We present astronomers’ native visualization as techniques for representing and analyzing both the universe and their own social world. From our ongoing study we also present our preliminary ethnographic maps of the bundle of relationships used by women, minorities and foreign-born researchers to build careers in the field of astronomy. We discuss three ways of knowing visually. While the astronomers’ visualizations are based upon discrete entities, ours show a bundle of ties (meshworks) through which astronomers are constituted as such. Our goal is to bridge STS and power analytics from gender, ethnic, and Critical Race Studies.
BoltanskiLuc and ChiapelloEve.1999. Le nouvel esprit du capitalisme. Gallimard: Paris.
4.
ContiAlberto.2011. The Astronomer's H–R Diagram. Poster presented to the American Astronomical Society, AAS Meeting #217, #145.01; Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society, Vol. 43, 2011. Personal blog referenced at http://blog.albertoconti.com/the-h-r-diagram-of-astronomers-from-theory-to.
5.
CrenshawKimberle.1991. Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence against Women of Color. Stanford Law Review43(6): 1241–1299.
6.
DumitJoseph.2004. Picturing Personhood: Brain Scans and Biomedical Identity. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
7.
EscobarArturo.2008. Territories of Difference: Place, Movements, Life. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
8.
HarawayDonna.1991. Situated Knowledges: The Science Question. In Simians, Cyborgs, and Women. The Reinvention of Nature. New York: Routledge.
9.
HarawayDonna.1991. A Cyborg Manifesto: Science, Technology, and Socialist–Feminism in the Late Twentieth Century. In Simians, Cyborgs and Women.The Reinvention of Nature. New York: Routledge.
10.
IngoldTim.2001. The Perception of the Environment: Essays on Livelihood, Dwelling and Skill. London: Routledge.
11.
IngoldTim.2007. Writing texts, reading materials. A response to my critics in Archaeological Dialogues, 14(1): 31–38. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12.
JurisJeffrey S.2008. Networking Futures: the movements against corporate globalization. Durham: Duke University Press.
13.
LynchMichael and WoolgarSteven.1990. Representation in scientific practice. 1st ed. Cambridge Mass.: MIT Press.
PaulitzTanja.2003. Productive Differences — Virtual Networks call for Heterogeneity. In: Agents of Change: Virtuality, Gender, and the Challenge to the Traditional University. Ed KreutznerGabriele;Schelhowe, Heidi. Opladen, 05–218.
18.
SandovalChela.2000. Methodology of the oppressed. University of Minnesota Press.
19.
SundbergM.2012. Creating Convincing Simulations in Astrophysics. Forthcoming in Science, Technology and Human Values37(1).
20.
TraweekSharon.1988a. Beamtimes and Lifetimes. Cambridge Mass.: Harvard University Press.
21.
TraweekSharon.1998b.Iconic Devices: Toward An Ethnography of Physics Images. In: Cyborgs and Citadels, edited by DowneyGary and DumitJoseph.School of American Research Series, University of Washington Press.
22.
TraweekSharon.2000. ‘Faultlines or How Modern Became Retro: an historical political economy of knowledge’, for Doing Science + Culture: How Cultural and Interdisciplinary Studies Are Changing the Way We Look at Science and Medicine, eds. TraweekSharon and ReidRoddey.Routledge.
23.
TraweekSharon.2005. Generating High Energy Physics in Japan: Moral imperatives of a Future Pluperfect. In Pedagogy and the Practice of Science: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives, ed. KaiserDavid.MIT, 357–392.
24.
TraweekSharon.2011. Keizu to Nendaiki: Making History in Tsukuba Science City. City as Target, eds. BishopRyan and ClanceyGregory.Routledge.
