This paper presents a sociological investigation of instances of a class of claimed paranormal phenomena: the apparent demonstration of paranormal means of cognition by psychic practitioners, such as mediums, psychics, clairvoyants and tarot-card readers. Using a conversation analytic perspective, this paper examines recordings and transcripts of sittings between psychics and members of the public. It describes a linguistic sequence through which (unattributed) information is offered by the psychic, accepted by the sitter and then established as coming from a paranormal source. This form of analysis is located within an emerging social scientific interest to explore ostensibly anomalous human experiences to enrich understanding of everyday behaviour. In this case, it is argued that analysis of the socially organised properties of exchanges in which apparently successful demonstrations of paranormal cognitive abilities are accomplished can contribute to broader debates about the relationship between discourse and cognition.
Antaki, C. and Widdicombe, S. (eds.) 1998. Identities in Talk. London: Sage.
2.
Atkinson, J. M. and Heritage, J. (eds.) 1984. Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3.
Bartholomew, R. E. and Howard, G. S. 1998. UFOs and Alien Contact. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books.
4.
Blackmore, S. J.1984. `A Psychological Theory of the OBE'. Journal of Parapsychology48:201-218.
5.
Bourque, L B. and Back, K. W.1968. `Values and Transcendental Experiences'. Social Forces47:34-38.
6.
Braud, W. and Anderson, R. 1998. Transpersonal Research Methods for the Social Sciences. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage.
7.
Byrne, J. and Sutton, J. 1993. The Psychic World of James Byrne. London: The Aquarian Press.
8.
Collins, H. M. and Pinch, T. J. 1979. `The Construction of the Paranormal: Nothing Unscientific is Happening', pp. 237-270 in R. Wallis (ed.), On the Margins of Science: The Social Construction of Rejected Knowledge. University of Keele, Sociological Review Monograph no. 27.
9.
Drew, P. 1989. `Recalling Someone from the Past', pp. 96-115 in D. Roger and P. Bull (eds.), Conversation: An Interdisciplinary Perspective. Clevedon and Philadelphia: Multilingual Matters.
10.
Drew, P. and Heritage, J. 1992. Talk At Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11.
Edwards, D. 1997. Discourse and Cognition. London. Sage.
12.
Edwards, D. and Potter, J. 1992. Discursive Psychology. London: Sage.
13.
Emmons, C. F. and Sobal, J.1981. `Paranormal Beliefs: Testing the Marginality Hypothesis'. Sociological Focus14:49-56.
14.
Evans, H. 1982. Intrusions: Society and the Paranormal. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
15.
Fox, J. W.1992. `The Structure, Stability and Social Antecedents of Reported Paranormal Experiences'. Sociological Analysis53:417-431.
16.
Hartman, P.1976. `Social Dimensions of Occult Participation: The `Gnostica' Study'. British Journal of Sociology27:169-183.
17.
Have, P. ten 1999. Doing Conversation Analysis: A Practical Guide. London: Sage.
18.
Hay, D. and Morisy, A.1978. `Reports of Ecstatic Paranormal, or Religious Experience in Great Britain and the United States - A Comparison of Trends'. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion17:255-268.
19.
Heath, C. 1992. `The Delivery and Reception of Diagnosis in General-Practice Consultation', pp. 235-267 in P. Drew and J. Heritage (eds.), Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
20.
Holt, E.1996. `Reporting on Talk: The Use of Direct Reported Speech in Conversation'. Research on Language and Social Interaction29:219-245.
21.
Hutchby, I. and Wooffitt, R. 1998. Conversation Analysis: Principles, Practices and Applications. Oxford: Polity Press.
22.
Hyman, R. 1981. ` “Cold Reading”: How to Convince Strangers that You Know All about Them', pp. 79-96 in K. Frazier (ed.), Paranormal Borderlands of Science. New York: Prometheus Books.
23.
Irwin, H. J.1991. `Reasoning Skills of Paranormal Believers'. Journal of Parapsychology55:281-300.
24.
James, W. 1979. The Will to Believe. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
25.
Jefferson, G. 1983. `Notes on Some Orderlinesses of Overlap Onset.'Tilburg Papers in Language and Literature No. 28. Department of Linguistics, Tilburg University.
26.
McClenon, J.1990. `Chinese and American Anomalous Experiences: The Role of Religiosity'. Sociological Analysis51:53-67.
27.
Moody, E. J. 1974. `Urban witches', pp. 223-234 in E. A. Tiryakin (ed.), On the Margins of the Visible. New York: John Wiley.
28.
O'Brien, S. 1992. In Touch With Eternity: Contact With Another World. London: Bantam Books.
29.
Persinger, M. A.1983. `Geophysical Variables and Behavior: IX. Expected Clinical Consequences of Close Proximity to UFO-related Luminosities'. Perceptual and Motor Skills56:259-265.
30.
Persinger, M. A. and Makarec, K.1987. `Temporal Lobe Signs and Correlative Behaviours Displayed by Normal Populations'. Journal of General Psychology114:179-195.
31.
Pomerantz, A.1986. `Extreme Case Formulations'. Human Studies9:219-230.
32.
Potter, J. 1996. Representing Reality: Discourse, Rhetoric and Social Construction. London: Sage.
33.
Rao, K. R. and Palmer, J.1987. `The Anomaly Called Psi: Recent Research and Criticism'. Behavioural and Brain Sciences10:539-551.
34.
Rossi, E. L. 1986. The Psychobiology of Mind-Body Healing. New York: Norton.
35.
Sacks, H. , Schegloff, E. A. and Jefferson, G.1974. `A Simplest Systematics for the Organisation of Turn-taking for Conversation'. Language50:696-735.
36.
Schwartz R. A. 1981. `Sleight of Tongue', pp. 97-105 in K. Frazier (ed.), Paranormal Borderlands of Science. New York: Prometheus Books.
37.
Shine, B. 1996. My Life as a Medium. London: Thorsons.
38.
Smith, D.1978. ` “K” is Mentally Ill: The Anatomy of a Factual Account'. Sociology12:23-53.
39.
Spiritualists National Union website. 1999 http://www.snu.org.uk/index2.htm
40.
Truzzi, M.1971. `The Occult Revival in Popular Culture: Some Random Observations on the Old and the Nouveau Witch'. Sociological Quarterly13:16-36.
41.
Truzzi, M. 1974a. `Definition and Dimension of the Occult: Toward a Sociological Perspective', pp. 243-256 in E. A. Tiryakin (ed.), On the Margins of the Visible. New York: Wiley.
42.
Truzzi, M , 1974b. `Witchcraft and Satanism', pp. 215-222 in E. A. Tiryakin (ed.), On the Margin of the Visible. New York: Wiley.
43.
Warren, D. I.1970. `Status Inconsistency Theory and Flying Saucer Sightings'. Science170:599-603.
44.
Westrum, R.1977. `Social Intelligence About Anomalies: The Case of UFOs'. Social Studies of Science7:271-302.
45.
Widdicome, S. and Wooffitt, R. 1995. The Language of Youth Subcultures: Social Identity in Action. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester.
46.
Wooffitt. R. 1989. `(Telling) Tales of the Unexpected: A Sociological Analysis of Accounts of Paranormal Experiences'. Doctoral dissertation, University of York.
47.
Wooffitt, R. 1992. Telling Tales of the Unexpected: Accounts of Paranormal Experiences. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester.
48.
Wuthnow, R.1976. `Astrology and Marginality'. Journal of the Scientific Study of Religion15:157-168.
49.
Young, D. E. and Goulet, J-G. 1994. Being Changed by Cross-Cultural Encounters: The Anthropology of Extraordinary Experience. Peterborough, Ontario: Broadview Press.
50.
Zimmer, T. A.1984. `Social Psychological Correlates of Possible UFO Sightings'. Journal of Social Psychology123:199-206.
