To improve the utilisation of timber in building construction and enhance the market value of Ugandan timber species, especially the lesser known, strength properties of 17 species were studied. Small clear specimen tests were conducted in bending, compression and shear parallel to grain using the standard procedures of the American Society for Testing and Materials, ISO 8905:1988, AS/NZS 2878:2000 and BS 373:1957. Results showed significant differences in strength properties of the investigated timbers. A positive relationship was found between bending strength and stiffness. It was recommended that the timbers be grouped on the basis of the variability in their strength properties.
ASTM. 1999. Annual book of standards.Vol. 04.10. Wood. West Conshohocken, PA, USA: ASTM.
2.
ASTM. 2000. Standard test methods for small clear specimens of timber.ASTM D 143–94. West Conshohocken, PA, USA: ASTM.
3.
BowyerJ. L., ShmulskyR. and HaygreenJ. G. 2003. Forest products and wood science: an introduction.4th edition. Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press.
4.
British Standards Institution. 1957. Method of testing small clear specimens of timber.BS 373:1957. Milton Keynes, UK: British Standards Institution.
5.
British Standards Institution. 1996. Structural use of timber. Grade stresses and moduli of elasticity for various strength classes for service classes 1 and 2.BS 5268–2:1996. Milton Keynes, UK: British Standards Institution.
6.
DinwoodieJ. M. 1981. Timber: its structure, nature and behaviour. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold Company.
7.
DivosF. and TanakaT. 2005. Relation between static and dynamic modulus of elasticity of wood. Acta Silv. Lign. Hung. 1: 105–110.
8.
DunhamR. A., CameronA. D. and PettyJ. A. 1999. The effect of growth rate on the strength properties of sawn beams of silver birch (Betula pendula Roth). Scand.J. Forest Res.14(1): 18–26(9).
9.
GreenW. D. and ShelleyB. E. 2006. Guidelines for assigning allowable properties to mechanically graded lumber from foreign species. Madison, WI: USDA Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory.
10.
HansenL. W., KnowlesR. L. and WalfordG. B. 2004. Residual within tree variation in stiffness of small clear specimens from Pinus Radiata and Pseudotsuga Menziesii.N. Z. J. For. Sci.34(2): 206–216.
11.
IshengomaR. C. and GillahP. R. 1992. Comparison of basic density, strength properties and fibre length of juvenile and mature wood of Pinus patula, grown in Meru forest plantation, Arusha.Faculty of Forestry, Sokoine University of Agriculture, Morogoro, Tanzania. Record no. 55. Page 15.
12.
IshengomaR. C. and NagodaL. 1991. Solid wood: physical and mechanical properties, defects, grading and utilisation as fuel. Teaching compendium. Sokoine University of Agriculture, Morogoro, Tanzania.
13.
ISO. 1975a. Wood - determination of moisture content for physical and mechanical tests.ISO 3130:1975. Geneva, Switzerland: ISO.
14.
ISO. 1975b. Wood - determination of ultimate strength in static bending.ISO 3133:1975. Geneva, Switzerland: ISO.
15.
ISO. 1988. Sawn timber - test methods - determination of ultimate strength in shearing parallel to grain.ISO 8905:1988. Geneva, Switzerland: ISO.
16.
KligerR. 2000. Mechanical properties of timber products required by end users.Proc. World Conf. on Timber Engineering, Whilstler, Canada, July-August 2000. University of British Columbia.
17.
KretschmannD. E. and GreenD. W. 1999. Mechanical grading of oak timbers.J. Mater. Civ. Eng.11(2): 91–97.
18.
LaversG. M. 1993. The strength properties of timbers.3rd edition, revised byMooreG. L.. Building Research Report. Watford: Stationery Office Books.
19.
LeicesterR. H. 2002. Future directions of timber engineering research.N. Z. Timber Des. J.4(11): 7–16.
20.
MahongeC. P. I. 2007. Basic density and strength properties variations in Cordia Africana (Lam) grown under Agroforestry in Arumeru, Tanzania. Int.J. Ecol. Econ. Stat. 8(S07): 75–84.
21.
MeadR., CurnowN. R. and HastedA. M.2003. Statistical methods in agriculture and experimental biology.3rd edition. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall.
22.
MettemC. J. 1986. Structural timber design and technology. Harlow: Longman Scientific & Technical.
23.
PiazzaM. and RiggioM. 2008. Visual strength-grading and NDT of timber in traditional structures. J. Build. Apprais. 3: 267–296.
SternR. D., CoeR., AllanE. F. and DaleI. C. 2004. Good statistical practice for natural resources research. Wallingford: CAB International.
26.
TeofistoC. and SaraldeJr. 2003. Experimental design and testing program to establish machine stress grades.Proc. Int. Workshop on the Development and implementation of lumber stress grading rules for tropical timber: the Philippine experience. Pasig City, Philippines, November 2003. ITTO.
27.
TindiwensiD. 2006. An investigation of the Uganda construction industry. PhD thesis. Faculty of Technology, Makerere University, Uganda.
28.
TsehayeA, BuchananA. H. and WalkerJ. C. F.2000. Sorting of logs using acoustics.J. Wood Sci. Technol.34: 337–344.
29.
TsehayeA., BuchnanA. H. and WalkerJ. C. F.1995. A comparison of density and stiffness for predicting wood quality or density: the lazy man's guide to wood quality.J. Inst. Wood Sci.13(6): 539–543.
30.
WalkerJ. C. F. and ButterfieldB. G.1996. The importance of the microfibril angle for the processing industries.N. Z. For. 40(4): 34–40.
31.
ZziwaA., BukenyaM., SserembaO. E. and KyeyuneR. K. 2006a. Non-traditional tree species used in the furniture industry in Masaka district, central Uganda.Uganda J. Agric. Sci. 12(1): 29–37.
32.
ZziwaA., KaboggozaJ. R. S., MwakaliJ. A., BananaA. Y. and KyeyuneR. K.2006b. Physical and mechanical properties of some less utilised tropical timber tree species growing in Uganda.Uganda J. Agric. Sci. 12(1): 57–66.
33.
ZziwaA., ZirabaY. N. and MwakaliJ. A. 2009. Timber use practices in Uganda's building construction industry: current situation and future prospects. J. Inst. Wood Sci. 19: 48–53.
