Modelling of Charpy V test rejection probability

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to develop a product design model for estimating the impact toughness of low alloy steel plates. The rejection probability in a Charpy V test is predicted with process variables and chemical composition. Joint modelling of the mean and deviation was used in order to improve the results. The proposed method is suitable for the whole production line, including all grades of steel in production and it is not restricted to a few test temperatures. Using the proposed model the product design group could have recognised most of the rejections before production. Next, the developed model will be implemented into a graphical simulation tool that is in daily use in the product planning department and already contains some other mechanical property models. The model will guide designers in predicting the related risk of rejection and in producing desired properties in the product at lower cost.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Lindroos

V. K.

Sulonen

M. S.

Veistinen

M. V.

: ‘Uudistettu Miekk-ojan metallioppi’; 1986, Helsinki, Otava.

Haušild

: ‘The influence of ductile tearing on fracture energy in the ductile-to-brittle transition temperature range’, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2002, A335, 164–174.

Todinov

: ‘Uncertainty and risk associated with the Charpy impact energy of multi-run welds’, Nucl. Eng. Design, 2004, 231, 27–38.

Bhadeshia

H. K. D. H.

: ‘Neural networks in materials science’, ISIJ Int., 1999, 39, 966–979.

Malinov

Sha

McKeown

: ‘Modelling the correlation between processing parameters and properties in titanium alloys using artificial neural network’, Comput. Mater. Sci., 2001, 21, 375–394.

Golodnikov

: ‘Statistical modelling of composition and processing parameters for alloy development’, Model. Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng., 2005, 13, 633–644.

Engel

: ‘Modelling variation in industrial experiments’, Appl. Statist., 1992, 41, 579–593.

Smyth

G. K.

Huele

A. F.

Verbyla

A. P.

: ‘Exact and approximate REML for heteroscedastic regression’, Statist. Model., 2001, 1, 161–175.

Carroll

R. J.

Ruppert

: ‘Transformation and weighting in regression’; 1988, London, Chapman and Hall.

10.

Tong

L. I.

C. T.

: ‘The optimization of multi-response problems in the Taguchi method’, Int. J. Qual. Reliab. Manag., 1997, 14, 367–380.

11.

Juutilainen

Röning

: ‘Modelling the probability of rejection in a qualification test based on process data’, Proc. 16th Symp. IASC, Prague, Czech, August 2004, IASC, 1271–1278.

12.

Juutilainen

: ‘Modelling of conditional variance and uncertainty using industrial process data’; 2006, Oulu, University of Oulu.

13.

Bishop

C. M.

: ‘Neural networks for pattern recognition’; 1995, Oxford, Oxford University Press, Inc.

14.

Svozil

Kvasnicka

Pospichal

: ‘Introduction to multilayer feed-forward neural networks’, Chemometr. Intell. Lab. Syst., 1997, 39, 43–62.

15.

Harvey

A. C.

: ‘Regression models with multiplicative heteroscedasticity’, Econometrica, 1976, 44, 461–465.

16.

Tamminen

Juutilainen

Röning

: ‘Product design model for impact toughness estimation in steel plate manufacturing’, Proc. Int. Joint Conf. on ‘Neural networks’, Hong Kong, China, June 2008, IEEE, 990–993.

17.

Laurinen

Tuovinen

Röning

: ‘Smart archive: a component-based data mining application framework’, Proc. 5th Int. Conf. on ‘Intelligent systems design and applications’, Wroclaw, Poland, September 2005, ENNS, 20–26.