The authors review recent conceptual and empirical research on temporary organizations in marketing. In particular, they review a series of articles that have examined temporary organizations using the theoretical lens of transaction cost economics and interfirm governance. Based on this research, they propose a conceptual framework for analyzing the governance mechanisms that are available to temporary organizations. The framework categorizes governance mechanisms on the basis of their content (formal vs. informal), and their underlying logic (design vs. activation). The article identifies future research questions and highlights methodological challenges and opportunities for research on temporary organizations.
AchrolR. (1991). Evolution of the marketing organization: New forms for turbulent environments. Journal of Marketing, 55(4), 77–93.
2.
AchrolR. S. (1997). Changes in the theory of interorganizational relations in marketing—Toward a network paradigm. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 25(1), 56–71.
3.
AdamiV. S.VerschooreJ. R. (2018). Implications of network relations for the governance of complex projects. Project Management Journal, 49(2), 71–88.
4.
AppioF. P.LacosteS. (2019). B2B relationship management in Complex Product Systems (CoPS). Industrial Marketing Management, 79, 53–57.
BechkyB. A. (2006). Gaffers, gofers, and grips: Role-based coordination in temporary organizations. Organization Science, 17(1), 3–21.
7.
BellS. J.TraceyP.HeideJ. B. (2009). The organization of regional clusters. Academy of Management Review, 34(4), 623–642.
8.
BrunetM.FachinF.LangleyA. (2021). Studying projects processually. International Journal of Project Management, 39(8), 834–848.
9.
BurkeC. M.MorleyM. J. (2016). On temporary organizations: A review, synthesis and research agenda. Human Relations, 69(6), 1235–1258.
10.
ChatmanJ. A. (1991). Matching people and organizations: Selection and socialization in public accounting firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36(3), 459–484.
11.
ChenJ.TaylorJ. E. (2014). Modeling retention loss in project networks: Untangling the combined effect of skill decay and turnover on learning. Journal of Management in Engineering, 30(5), 1–10.
DingM.EliashbergJ. (2002). Structuring the new product development pipeline. Management Science, 48(3), 343–363.
16.
DvirD.RazT.ShenharA. J. (2003). An empirical analysis of the relationship between project planning and project success. International Journal of Project Management, 21(2), 89–95.
EcclesR. G. (1981). The quasifirm in the construction industry. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 2(4), 335–357.
19.
EisenhardtK. M. (1989). Agency theory: An assessment and review. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 57–74.
20.
FaulknerR. R.AndersonA. B. (1987). Short-term projects and emergent careers: Evidence from Hollywood. American Journal of Sociology, 92(4), 879–909.
21.
FlyvbjergB.GardnerD. (2023). How big things get done: The surprising factors that determine the fate of every project, from home renovations to space exploration and everything in between. McClelland & Stewart.
22.
GhazimatinE.MooiE. A.HeideJ. B. (2021). Mobilizing the temporary organization: The governance roles of selection and pricing. Journal of Marketing, 85(4), 85–104.
23.
GhazimatinE.MooiE. A.HeideJ. B. (2023). Business-to-business projects, task configuration, and innovation. Journal of Marketing Research, 60(1), 72–91.
24.
GhoshM.JohnG. (1999). Governance value analysis and marketing strategy. Journal of Marketing, 63(4), 131–145.
25.
GoldfarbA.TuckerC.WangY. (2022). Conducting research in marketing with quasi-experiments. Journal of Marketing, 86(3), 1–20.
26.
GrabherG. (2002). Fragile sector, robust practice: Project ecologies in new media. Environment and Planning A, 34(11), 1911–1926.
27.
GrabherG. (2004). Temporary architectures of learning: Knowledge governance in project ecologies. Organization Studies, 25(9), 1491–1514.
28.
GranovetterM. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481–510.
29.
GreenwoodR.MillerD. (2010). Tackling design anew: Getting back to the heart of organizational theory. Academy of Management Perspectives, 24(4), 78–88.
30.
GroysbergB.LeeL.-E.NandaA. (2008). Can they take it with them? The portability of star knowledge workers’ performance. Management Science, 54(7), 1213–1230.
31.
GulatiR.WohlgezogenF.ZhelyazkovP. (2012). The two facets of collaboration: Cooperation and coordination in strategic alliances. The Academy of Management Annals, 6(1), 531–583.
32.
HadidaA. L.HeideJ. B.BellS. J. (2019). The temporary marketing organization. Journal of Marketing, 83(2), 1–18.
33.
HeideJ. B. (1994). Interorganizational governance in marketing channels. Journal of Marketing, 58(1), 71–85.
34.
HeideJ. B.JohnG. (1992). Do norms matter in marketing relationships?Journal of Marketing, 56(2), 32–44.
35.
HomburgC.WorkmanJ. P.JensenO. (2000). Fundamental changes in marketing organization: The movement toward a customer-focused organizational structure. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 28(4), 459–478.
36.
HuffR. A.PrybutokV. R. (2008). Information systems project management decision making: The influence of experience and risk propensity. Project Management Journal, 39(2), 34–47.
37.
HungY.-T.DennisA. R.RobertL. (2004). Trust in virtual teams: Towards an integrative model of trust formation. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Big Island, Hawaii.
38.
JacksonB. B. (1985). Build customer relationships that last. Harvard Business Review, 63(6), 120–128.
39.
JosephJ.GabaV. (2020). Organizational structure, information processing, and decision-making: A retrospective and road map for research. Academy of Management Annals, 14(1), 267–302.
40.
LaursenM. (2018). Project networks as constellations for value creation. Project Management Journal, 49(2), 56–70.
41.
LilienG. L.MorrisonP. D.SearlsK.SonnackM.von HippelE. (2002). Performance assessment of the lead user idea-generation process for new product development. Management Science, 48(8), 1042–1059.
42.
Livne-TarandachR.JazaieriH. (2021). Swift sense of community: Resourcing artifacts for rapid community emergence in a temporary organization. Academy of Management Journal, 64(4), 1127–1163.
43.
LovalloD.CristofaroM.FlyvbjergB. (2023). Governing large projects: A three-stage process to get it right. Academy of Management Perspectives, 37(2), 138–156.
44.
LundinR. A.ArvidssonN.BradyT.EkstedtE.MidlerC.SydowJ. (2015). Managing and working in project society: Institutional challenges of temporary organizations. Cambridge University Press.
45.
LundinR. A.SöderholmA. (1995). A theory of the temporary organization. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 11(4), 437–455.
46.
MacaulayS. (1963). Non-contractual relations in business: A preliminary study. American Sociological Review, 28(1), 55–67.
47.
MacneilI. R. (1977–1978). Contracts: Adjustment of long-term economic relations under classical, neoclassical, and relational contract law. Northwestern University Law Review, 72(6), 854–905.
48.
MacneilI. R. (1980). The new social contract: An inquiry into modern contractual relations. Yale University Press.
49.
ManningS. (2017). The rise of project network organizations: Building core teams and flexible partner pools for interorganizational projects. Research Policy, 46(8), 1399–1415.
50.
MattssonL.-G. (1973). Systems selling as a strategy on industrial markets. Industrial Marketing Management, 3(2), 107–120.
51.
McKnightD. H.CummingsL. L.ChervanyN. L. (1998). Initial trust formation in new organizational relationships. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 473–490.
52.
MeyersonD.WeickK. E.KramerR. M. (1996). Swift trust and temporary groups. In TylerT. R.KramerR. M. (Eds.), Trust in organizations: Frontiers of theory and research (pp. 166–195). Sage Publications.
53.
MingD.EliashbergJ. (2002). Structuring the new product development pipeline. Management Science, 48(3), 343–363.
54.
MooiE.SarstedtM.Mooi-ReciI. (2018). Market research: The process, data, and methods using Stata.Springer.
55.
MusawirA. U. (2025). Revisiting the principal–agent framework in the context of projects: Drawing parallels with corporate governance. Project Management Journal, 56(1), 41–56.
56.
OjansivuI. T. (2024). The concept of discontinuity in project marketing research: emergence, dissipation and glimpses of the future. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 39(3), 491–506.
57.
OuchiW. G. (1980). Markets, bureaucracies, and clans. Administrative Science Quarterly, 25(1), 129–141.
58.
ParkH.LeeJ.KimB.-C. (2015). Project selection in NIH: A natural experiment from ARRA. Research Policy, 44(6), 1145–1159.
59.
PemselS.SöderlundJ. (2025). Governance and creativity in project-based organizations: Archetypes and agenda for future research. Project Management Journal, 56(1), 141–157.
60.
PfefferJ. (1982). Organizations and organization theory. Pitman.
61.
PiercyN. F.CravensD. W. (1995). The network paradigm and the marketing organization. European Journal of Marketing, 29(3), 7–34.
62.
PoppoL.ZengerT. (2002). Do formal contracts and relational governance function as substitutes or complements?Strategic Management Journal, 23(8), 707–725.
63.
PowellW. (1990). Neither market nor hierarchy: Network forms of organization. Research in Organizational Behavior, 12, 295–336.
64.
PuranamP.RaveendranM. (2013). Interdependence & organization design. In GrandoriA. (Ed.), Handbook of economics organization (pp. 193–209). Edward Elgar.
65.
RuekertR. W.WalkerO. C.RoeringK. J. (1985). The organization of marketing activities: A contingency theory of structure and performance. Journal of Marketing, 49(1), 13–25.
66.
SankaranS.DrouinN.LocatelliG. (2025). Special issue: Project governance: Reflections on the past and suggestions for the future. Project Management Journal, 56(1), 3–14.
67.
ScarbroughH.SwanJ.LaurentS.BresnenM.EdelmanL.NewellS. (2004). Project-based learning and the role of learning boundaries. Organization Studies, 25(9), 1579–1600.
68.
SchilkeO.HuangL. (2018). Worthy of swift trust?How brief interpersonal contact affects trust accuracy. Journal of Applied Psychology, 103(11), 1181.
69.
ShehuZ.EndutI. R.AkintoyeA.HoltG. D. (2014). Cost overrun in the Malaysian construction industry projects: A deeper insight. International Journal of Project Management, 32(8), 1471–1480.
70.
SpenceM. (1973). Job market signaling. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87(3), 355–374.
71.
StarS. L.GriesemerJ. R. (1989). Institutional ecology, ‘translations’ and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley's museum of vertebrate zoology, 1907-39. Social Studies of Science, 19(3), 387–420.
72.
SteenJ.DeFillippiR.SydowJ.PrykeS.MichelfelderI. (2018). Projects and networks: Understanding resource flows and governance of temporary organizations with quantitative and qualitative research methods. Project Management Journal, 49(2), 3–17.
73.
StinchcombeA. (1990). Information and organizations. University of California Press.
74.
ThompsonJ. D. (1967). Organizations in action. McGraw-Hill.
75.
ThriftN. (2000). Performing cultures in the new economy. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 90(4), 674–692.
76.
TurnerJ. R.MüllerR. (2003). On the nature of the project as a temporary organization. International Journal of Project Management, 21(1), 1–8.
77.
TurnerJ. R.LecoeuvreL. (2017). Marketing by, for and of the project: Project marketing by three types of organizations. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 10(4), 841–855.
78.
UzziB. (1997). Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(1), 35–67.
79.
WangL.WangX.LiuX. (2025). Project governance and governance of interorganizational project networks: Toward understanding their relationships and future research agenda. Project Management Journal, 56(1), 31–40.
80.
WilliamsonO. E. (1975). Markets and hierarchies: Analysis and antitrust implications. The Free Press.
81.
WilliamsonO. E. (1985). The economic institutions of capitalism. The Free Press.
82.
WorkmanJ. P.HomburgC.GrunerK. (1998). Marketing organization: An integrative framework of dimensions and determinants. Journal of Marketing, 62(3), 21–41.
83.
XiaL.MonroeK. B.CoxJ. L. (2004). The price is unfair! A conceptual framework of price fairness perceptions. Journal of Marketing, 68(4), 1–15.
