engineering. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, A368: 4073–4088.
7.
de la FlorGrace, JirotkaMarina, LuffPaul, PybusJohn and KirkhamRuth.2010b. Transforming scholarly practice: embedding technological interventions to support the collaborative analysis of ancient texts. Journal of Computer Supported Cooperative Work19(3/4): 309–334
FeldSteven, FoxAaron A., PorcelloThomas and SamuelsDavid.2004. Vocal Anthropology: From the Music of Language to the Language of Song. In A Companion to Linguistic Anthropology, ed DurantiAlessandro,321–345. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
10.
FeldSteven and FoxAaron A.1994. Music and Language. Annual Review of Anthropology23: 25–53.
11.
GarfinkelHarold.1967. Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice–Hall.
12.
GoodwinCharles.1997. The Blackness of Black: Color Categories as Situated Practice. In Discourse, Tools and Reasoning: Essays on Situated Cognition, eds. ResnickLauren B., SäljöRoger, PontecorvoClotilde, & BurgeBarbara, 111–140. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer.
13.
HineChristine.2006. Computerization Movements and Scientific Disciplines: The Reflexive Potential of New Technologies. In New Infrastructures for Knowledge Production: Understanding e-Science, edited by HineChristine,26–47. London: Information Science Publishing.
HowesDavid. ed.1991. The varieties of sensory experience: A sourcebook in the Anthropology of the senses. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
16.
IhdeDon.1976. Listening and voice: phenomenologies of sound. Albany, N.Y: SUNY Press.
17.
JirotkaMarina, ProcterRob, HartswoodMark, SlackRoger, SimpsonAndrew, CoopmansCatelijne, HindsChris and VossAlex.2005. Requirements for Collaboration and Trust in Healthcare Innovation: The eDiaMoND Case Study. Journal of Computer Supported Cooperative Work14(3): 369–398.
18.
Knorr CetinaKarin.1992. The Couch, the Cathedral and the Lab: On the Relationship between Experiment and Laboratory Science. In Science as Practice and Culture, edited by PickeringAndrew,113–138. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
19.
LatourBruno and WoolgarSteve.1979. Laboratory life: the construction of scientific facts. Beverly Hills: Sage.
20.
Lévi-StraussClaude.1970. Fugue of the Five Senses. In The raw and the cooked: introduction to a science of mythology, ed. Lévi-StraussClaude,147–63. London: Jonathan Cape.
21.
LowKelvin, E.Y.2005. Ruminations on Smell as a Sociocultural Phenomenon. Current Sociology53: 397–417.
22.
LuffPaul, HindmarshJon and HeathChristian. eds.2000. Workplace Studies Recovering Work Practice and Informing System Design. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press.
23.
LynchMichael.1985. Discipline and the material form of images: An analysis of scientific visibility. Social Studies of Science15: 37–66.
24.
LynchMichael.2006. Cognitive activities without cognition? ethnomethodological investigations of selected ‘cognitive’ topics. Discourse Studies8(1): 95–104.
25.
ModyCyrus C. M.2005. The sounds of science: Listening to laboratory practice. Science Technology & Human Values30(2): 175–98.
26.
MyersNatasha.2008. Molecular Embodiments and the Body-work of Modeling in Protein Crystallography. Social Studies of Science38(2): 163–99.
PorcelloThomas, MeintjesLouise, Maria OchoaAna, and SamuelsDavid W.2010. The Reorganization of the Sensory World. Annual Review of Anthropology39: 51–66.
29.
RobertsonToni.1997. Cooperative work and lived cognition: A taxonomy of embodied actions. Paper presented at the 5th European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work. Lancaster, UK, September, 7–11.
30.
SacksHarvey, SchegloffEmanuel A., and JeffersonGail.1974. A simplest systematics of the organization of turn-taking in conversation. Language50(4): 696–735.
31.
SchreibmanSusan, SiemensRay and UnsworthJohn. eds.2004. A companion to digital humanities. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
32.
SeegerCharles.1951. Systematic Musicology: Viewpoints, Orientations, and Methods. Journal of the American Musicological Society4(3): 240.248.
SuchmanLucy.1993. Technologies of Accountability: Of Lizards and Aeroplanes. In Technology in Working Order. Edited by ButtonGraham,113–126. London: Routledge.
35.
TerrasMelissa.2006. Image to Interpretation: An Intelligent System to Aid Historians in Reading the Vindolanda Texts. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
