While recent research calls for renewing project studies, few empirical works explore how design thinking can enrich project management. Based on a longitudinal case study within a company using design thinking to implement digital transformation, we analyze how design thinking supports projects involving major managerial and operational shifts, complex stakeholder environments, and ambiguous objectives. We identify key characteristics of a human-centric project management approach that addressed the difficulties faced by digital transformation and intense change projects, and we show how it helps shaping the projects by focusing on their stakeholders.
BabaeiA.LocatelliG.SainatiT. (2021). What is wrong with the front-end of infrastructure megaprojects and how to fix it: A systematic literature review. Project Leadership and Society, 2(Dec), 100032. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plas.2021.100032
3.
BadewiA. (2022). When frameworks empower their agents: The effect of organizational project management frameworks on the performance of project managers and benefits managers in delivering transformation projects successfully. International Journal of Project Management, 40(2), 132–141.
BencherkiN.SergiV.CoorenF.VásquezC. (2021). How strategy comes to matter: Strategizing is the communicative materialization of matters of concern. Strategic Organization, 19(4), 608–635. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127019890380
6.
BenMahmoud-JouiniS.CarlgrenL. (2023). Chapter 16: The contribution of design thinking to complex project organizing. In WinchG. M.BrunetM.CaoD. (Eds.), Research handbook on complex project organizing (pp. 158–167). Edward Elgar. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781800880283.00026
7.
BenMahmoud-JouiniS.MidlerC. (2020). Unpacking the notion of prototype archetypes in the early phase of an innovation process. Creativity and Innovation Management, 29(1), 49–71. https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12358
8.
BenMahmoud-JouiniS.MidlerC.SilberzahnP. (2016). Contributions of design thinking to project management in an innovation context. Project Management Journal, 47(2), 144–156. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmj.21577
9.
Benoit-Barné, C., & Cooren, F., (2009). The accomplishment of authority through personification. Management Communication Quarterly, 23, 5–31.
10.
BradyT.DaviesA. (2004). Building project capabilities: From exploratory to exploitative learning. Organization Studies, 25(9), 1601–1621.
11.
BrownT. (2008). Design thinking. Harvard Business Review, 86(6), 84–92, 141.
12.
CarlgrenL., & BenMahmoud-Jouini, S. (2022). When cultures collide: What can we learn from frictions in the implementation of design thinking?Journal of Product Innovation Management, 39(1), 44–65.
13.
CarlgrenL.RauthI.ElmquistM. (2016). Framing design thinking: The concept in idea and enactment. Creativity and Innovation Management, 25(1), 38–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12153
14.
CartelM.BoxenbaumE.AggeriF. (2019). Just for fun! How experimental spaces stimulate innovation in institutionalized fields. Organization Studies, 40(1), 65–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840617736937
15.
ClarkK. B.WheelwrightS. C. (1992). Organizing and leading “heavyweight” development teams. California Management Review, 34(3), 9–28.
16.
CorreaniA.De MassisA.FrattiniF.PetruzzelliA. M.NatalicchioA. (2020). Implementing a digital strategy: Learning from the experience of three digital transformation projects. California Management Review, 62(4), 37–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/0008125620934864
17.
DaviesA.BradyT.. (2000). Organisational capabilities and learning in complex product systems: Towards repeatable solutions. Research Policy, 29(7–8), 931–953.
18.
DaymondJ.MeisiekS.KnightE. (2024). Into the customers’ shoes: Multimodal practices for customer-centric strategizing. Organization Studies, 45(11), 1579–1609. doi.org/10.1177/01708406241273792
19.
DeanJ. W.BowenD. E. (1994)). Management theory and total quality: Improving research and practice through theory development. The Academy of Management Review, 19(3), 392–418. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1994.9412271803
20.
Dell'EraC.MagistrettiS.CautelaC.VergantiR.ZurloF. (2020). Four kinds of design thinking: From ideating to making, engaging, and criticizing. Creativity and Innovation Management, 29(2), 324–344.
21.
DenicolJ.DaviesA.KrystallisI. (2020). What are the causes and cures of poor megaproject performance?A systematic literature review and research agenda. Project Management Journal, 51(3), 328–345. https://doi.org/10.1177/8756972819896113
22.
DinizE. H.SantosT. R. R.CunhaM. A. (2022). Measuring the grand challenge of the digital transformation of society: Practices for operationalizing robust action strategies. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 70(3), 1076–1088. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2022.3212283
23.
DumezH.JeunemaîtreA. (2006). Reviving narratives in economics and management: Towards an integrated perspective of modelling, statistical inference and narratives. European Management Review, 3(1), 32–43. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.emr.1500054
24.
DunneD.MartinR. (2006). Design thinking and how it will change management education: An interview and discussion. Academy of Management Learning & Education5(4), 512–523. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2006.23473212
25.
EdmondsonA. C. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 350–383
26.
EdmondsonA. C.McManusS. E. (2007). Methodological fit in management field research. The Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1155–1179. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.26586086
27.
EdmondsonA.MogelofJ. (2006). Explaining psychological safety in innovation teams: Organizational culture, team dynamics, or personality? In ThompsonL.ChoiH.LevineJ. (Eds.), In Creativity and innovation in organizational teams (pp. 129–156). Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410615732
28.
EpplerM. J.PlattsK. W. (2009). Visual strategizing: The systematic use of visualization in the strategic-planning process. Long Range Planning, 42(1), 42–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2008.11.005
29.
EskerodP.HuemannM.RinghoferC. (2015). Stakeholder inclusiveness: Enriching project management with general stakeholder theory. Project Management Journal, 46(6), 42–53.
30.
EskerodP.VaagaasarA. L. (2014). Stakeholder management strategies and practices during a project course. Project Management Journal, 45(5), 71–85.
31.
FellowsR.LiuA. (2016). Sensemaking in the cross-cultural contexts of projects. International Journal of Project Management, 34(2), 246–257.
32.
FettermanD. M. (1989). Ethnography: Step by step. Sage Publications, Inc.
33.
GeminoA.ReichB. H. (2023). Program management within digital transformation: The emerging importance of technology architecture, product management, and human capital transformation. Project Management Journal, 54(4), 447–457. https://doi.org/10.1177/87569728231173298
GreenwoodA.LaurenB.KnottJ.DeVossD. N. (2019). Dissensus, resistance, and ideology: Design thinking as a rhetorical methodology. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 33(4), 400–424.
36.
GuinanP. J.PariseS.LangowitzN. (2019). Creating an innovative digital project team: Levers to enable digital transformation. Business Horizons,Digital Transformation & Disruption, 62(6), 717–727. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2019.07.005
37.
HaneltA.BohnsackR.MarzD.Antunes MaranteC. (2021). A systematic review of the literature on digital transformation: Insights and implications for strategy and organizational change. Journal of Management Studies, 58(5), 1159–1197. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12639
38.
HatchuelA.DavidA. (2007). Des connaissances actionnables aux théories universelles en sciences de gestion. Université Paris-Dauphine.
39.
HölzleK.RhinowH. (2019). The dilemmas of design thinking in innovation projects. Project Management Journal, 50(4), 418–430.
40.
HuangJ. Y. H.JiangR.ChangJ. Y. T. (2023). The effects of transformational and adaptive leadership on dynamic capabilities: Digital transformation projects. Project Management Journal, 54(4), 428–446. https://doi.org/10.1177/87569728231165896
41.
JiangJ. J. (2023). From information technology projects to digital transformation programs: Research pathways. Project Management Journal, 54(4), 327–333. https://doi.org/10.1177/87569728231170261
Kozak-HollandM.ProcterC. (2020). The challenge of digital transformation. In Kozak-HollandM.ProcterC. (Eds.), Managing transformation projects: Tracing lessons from the industrial to the digital revolution (pp. 1–11). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33035-4_1
44.
KreinerK. (2020). Conflicting notions of a project: The battle between Albert O. Hirschman and Bent Flyvbjerg. Project Management Journal, 51(4), 400–410.
45.
KüpersW.MantereS.StatlerM. (2013). Strategy as storytelling: A phenomenological collaboration. Journal of Management Inquiry, 22(1), 83–100. https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492612439089
46.
LangleyA. (1999). Strategies for theorizing from process data. The Academy of Management Review, 24(4), 691–710. https://doi.org/10.2307/259349
47.
LeeY. (2008). Design participation tactics: The challenges and new roles for designers in the co-design process. CoDesign, 4(1), 31–50.
LiedtkaJ. (2014). Innovative ways companies are using design thinking. Strategy & Leadership, 42(2), 40–45.
50.
LiedtkaJ. (2015). Perspective: Linking design thinking with innovation outcomes through cognitive bias reduction. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 32(6), 925–938. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12163
51.
LiedtkaJ. (2020). Putting technology in its place: Design thinking’s social technology at work. California Management Review, 62(2), 53–83.
52.
LiedtkaJ.LocatelliG. (2023). Humanising complex projects through design thinking and its effects. International Journal of Project Management, 41(4), 102483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2023.102483
53.
LiedtkaJ.OgilvieT. (2011). Designing for growth: A design thinking toolkit for managers. Columbia University Press.
54.
LittauP.JujagiriN. J.AdlbrechtG. (2010). 25 years of stakeholder theory in project management literature (1984–2009). Project Management Journal, 41(4), 17–29.
55.
LiuF.MaitlisS. (2014). Emotional dynamics and strategizing processes: A study of strategic conversations in top team meetings. Journal of Management Studies, 51(2), 202–234. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2012.01087.x
56.
LocatelliG.GrecoM.InvernizziD. C.GrimaldiM.MaliziaS. (2021). What about the people? Micro-foundations of open innovation in megaprojects. International Journal of Project Management,Managing Open and User Innovation by Projects, 39(2), 115–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2020.06.009
57.
LocatelliG.IkaL.DrouinN.MüllerR.HuemannM.SöderlundJ.GeraldiJ.CleggS. (2023). A manifesto for project management research. European Management Review, 20(1), 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/emre.12568
58.
MagistrettiS.Dell’EraC.VergantiR.BianchiM. (2022). The contribution of design thinking to the R of R&D in technological innovation. R&D Management, 52(1), 108–125.
59.
ManiakR.MidlerC. (2014). Multiproject lineage management: Bridging project management and design-based innovation strategy. International Journal of Project Management, 32(7), 1146–1156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2014.03.006
60.
MartinsuoM. (2023). Project value creation: Sensemaking, shaping and monitoring in a project network. In WinchG. M.BrunetM.CaoD. (Eds.), Research handbook on complex project organizing (pp. 283–292). Edward Elgar Publishing.
61.
MidlerC. (1995). “Projectification” of the firm: The Renault case. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 11(4), 363–375.
62.
MidlerC. (2013). Implementing a low-end disruption strategy through multiproject lineage management: The Logan case. Project Management Journal, 44(5), 24–35. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmj.21367
63.
MilesM. B.HubermanA. M., & Saldaña., (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
64.
PintoJ. K.WinchG. (2016). The unsettling of “settled science:” The past and future of the management of projects. International Journal of Project Management, 34(2), 237–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2015.07.011
65.
PrebanićK. R.VukomanovićM. (2021). Realizing the need for digital transformation of stakeholder management: A systematic review in the construction industry. Sustainability, 13(22), 12690. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132212690
66.
RiesE. (2011). The lean startup: How today’s entrepreneurs use continuous innovation to create radically successful businesses. Crown.
67.
RittelH. W. J.WebberM. M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4(2), 155–169.
68.
SahakianJ.BenMahmoud-JouiniS. (2023). Building design as a dynamic capability: A model for design integration. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 40(1), 20–39
69.
SamsetK.VoldenG. H. (2016). Front-end definition of projects: Ten paradoxes and some reflections regarding project management and project governance. International Journal of Project Management, 34(2), 297–313.
70.
SaxenaD.McDonaghJ. (2022). Communication breakdowns during business process change projects: Insights from a sociotechnical case study. International Journal of Project Management, 40(3), 181–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2021.11.011
71.
SeidelV. P.FixsonS. K. (2013). Adopting design thinking in novice multidisciplinary teams: The application and limits of design methods and reflexive practices. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 30, 19–33.
72.
SöderlundJ. (2010). Knowledge entrainment and project management: The case of large-scale transformation projects. International Journal of Project Management,European Academy of Management (EURAM2009) Conference, 28(2), 130–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2009.11.010
73.
SöderlundJ.PemselS. (2021). Changing times for digitalization: The multiple roles of temporal shifts in enabling organizational change. Human Relations, 75(5), 871–902. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726721991623
74.
SöderlundJ.TellF. (2009). The P-form organization and the dynamics of project competence: Project epochs in Asea/ABB, 1950–2000. International Journal of Project Management, 27(2), 101–112.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2008.10.010.
75.
SpradleyJ. P. (2016). The ethnographic interview. Waveland Press.
76.
SunY.TellF. (2024). Tensions in digital transformation: How prototype work links the temporary and the permanent. Project Management Journal, 56(3), 87569728241278661. https://doi.org/10.1177/87569728241278661
VergantiR.Dell’EraC.SwanK. S. (2021). Design thinking: Critical analysis and future evolution. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 38(6), 603–622.
79.
VialG. (2021). Understanding digital transformation: A review and a research agenda. In HinterhuberA.VescoviT.ChecchinatoF. (Eds.), Managing digital transformation (pp. 13–66). Routledgehttps://doi.org/10.4324/9781003008637
80.
WesselL.BaiyereA.Ologeanu-TaddeiR.ChaJ.Blegind-JensenT. (2021). Unpacking the difference between digital transformation and IT-enabled organizational transformation. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 22(1), 102–129. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00655
81.
WhyteJ. (2019). How digital information transforms project delivery models. Project Management Journal, 50(2), 177–194.
82.
WhyteJ.NaderpajouhN.CleggS.MatousP.PollackJ.CrawfordL. (2022). Project leadership: A research agenda for a changing world. Project Leadership and Society, 3(Dec), 100044. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plas.2022.100044
83.
Wu, X. (J.), Klein, G., & Jiang, J. J. (2023). On the road to digital transformation: A literature review of IT program management. Project Management Journal, 54(4), 409–427. https://doi.org/10.1177/87569728231166846
