To derive a rapid procedure for estimating the natural durability of timbers, an accelerated laboratory procedure for testing the resistance of nine timbers to termite infestation was initiated. Wood specimens of nine Malaysian timber species were used in termite bioassay based on no-choice test using the subterranean termite Coptotermes gestroi Wasman. It was found that mass losses of all timber species were in the range of 0.54% to 8.82% after four weeks exposure to the test termite. Termite mortality levels and trends over the first three weeks of testing suggested that the extractive compounds of wood might act as natural toxicants that gradually but steadily increased the mortality rate of C. gestroi.
AbreuR.L.S., and SilvaK. E. S. 2000. Resistencia natural de dez especies madereiras da Amazonia ao ataque de Nasutitermes macrocephalus (Silvestre) e N. surinamen-sis (Holmgren) (Isoptera: Termitidae). Revista Arvore24: 229–234.
2.
ASTM (American Society for Testing and Materials). 1988. Standard test method of laboratory evaluation of wood and other cellulosic materials for resistance to termites. In ASTM Annual Book of StandardsVol. 4.10 Wood. American Society for Testing and Materials. West Conshohocken, PA, pp. 430–432.
3.
BehrE. A, BehrC. T. and WilsonL. F. 1972. Influence of wood hardness on feeding by the eastern subterranean termite,Reticulitermesflavipes(Isoptera:Rhinotermitidae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America65: 457–460.
4.
BultmanJ. D. and SouthwellC. R. 1976. Natural resistance of tropical American woods to terrestrial wood-destroying organisms. Biotropica8 (2): 71–95.
5.
BultmanJ. D. and ParrishK.K. 1979. Evaluation of some wood extractives and related compounds as anti-borer, anti-fungal and anti-termitic agents. International Biodeterioration Bulletin15(1): 19–27.
6.
BultmanJ. D., BealR. H. and AmpongF. F. K. 1979. Natural resistance of some tropical African woods to Coptotermes formosanus Shiraki. Forest Products Journal29(6): 46–51.
7.
CarterF. L. 1976. Responses of subterranean termites to wood extractives. Material und Organismen11: 357–364.
8.
CoulsonR. N. and LundA. E. 1973. Degradation of wood by insects. Wood deterioration and its prevention. New York: Syracuse University Press. 305 pp.
9.
DelateK. M. and GraceJ. K.. 1995. Susceptibility of neem to attack by the Formosan subterranean termite, Coptotermes forrnosanusShiraki (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae). Journal of Applied Entomology119: 93–95.
10.
GanapatyS., ThomasP. S.FotsoS. and LaatschH. 2004. Antitermitic quinones from Diospyros sylvatica. Phytochemistry65: 1265–1271.
11.
GraceJ. K. 2003. Approaches to biological control of termites. Sociobiology41(1A and B): 115–120.
12.
GraceJ. K. and YamamotoR. T. 1993. Sequential exposure of borate treated Douglas-fir to multiple Formosan subterranean termite colonies in a 40-week field test. 24th Int. Res. Grp on Wood Pres.Annual Meeting, Orlando, USA, Doc. No. IRG/WP/93-10006. 6 pp.
13.
GraceJ. K. and YamamotoR. T. 1994. Natural resistance of Alaska-cedar, redwood and teak to Formosan subterranean termites. Forest Products Journal44(3): 41–45.
14.
GraceJ. K., YatesJ. R.III, TomeC. H. M. and OshiroR. J.. 1996. Termite resistant construction: use of a stainless steel mesh to excludeCoptotermes formosanus (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae). Sociobiology28: 365–372.
15.
GraceJ. K., WongA. H. H. and TomeC. H. M.1998. Termite resistance of Malaysian and exotic woods with plantation potential: Laboratory evaluation. IRG Document, IRG/WP98–10280,7 pp.
16.
HonD. N. S. and ShiraishiN.1991. Wood and cellulosic chemistry. 1020 p. ISBN 0-8247-8304–2.
17.
JurdL., StevenK. and MannersG. 1972. Quinonoid constituents of Dalbergia retusa heartwood. Phytochemistry11: 3287–3292.
18.
KennedyM.J., DixonL. L. and PetersB. C. 1994. Susceptibility of heartwood of three species to attack by the subterranean termiteCoptotermes acinaciformis(Froggatt). IRG Document, IRG/WP94–20026.10 pp.
19.
KirtonL. G. and BrownV. K. 2003. The taxonomic status of pest species of Coptotermes in Southeast Asia: resolving the paradox in the pest status of the termites, Coptotermes gestroi, C. havillandi and C. travians (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae). Sociobiology42: 43–63.
20.
KirtonL. G., BrownV. K. and AzmiM. 1998. A new method of trapping subterranean termites of the genus Coptotermes (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae) for field and laboratory studies. Sociobiology32: 451–458.
21.
PeraltaR. C.MenezesG., CarvalhoE. B. A. G. and MenezesE. L. A.2004. Wood consumption rates of forest species by subterranean termites (Isoptera) under field conditions. Rev. Arvore. 28(2): 283–289.
22.
SandermannW., DietrichsH. H., GottwaldH. 1958. Untersuchungen frühgeschichtlicher Holzer und deren Bedeutung fur den Holzschutz. Holz als Roh-und Werkstoff16: 197–203.
23.
SchaeferD. A. and WhitfordW. G. 1981. Nutrient cycling by subterranean termite Gnathamitermes tubiformans in a Chihuahuan Desert ecosystem. Oecologia No. 48: 277–283.
24.
ScheffrahnR. H. 1991. Allelochemical resistance of wood to termites. Sociobiology19: 257–281.
25.
SchultzT. P. and NicholasD. O. 2002. Development of environmentally benign wood preservative based on the combination of organic biocides with anti-oxidants and metal chelators. Phytochemistry61: 555–560.
26.
SuN-Y, and ScheffrahnR. H. 1998. A review of subterranean termite control practices and prospects for integrated pest management programs. Integrated Pest Management Reviews3: 1–13.
27.
WolcottG. N. 1947. Permanence of termite repellents. Journal of Economic Entomology40: 124–129.
