Excellent and Respectful Reviewing: Improving the Field of Project Studies and the Quality of Our Research

Abstract

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Carpenter

M. A.

(2009). Editor's comments: Mentoring colleagues in the craft and spirit of peer review. Academy of Management Review, 34(2), 191–195.

Clegg

S. R.

Pollack

. (Eds.) (2025). Doing exemplary project management research. Elgar

Daft

. (1983). Learning the craft of organizational research. Academy of Management Review, 8(4), 539–546.

Dobusch

Plotnikof

Wenzel

. (2025). Reviewing is caring! Revaluing a critical, but invisibilized, underappreciated, and exploited academic practice. Organization, 1–17.

Geraldi

Locatelli

Söderlund

(2025). Author, review, editor: A generative conversation. Project Management Journal. In press.

Geraldi

Söderlund

. (2018). Project studies: What it is, where it is going. International Journal of Project Management, 36, 55–70.

Geraldi

Locatelli

Dei

Söderlund

Clegg

. (2024). AI for management and organization research: Examples and reflections from project studies. Project Management Journal, 55(4), 339–351.

Hazen

B. T.

Fawcett

S. E.

Ogden

J. A.

Autry

C. W.

Richey

R. G.

Ellinger

A. E

. (2016). Addressing a broken peer review process. The International Journal of Logistics

Klein

Müller

(2022). Getting past the editor’s desk. Project Management Journal, 53(6), 543–546.

10.

Lepak

(2009). Editor's comments: What is good reviewing? Academy of Management Review, 34(3), 375–381.

11.

Lenfle

Söderlund

(2025). A ten-year transition journey into project-oriented agency and regeneration. In Clegg

S. R.

Pollack

(Eds.), Doing exemplary project management research. Elgar.

12.

Lewin

A. Y

. (2014). The peer-review process: The good, the bad, the ugly, and the extraordinary. Management and Organization Review, 10(2), 167–173.

13.

Locatelli

Ika

Drouin

Müller

Huemann

Söderlund

Geraldi

Clegg

. (2023). A manifesto for project management research. European Management Review 20, 3–17.

14.

Müller

Klein

. (2018). What constitutes a contribution to Project Management Journal^®. Project Management Journal, 49(5), 3–4.

15.

Müller

Klein

. (2019a). Qualitative research submissions to Project Management Journal^®, Project Management Journal, 50(1), 3–5.

16.

Müller

Klein

. (2019b). Quantitative research submissions to Project Management Journal^®. Project Management Journal, 50(3), 1–3.

17.

Ragins

B. R.

(2015). Editor’s comments: Developing our authors. Academy of Management Review, 40(1), 1–8.

18.

Ragins

B. R.

(2017). Editor’s comments: Raising the bar for developmental reviewing. Academy of Management Review, 42(4), 573–576.

19.

Ragins

B. R

. (2018). From boxing to dancing: Creating a developmental editorial culture. Journal of Management Inquiry, 27(2), 158–163.

20.

Saunders

(2005). Editor’s comments: Thoughts on developmental reviewing. MIS Quarterly. 29(2), iii–xii.

21.

Söderlund

. (2023). Seven insights into becoming an engaged project scholar. Project Management Journal, 54(5), 1–7.

22.

Söderlund

Bakker

. (2014), The case for good reviewing. International Journal of Project Management, 32(1), 1–6.

23.

Treviño

L. K.

(2008). Editor’s comments: Why review? Because reviewing is a professional responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 33(1), 8–10.

24.

Tsang

E. W. K.

Frey

B. S

. (2007). The as-is journal review process: Let authors own their ideas. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 6(1), 128–136.

25.

Tsui

Hollenbeck

J. R

. (2009). Successful authors and effective reviewers: Balancing supply and demand in the organizational sciences. Organizational Research Methods, 12(2), 259–275.