In a recent article in Sociology, Joe Bailey maps out some important recent developments in sociological theorising, which he represents as `the private'. In this he seeks to use `the private' for one particular sociological purpose, but may be in danger of obscuring other purposes that may also be important. In his discussions he largely neglects the considerable body of feminist literature around public and private, drawing very heavily instead on recent writings by some prominent male sociological theorists. Most significantly, he subsumes family life within his category of intimacy, but this may obliterate some ideas about `families'. Furthermore, parent-child relationships are about a great deal more than intimacy, not least because there are real issues of power involved. Our own concerns with the concepts of public and private have been to illuminate different ways of being that are associated with different sorts of social spaces. We outline four main tensions that may become overlaid to create extensive differences in ways of being, including a tension around differing understandings of the individual. In particular, we point out the significance of childhood and children in these tensions around public and private social spaces, and their associated practices and orientations.
Bailey, Joe2000. `Some meanings of “the Private” in Sociological Thought'. Sociology34:381-401.
2.
Bailey, Lucy1999. `Refracted Selves? A Study of Changes in Self-Identity in the Transition to Motherhood'. Sociology33:335-372.
3.
Beck, Ulrich , and Beck-Gernsheim, Elisabeth 1995. The Normal Chaos of Love (trans. Mark Ritter and Jane Wiebel). Cambridge: Polity Press.
4.
Belenky, Mary F. , Clinchy, Blythe M., Goldberger, Nancy R. and Tarule, Jill M., 1986. Women's Ways of Knowing: The Development of Self, Voice and Mind. New York: Basic Books.
5.
Bell, Linda , and Ribbens, Jane1994. `Isolated Housewives and Complex Maternal Worlds: The Significance of Social Contacts between Women with Young Children in Industrial Societies'. Sociological Review42:227-262.
6.
Bellah Robertet al. 1985. Habits of the Heart: Individualism and Commitment in American Family Life. Berkeley, University of California Press.
7.
Benhabib, S. 1992. Situating the Self: Gender, Community and Postmodernism in Contemporary Ethics. New York: Routledge.
8.
Benn, S.L. and Gaus, J.F. (eds.) 1983. Public and Private in Social Life. London: Croom Helm.
9.
Brannen, Julia , Heptinstall, E. and Bhopal, K. 2000. Connecting Children: Care and Family Life in Later Childhood. London: Routledge.
10.
Chamberlayne, Prue 1998. `Cultural Analysis of the Informal Sphere'. Paper presented to the International Sociological Association Conference, Montreal.
11.
Cheal, David 1991. Family and the State of Theory. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
12.
Chodorow, Nancy 1978. The Reproduction of Mothering: Psychoanalysis and the Sociology of Gender. Berkeley: University of California Press.
13.
Davidoff, Leonore 1995. Worlds Between: Historical Perspectives on Gender and Class. Cambridge: Polity Press.
14.
Davies, Karen 1990. Women, Time and the Weaving of the Strands of Everyday Life. Aldershot: Gower.
15.
DeVault, Marjorie1990. `Talking and Listening from Women's Standpoint: Feminist Strategies for Interviewing and Analysis'. Social Problems37:96-116.
16.
Doucet, Andrea2000. ` “There's a Huge Difference Between Me as a Male Carer and Women”: Gender, Domestic Responsibility and the Community as an Institutional Arena'. Community, Work and Family3:163-184.
17.
Dumont, Louis 1972. Homo Hierarchicus. London: Granada.
18.
Edwards, Rosalind 1993. Mature Women Students: Separating or Connecting Family and Education. London: Taylor and Francis.
19.
Edwards, Rosalind and Ribbens, Jane 1998. `Living on the Edges: Public Knowledge, Private Lives and Personal Experience', in Jane Ribbens and Rosalind Edwards (eds.), Feminist Dilemmas in Qualitative Research: Public Knowledge and Private Lives. London: Sage.
20.
Eisenstein, H. 1984. Contemporary Feminist Thought. London: Unwin.
21.
Elshtain, J. 1981. Public Man, Private Woman. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
22.
Fahey, T.1995. `Privacy and the Family: Conceptual and Empirical Reflections'. Sociology29:687-702.
23.
Ferree, Myra Marx1985. `Between Two Worlds: German Feminist Approaches to Working Class Women and Work'. Signs10.
24.
Flax, Jane1978. `The Conflict between Nurturance and Autonomy in Mother-Daughter Relationships and within Feminism'. Feminist Studies4:171-189.
25.
Fraser, N. 1997. Justice Interruptus: Rethinking Key Concepts in a Postsocialist Age. New York: Routledge.
26.
Gamarnikow, E. , Morgan, D., Purvis, J. and Taylorson, D. (eds.) 1983. The Public and the Private. London: Heinemann.
27.
Giddens, Anthony 1992. The Transformation of Intimacy: Sexuality, Love and Eroticism in Modern Societies. Cambridge: Polity Press.
28.
Gillies, Val , Ribbens McCarthy, Jane and Holland, Janet 2001. `Pulling Together, Pulling Apart': The Family Lives of Young People. London: Joseph Rowntree Foundation/Family Policy Studies Centre.
29.
Gilligan, Carol 1982. In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's Development. London: Harvard University Press.
30.
Gilligan, Carol 1988. `Remapping the Moral Domain: New Images of Self in Relationship', in Carol Gilligan, Janie Victoria Ward and Jill McLean Taylor with Betty Bardige (eds.), Mapping the Moral Domain: A Contribution to Women's Thinking in Psychological Theory and Education. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
31.
Hendry, Joy 1992. `Individualism and Individuality: Entry into a Social World', in Roger Goodman and Kirsten Refsing (eds.), Ideology and Practice in Modern Japan. New York: Routledge.
32.
Jamieson, Lynn 1998. Intimacy: Personal Relationships in Modern Societies. Cambridge: Polity Press.
33.
Landes, J.B. 1998. `Introduction', in Joan Landes (ed.), Feminism: The Public and The Private. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
34.
Lukes, Steven 1985. `Conclusion', in Michael Carrithers, Steven Collins and Steven Lukes (eds.), The Category of the Person: Anthropology, Philosophy, History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
35.
Mayall, Berry and Foster, Marie-Claude 1989. Child Health Care: Living with Children, Working for Children. Oxford: Heinemann.
36.
Pateman, Carol 1970. Participation and Democratic Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
37.
Ribbens, Jane 1990. `Accounting for Our Children: Differing Perspectives on “Family” Life in Middle Income Households'. Doctoral dissertation. London, CNAA/South Bank Polytechnic.
38.
Ribbens, Jane 1994. Mothers and Their Children: A Feminist Sociology of Childrearing. London: Sage.
39.
Ribbens, Jane and Edwards, Rosalind1995. `Introducing Qualitative Research on Women in Families and Households'. Women's Studies International Forum18:3, 247-258.
40.
Ribbens McCarthy, Jane and Edwards, Rosalind 1999a. `Gendered Lives, Gendered Concepts?: The Significance of Children for Theorising “Public” and “Private” '. Paper presented to the BSA Annual Conference, Glasgow.
41.
Ribbens McCarthy, Jane and Edwards, Rosalind 1999b. `Individuality and Connectedness in the Lives of Mothers and Children: Maintaining a Perspective on Public and Private', in Theoretical Perspectives on Working and Mothering, Report of the 2nd TSER Seminar of the Thematic Network, Working and Mothering: Social Practices and Social Policies, Frankfurt.
42.
Ribbens McCarthy, Jane and Edwards, Rosalind 2001. `The Individual in “Public” and “Private”: The Significance of Mothers and Children, in Alan Carlinget al. (eds.), Analysing Families: Morality and Rationality in Policy and Practice. London: Routledge.
43.
Rosaldo, M. and Lamphere, L. (eds.) 1974. Women, Culture and Society. Stanford, Calif.: University of Stanford Press.
44.
Ruddick, Sara 1989. Maternal Thinking: Towards a Politics of Peace. London: The Women's Press.
45.
Sassoon, A.S. (ed.) 1987. Women and the State: The Shifting Boundaries of Public and Private. London: Hutchinson.
46.
Schutz, Alfred1954. `Concept and Theory Formation in the Social Sciences'. Journal of Philosophy51:257-273.
47.
Sevenhuijsen, Selma 1988. Citizenship and the Ethics of Care: Feminist Considerations on Justice, Morality and Politics. London: Routledge.
48.
Sharistanian, J. (ed.) 1987. Beyond the Public/Domestic Dichotomy: Contemporary Perspectives on Women's Public Lives. Westport: Greenwood Press.
49.
Slater, Don 1998. `Public/Private', in Chris Jenks (ed.), Core Sociological Dichotomies. London: Sage.
50.
Smith, Dorothy E. 1987. The Everyday World as Problematic: A Feminist Sociology. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
51.
Stacey Margaret 1981. `The Division of Labour Revisited, or Overcoming the Two Adams', in Philip Abrams, Rosemary Deem, Janet Finch and Paul Rock (eds.), Practice and Progress: British Sociology 1950-1980. London: George Allen and Unwin.
52.
Stacey, Judith 1998. Transatlantic Traffic in the Politics of Family Values. Paper presented to the Centre for Family and Household Research, Oxford Brookes University.
53.
Triandis, H.C. 1987. `Individualism and Social Psychological Theory', in C.Kagitcibasi (ed.), Growth and Progress in Cross-Cultural Psychology. London: Taylor and Francis.
54.
Tronto, Joan 1993. Moral Boundaries: A Political Argument for an Ethic of Care. New York: Routledge.
Weintraub, Jeff 1997. `The Theory and Politics of the Public/Private Distinction', in Jeff Weintraub and Krishan Kumar (eds.), Public and Private in Thought and Practice: Perspectives on a Grand Dichotomy. Chicago: University of Chicago.
57.
Weintraub, Jeff and Kumar, Krishan (eds.) 1997. Public and Private in Thought and Practice: Perspectives on a Grand Dichotomy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
