FehringR.J.“Efficacy and Efficiency in Natural Family Planning Services,”Linacre Quarterly76 (2009): 9–24.
2.
FehringR.J.“Efficacy and Efficiency in Natural Family Planning Services,”Linacre Quarterly76 (2009):, 14.
3.
HilgersT.W.“The Statistical Evaluation of Natural Methods of Family Planning,”International Review of Natural Family Planning8 (1984): 226–264.
4.
StanfordJ.B.“Measuring Effectiveness and Pregnancy Rates of the CrMS,” in HilgersT.W., The Medical & Surgical Practice of NaProTECHNOLOGY (Omaha, NE: Pope Paul VI Institute Press, 2004), 215–229.
5.
HilgersT.W., and StanfordJ.B.“Creighton Model NaproEducation Technology for Avoiding Pregnancy: Use-Effectiveness,”Journal of Reproductive Medicine43 (1998): 495–502.
6.
HowardM.P., and StanfordJ.B.“Pregnancy Probabilities During Use of the Creighton Model FertilityCare System,”Archives of Family Medicine8 (1999): 391–402.
7.
Fehring, “Efficacy and Efficiency in Natural Family Planning Services,”17.
8.
Fehring, “Efficacy and Efficiency in Natural Family Planning Services,”17.
9.
HilgersT.W., and StanfordJ.B.“Achieving-Related Pregnancy Rate and Its Natural Adaptability,” in Hilgers, The Medical & Surgical Practice of NaProTechnology, 231–240.
10.
HilgersT.W., and PrebilA.M.“The Ovulation Method: Vulvar Observations as an Index of Fertility/Infertility,”Obstetrics and Gynecology53 (1979): 12–22.
11.
Fehring, “Efficacy and Efficiency in Natural Family Planning Services,”21.
12.
CatesW., GrimesD.A., and SmithJ.E.“Abortion as a Treatment for Unwanted Pregnancy: The Number Two Sexually Transmitted ‘Disease,”’ paper presented at the 14th Annual Scientific Meeting of Planned Parenthood Physicians, Miami Beach, FL, November 11, 1976.
13.
RedmondG.“Use of Placebo Controls in an Oral Contraceptive Trial: Methodological Issues in Adverse Event Incidents,”Contraception60 (1999): 81–85; J. Dayal and K.T. Barnhart, “Non-Contraceptive Benefits and Therapeutic Uses of the Oral Contraceptive Pill,” Seminars in Reproductive Medicine 19 (2001): 295-303.
14.
Hilgers, “The Statistical Evaluation of Natural Methods of Family Planning”; Stanford, “Measuring Effectiveness and Pregnancy Rates of the CrMS”; Hilgers and Stanford, “Achieving-Related Pregnancy Rate and Its Natural Adaptability”; Hilgers and Stanford, “Creighton Model NaproEducation.”
15.
WadeM.E.“A Randomized Prospective Study of the Use Effectiveness of Two Methods of Natural Family Planning,”American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology141 (1981): 368–376.
16.
HilgersThe Medical & Surgical Practice of NaProTECHNOLOGY.
17.
SnickH.K.A.“Should Spontaneous or Timed Intercourse Guide Couples Trying to Conceive?”Human Reproduction20 (2005): 2976–2969; H.K. Snick, J.A. Collins, and J.L.H. Evers, “What Is the Most Valid Comparison Treatment in Trials of Intrauterine Insemination, Times or Uninfluenced Intercourse? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Indirect Evidence,” Human Reproduction 23 (2008): 2239-2245.
18.
The Society for Reproductive Medicine, “Optimizing Natural Fertility,”Fertility and Sterility90 supp. 3 (2008): S1–S6.
19.
StanfordJ.B.“Measuring Effectiveness and Pregnancy Rates of the CrMS,” in HilgersT.W., The Medical & Surgical Practice of NaProTECHNOLOGY (Omaha, NE: Pope PaulVI Institue Press, 2004), 215-229.
20.
HowardM.P., and StanfordJ.B.“Pregnancy Probabilities During Use of the Creighton Model Fertility Care System,”Archive of Family Medicine8 (1999): 391–402.
21.
TrussellJ.“Contraceptive Failure in the United States,”Contraception70 (2004): 89–96.
22.
ArevaloM., JenningsV., and SinaiI.“Efficacy of a New Method of Family Planning: The Standard Days Method,”Contraception65 (2002): 333–338; M. Arevalo, et al., “Efficacy of the New TwoDay Method of Family Planning,” Fertility and Sterility 82 (2004): 885-892; P. Frank-Herrmann, et al., „Determination of the Fertile Window: Reproductive Competence of Women: European Cycle Databases,” Gynecology and Endocrinology 20 (2005): 305-312; P. Frank-Herrmann, et al., “The Effectiveness of a Fertility Awareness Based Method to Avoid Pregnancy in Relation to a Couple's Sexual Behavior During the Fertile Time: A Prospective Longitudinal Study,” Human Reproduction 22 (2007): 1310-1319; R.J. Fehring, et al., „Efficacy of Cervical Mucus Observations plus Electronic Hormonal Fertility Monitoring as a Method of Natural Family Planning,” Journal of Obstetric Gynecologic and Neonatal Nursing 36 (2007): 152-160; R.J. Fehring, M. Schneider, and M.L. Barron, “Efficacy of the Marquette Method of Natural Family Planning,” MCN The American Journal of Maternal Child Nursing 33 (2008): 348-354; R.J. Fehring, et al., “Cohort Comparison of Two Fertility Awareness Methods of Family Planning,” Journal of Reproductive Medicine (2009): in press.
23.
GuidaM.“Efficacy of Methods for Determining Ovulation in a Natural Family Planning Program,”Fertility and Sterility72 (1999): 900–904; R.J. Fehring, K. Raviele, and M. Schneider, “A Comparison of the Fertile Phase of as Determined by the Clearplan Easy Fertility Monitor and Self-Assessment of Cervical Mucus,” Contraception 69 (2004): 9-14; F. Bassi, A. Mion, and B. Colombo, “Interobserver Variation in Interpretation of Cervical Mucus as an Indicator of the Fertile Phase in a Menstrual Cycle,” Genus 53 (2003): 91-102.
24.
HilgersT.W., AbrohamG.E., and CavanaghD.“Natural Family Planning. I. The Peak Symptom and Estimated Time of Ovulation,”Obstetrics and Gynecology52 (1978): 575–582.
25.
HelmerhorstF.M.“The Cochrane Fertility Regulation Group: Synthesizing the Best Evidence about Family Planning,”Contraception74 (2006): 280–286.
26.
Helmerhorst The Cochrane Fertility Regulation Group”; D.A. Grimes, et al., “Fertility Awareness-Based Methods for Contraception: Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials,”Contraception72 (2005): 85–90.
27.
KambicR.T., and LamprechtV.“Calendar Rhythm Efficacy: A Review,”Advancements in Contraception12 (1996): 123–128.
