Article Commentary: Whose literature is science?

Maddox J. : ‘What is the scientific literature?’, Nature, 1986, 322, 681.

Hayes D. P. : ‘The growing inaccessibility of science’, Nature, 1992, 356, 739–740.

Maddox J. : ‘Why the pressure to publish?’, Nature, 1988, 333, 493.

Knight J. : ‘Clear as mud’, Nature, 2003, 423, 376–378.

Gopen G. D. and Swan J. A. : ‘The science of scientific writing’, American Scientist, 1990, 78, 550–558.

Bazerman C. : ‘Physicists reading physics: schema-laden purposes and purpose-laden schemas’, in Shaping Written Knowledge: The Genre and Activity of the Experimental Article in Science, 235–256; 1988, Madison, WI, University of Wisconsin Press.

Charney D. : ‘A study in rhetorical reading: how evolutionists read “The spandrels of San Marco”’, in Understanding Scientific Prose, (ed. Selzer J. ), 208–231; 1993, Madison, WI, University of Wisconsin Press.

Mcnamara D. S. and Kintsch W. : ‘Learning from texts: effects of prior knowledge and text coherence’, Discourse Processes, 1996, 22, 247–288; D. S. Mcnamara, E, Kintsch, N. B. Songer and W. Kintsch: ‘Are good texts always better? Interactions of text coherence, background knowledge, and levels of understanding in learning from text’, Cognition and Instruction, 1996, 14, 1–43.

Mcnamara D. S. : ‘Reading both high-coherence and low-coherence texts: effects of text sequence and prior knowledge’, Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 2000, 55, 51–62. See also papers cited in Note 8.

Morgan P. P. : ‘How to get a rejected manuscript published’, Canadian Medical Association Journal, 985, 133, 86–87.

Maddox J. : ‘What is the scientific literature?’ (see Note 1).