This paper has two primary objectives. First, it addresses the development of an iconography for electrical phenomena in the eighteenth century, showing how scientific progress influenced artistic images, and how, eventually, Franklin's revolutionary discovery that lightning is an electric discharge made it possible to use a zigzag line (already used at the time as the iconographic symbol for lightning) as a sign for electricity. Second, it investigates the creation and evolution of conventions for scientific illustrations. The following original argument is also introduced: that the stylistic ideals of Classicism influenced scientific illustration in the period around 1800.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
For exampleFrizotM.: ‘Neue Geschichte der Fotografie’, 272–284; 1998, Cologne, Könemann.
2.
StelzerO.: ‘Die Vorgeschichte der abstrakten Kunst’, 68–76; 1964, Munich, R. Piper.
3.
For a general introduction seeKlossA.: ‘Von der Electricität zur Elektrizität’; 1987, Basel, Birkhäuser. See also P. Fara: ‘An entertainment for angels: electricity in the Enlightenment’; 2002, Cambridge, Icon.
4.
We do not discuss the few illustrations of luminescent effects similar to those created by Francis Hauksbee. One of the rare representations can be found in A. Nollet: ‘Lettres sur l’électricité’, 152, Plate 1; 1753, Paris, Hippolyte Louis Guerin and Louis François Delatour.
5.
RiethA.: ‘Der Blitz in der bildenden Kunst’; 1954, Munich, E. Heimeran; A. Winter-Fritsche ‘ “Naturgetreue” Blitzdarstellungen in der venezianischen Malerei des 16. Jahrhunderts mit einer Einführung in Deutung und Darstellung des Blitzes’; 1990, Frankfurt am M ain, P. Lang.
6.
AshworthW.: ‘Iconography of a new physics’, History and Technology, 1987, 4, 267–297; B. S. Baigrie (ed.): ‘Picturing knowledge: historical and philosophical problems concerning the use of art in science’; 1996, Toronto, Toronto University Press; G. Wiesenfeldt: in ‘Wahrnehmung der Natur – Natur der Wahrnehmung. Studien zur Geschichte visueller Kultur um 1800’, (ed. G. Dürbeck), 103–116; 2001, Dresden, Verlag der Kunst.
7.
StaffordB. M.: ‘Artful science: enlightenment, entertainment, and the eclipse of visual education’; 1994, London, MIT Press.
8.
BredekampH.: ‘Die Erkenntniskraft der Linie bei Galilei, Hobbes und Hooke’, in ‘Re-Visionen‘, (ed. HüttelB., et al.), 145–160; 2002, Berlin, Akademie-Verlag.
9.
HolländerH.(ed.): ‘Erkenntnis, Erfindung, Konstruktion: Studien zur Bildgeschichte von Naturwissenschaften und Technik vom 16. bis zum 19. Jahrhundert’, 2000, Berlin, Gebr. VerlagMann; GalisonP. and JonesC.(ed.): ‘Picturing science, producing art’; 1998, New York, NY, Routledge; U. Seibold-bultmann: ‘Monster soup: the microscope and Victorian fantasy’, ISR, 2000, 25, 211–219.
10.
StückelbergerA.: ‘Bild und Wort. Das illustrierte Fachbuch in der antiken NaturwissenschaftMedizin und Technik’, 13 and 24; 1994, Mainz, Philipp von Zabern.
11.
CasparM.(ed.): ‘Johannes Kepler, harmonicesmundi’, 362; 1979, Munich, Wiss. Buchgesellschaft (first published 1619). We would like to thank Raphael Rosenberg for this reference. In his forthcoming study of the history of abstract art, Rosenberg addresses this passage in considerable detail.
12.
NetzR.: ‘The shaping of deduction in Greek mathematics’; 1999, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press; and ‘On the sphere and cylinder’; forthcoming, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
13.
TybjergK.: ‘Doing philosophy with machines: Hero of Alexandria's rhetoric of mechanics in relation to contemporary philosopy’, PhD thesis, University of Cambridge, UK, 2000, 124.
14.
TopperD.: in ‘Picturing knowledge: historical and philosophical problems concerning the use of art in science’, (ed. BaigrieB. S.), 226; 1996, Toronto, University of Toronto Press.
15.
TopperD.: in ‘Picturing knowledge’, 215 (see Note 14).
16.
ZimmermannJ.: in ‘Die Erfindung der Natur’, 15–24; 1994, Hanover, Rombach.
17.
‘Marcel Broodthaers’, 164; 1991, Paris, Galerie Nationaledu Jeu de Paume.
18.
‘Eine barocke Party. Augenblicke des Welttheaters in der zeitgenossischen Kunst’, 200; 1999, Vienna, Kunsthalle Wien.
19.
ShapinS. and SchafferS.: ‘Leviathan and the airpump. Hobbes, Boyle, and experimental life’, 61; 1985, Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press.
20.
DibnerB.: ‘Alessandro Volta and the electric battery’, 18; 1964, New York, NY, Franklin Watts.
21.
KrifkaS.: in ‘Erkenntnis, Erfindung, Konstruktion: Studien zur Bildgeschichte von Naturwissenschaften und Technik vom 16. bis zum 19. Jahrhundert’, (ed. HöllanderH.), 780–781; 2000, Berlin, Gebr. MannVerlag.
22.
WiesenfeldtG.: ‘Leerer Raum in Minervas Haus. Experimentelle Naturlehre an der Universität Leiden, 1675–1715’, 336–337; 2002, Berlin, Verlag fur Geschichte der Naturwissenschaften und der Technik.
23.
ShapinS. and SchafferS.: ‘Leviathan and the airpump’, 60 (see Note 19).
24.
FraunbergerF.: ‘Elektrizität im Barock’, 29–40; 1964, Cologne, Deubner.
25.
HackmannW. D.: ‘Electricity from glass. The history of the frictional electrical machine, 1600–1850’; 1978, Alphen aan den Rijn, Sijthoff & Noordhoff.
GrayS.: Philosophical Transactions, 1731/2, 37, 18–44and 397–407; J. Heilbron: ‘Electricity in the 17th and 18th centuries: a study of early modern physics’, 247; 1979, Berkeley, CA, University of California Press.
28.
CasatiR.: ‘Die Entdeckung des Schattens. Die faszinierende Karriere einer rätselhaften Erscheinung’, (trans. SchadenB.), 228; 2000, Berlin, BerlinVerlag.
29.
MonsDufay: Philosophical Transactions, 1733/4, 38, 258–266. Anne Williams (a close friend of Samuel Johnson) claims to have been the first to witness the spark accompanying an electric discharge. In a note on the poem ‘On the death of Stephen Grey’, published in ‘Miscellanies in prose and verse’ (1766, London), she wrote: ‘The Publisher of this Miscellany, as she was assisting Mr. Grey in his experiments, was the first that observed and notified the emission of the electrical spark from a human body.’
NolletA.: ‘Essai sur l’électricité des corps’, 142; 1747, Paris, edition Le Haye.
32.
A plate from the 1644 ‘Principia philosophia’ is reproduced inBaigrieB. S.(ed.): ‘Picturing knowledge’, 117 (see Note 6).
33.
NolletA.: ‘Essai sur l’électricité des corps’, 115 (see Note 31).
34.
CraryJ.: ‘Techniques of the observer’, 129; 1990, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press; H. Bredekamp: ‘Die Erkenntniskraft der Linie’, 155–160 (see Note 8).
35.
These plates were executed between 1780 and 1784. The plate to which we specifically refer was completed in 1783.
36.
HeesenA. Te: ‘Der Weltkasten. Die Geschichte einer Bildenzyklopädie aus dem 18. Jahrhundert’, 108–109; 1997, Göttingen, Wallstein.
37.
MeyaJ. and SibumH. O.: ‘Das fünfte Element: Wirkungen und Deutungen der Elektrizität’, 61; 1987, Reinbek, Rowohlt. Electricity became a celebrated motif in fantastical literature: for example, in Saint-Cyr's novel ‘Pauliska, ou la perversité moderne’, children and young women are imprisoned and ‘electrified'in order to rejuvenate an old man (J. A. Révéroni Saint-Cyr: ‘Pauliska, ou la perversité moderne. Mémoires récents d'une Polonaise’, (ed. M. Delon), 189–193; 1991, Paris, Desjonquères (first published 1797)). In one of Edgar Allan Poe's tales, electrical treatment brings an Egyptian mummy back to life (e. A. Poe: ‘Some words with a mummy’, in ‘Tales’; 1845, New York, NY, Wiley and Putnam). Mary Shelley's ‘Frankenstein’ (1818) is the most famous statement on electricity's power to impart vital forces, though strictly speaking the word electricity does not appear in the passage describing the process of giving life to the Homunculus (the exact wording is ‘infuse a spark of being’). For a discussion of this point see J. V. Field and F. James: History Today, September 1994, 47–53; also M. Kemp: ‘Visualizations. The Nature book of art and science’, 82–83; 2000, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
38.
MeyaJ. and SibumH. O.: ‘Das fünfte Element’, 50–51(see Note 37).
39.
Von SeydewitzT.: ‘Ernst Christoph Graf von Manteuffel, Kabinettsminister Augusts des Starken: Persönlichkeit und Wirken’, 145; 1926, Dresden, Buchdr. der Wilhelm und Bertha von Baensch Stiftung.
40.
KlossA.: ‘Von der Electrizität zur Elektriztität’, 35 (see Note 3).
41.
HochadelO.: in ‘Instrument – Experiment’, (ed. MeinelC.), 297; 2000, Berlin, Verlag für Geschichte der Naturwissenschaften und der Technik.
42.
RobertsL.: Isis, 1990, 90, 691.
43.
LichtenbergG. C.: ‘Schriften und Briefe’, (ed. PromiesW.), Vol. 3,24; 1972, Munich, Carl Hanser.
44.
The source of the epigram has not yet been confirmed. The illustration appears inWintermuteA.(ed.): ‘1789: French art during the revolution’, 52; 1989, New York, NY, Colnaghi.
45.
MarmottanP.: ‘Le peintre Louis Boilly’, 35; 1913, Paris, Gateau.
46.
BoerhaaveH.: ‘Elementa chemiae’; 1732, Leyden, Severinus. See also G. A. Lindeboom: ‘Herman Boerhaave: the man and his work’, 325; 1968, London, Methuen and R. C. Home: ‘Nollet and Boerhaave: a note on eighteenth-century ideas about electricity and fire’, Annals of Science, 1979, 36, 173–174.
47.
FraunbergerF.: ‘Elektrizität im Barock’, 131ff(see Note 24).
48.
FranklinB.: ‘Expériences et observations sur l’électricité faites à Philadelphie en Amérique’, (ed. D'AlibardT. F.); 1752, Paris, Durand.
The zigzag line was originally an attribute of Zeus (W. H. Roscher: ‘Ausführliches Lexikon der greichischen und römischen Mythologie’, col. 754–756; 1978, Hildesheim, Olms (first published 1890–94, Leipzig); A. Rieth: ‘Der Blitz in der bildenden Kunst’ (see Note 4)).
51.
NairneE.: Philosophical Transactions, 1774, 64, 79–89, Plate V.
52.
WestBenjamin, ‘Franklin drawing electricity from the sky’ ( 1805–15), oil on carton (Philadelphia Museum of Art); illustrated in H. Holländer (ed.): ‘Erkenntnis, Erfindung, Konstruktion’, Plate 25 (see Note 9).
53.
StaffordB.: ‘Artful science’, 5 (see Note 7); G. Wiesenfeldt: in ‘Wahrnehmung der Natur’, 115 (see Note 6).
54.
VoltaA.: Philosophical Transactions, 1800, 90, 403–431, Plate XVII.
55.
Pinault-SørensenM.: in ‘L'illustration. Essais d'iconographie’, (ed. CraccioloM. T. and LeMaenS.), 220; 1999, Paris, CNRS.
56.
BarthesR.: ‘Les planches de l'encyclopedié de Diderot et d'Alembert vues par Roland Barthes’, (ed. SerriJ.), 29; 1989, Pontoise, Musée de Pontoise.
57.
ArnauldA.: ‘La logique, ou l'art de penser, contenant outre les règles communes, plusieurs observations nouvelles …’, Chap. 1, sec. 4, 282–291; 1972, Darmstadt, WBG(first published 1664, Paris).
58.
StaffordB.: ‘Artful science’, 5 and 16ff (see Note 7).
59.
WiesenfeldtG.: in ‘Wahrnehmung der Natur’, 115–116 (see Note 6).
60.
BrookeJ. H. and CantorG.: ‘Reconstructing nature: the engagement of science and religion’; 1998, Edinburgh, T&T Clark(see in particular the introduction and pp. 148–149 and 161–167).
61.
SymmonsS.: ‘Flaxman and Europe. The outline illustrations and their influence’, 102–103; 1984, New York, NY, Garland.
62.
SpallettiE.: ‘Storia dell'arte italiana. Parte prima. Materiali e probleme’, (ed. BollateG. and FossatiP.), 434and431; 1979, Turin, Einaudi.
63.
Published in London, 1713–88.
64.
For more on this, see S. Schmidt: ‘Von der Ausdruckskraft der Linie: Tischbein, Flaxman und die Ästhetik des Umrißstiches’ (forthcoming). (We extend our warmest thanks to Dr Stefan Schmidt of the University of Augsburg for making his manuscript available to us.)
65.
Pliny: ‘Natural history’, 35, 67.68. Again, for more information, see S. Schmidt: ‘Von der Ausdruckskraft der Linie’ (Note 63).
66.
WinckelmannJ. J.: ‘Geschichte der Kunst des Alterthums’, 112; 1882, Heidelberg, Weiss(first published 1764).
67.
SpallettiE.: ‘Storia dell'arte italiana’, 432 and 434 (see Note 61).
68.
WeissertC.: ‘Reproduktionsstichwerke. Vermittlung alter und neuer Kunst im 18. und frühen 19. Jahrhundert’, 50; 1999, Berlin, Reimer.
69.
KunzeM. and BruerS.-G.(ed.): ‘‘‘Von der Restauration der Antiquen’’ – eine unvollendete Schrift Winckelmanns’, 19; 1996, Mainz, Philipp von Zabern.
70.
JenkinsI. and SloaneK.(ed.): ‘Vases and volcanoes. Sir William Hamilton and his collection’, 59–61; 1996, London, British Museum.
71.
For example, the woodcuts found in Sebastiano Serlio's ‘Regole generali di architettura’ (1566 edition) or in Daniele Barbaro's Vitruvius commentaries from 1556. (Illustrations in H.-W. Kruft: ‘Geschichte der Architekturtheorie. Von der Antike bis zur Gegenwart’, 4th edn, Figs. 36 and 45; 1995, Munich, Beck.)
72.
ColonnaF.: ‘Hypnerotomachia poliphili’, Figs. 23 and 24;1963, London, Engrammia Press(first published 1499, Venice).
