FaranE and ShiloD: ‘Dynamics of twin boundaries in ferromagnetic shape memory alloys’, Mater. Sci. Technol., 2014, 30, 1545–1558.
4.
HeczkoO: ‘Magnetic shape memory effect and highly mobile twin boundaries’, Mater. Sci. Technol., 2014, 30, 1559–1578.
5.
ZinkM and MayrSG: ‘Ferromagnetic shape memory alloys: synthesis, characterisation and biocompatibility of Fe–Pd for mechanical coupling to cells’, Mater. Sci. Technol., 2014, 30, 1579–1589.
6.
MarkakiAE and JustinAW: ‘A magneto-active scaffold for stimulation of bone growth’, Mater. Sci. Technol., 2014, 30, 1590–1597.
7.
RyderMR and TanJ-C: ‘Nanoporous metal organic framework materials for smart applications’, Mater. Sci. Technol., 2014, 30, 1598–1612.
8.
CrossleyS, WhiterRA and Kar-NarayanS: ‘Polymer based nanopiezoelectric generators for energy harvesting applications’, Mater. Sci. Technol., 2014, 30, 1613–1624.
9.
SreenivasuluG, QuH and SrinivasanG: ‘Multiferroic oxide composites: synthesis, characterisation and applications’, Mater. Sci. Technol., 2014, 30, 1625–1632.
10.
van der ZwaagS, GrandeAM, PostW, GarciaSJ and BorTC: ‘Review of current strategies to induce self-healing behaviour in fibre reinforced polymer based composites’, Mater. Sci. Technol., 2014, 30, 1633–1641.
11.
LauK.-T: ‘Structural health monitoring for smart composites using embedded FBG sensor technology’, Mater. Sci. Technol., 2014, 30, 1642–1654.