Author,Reviewer,Editor: A Generative Conversation

Abstract

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bedeian

A. G

. (2004). Peer review and the social construction of knowledge in the management discipline. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 3(2), 198–2015.

Bedeian

A. G.

Van Fleet

D. D.

Human

H. H.

III (2009) Scientific achievement and editorial board membership. Organizational Research Methods, 12(2), 211–239.

Carpenter

M. A.

(Ed.). (2009). Editor's comments: Mentoring colleagues in the craft and spirit of peer review. Academy of Management Review, 34(2), 191–195.

Clegg

S. R.

Pollack

. (2025) (Eds.). Doing exemplary project management research. Elgar.

Daft

. (1983). Learning the craft of organizational research. Academy of Management Review, 8(4), 539–546.

Ellinger

A. D.

Jonsson

Chapman

Ellinger

A. E

. (2023). The ideal review process is a three-way street. Human Resource Development Review, 22(2), 251–274.

Geraldi

. (2021a). Plagiarism in project studies. Project Management Journal, 52(1), 3–10.

Geraldi

. (2021b). Self-plagiarism in project studies. Project Management Journal, 52(2), 119–126.

Geraldi

Locatelli

Dei

Söderlund

Clegg

. (2024). AI for management and organization research: Examples and reflections from project studies. Project Management Journal, 55(4), 339–351.

10.

Gerhardt

M. W.

Charlier

S. D.

Greenberg

. (2019). AMLE reviewer resource library: A collection of recommended pieces on developmental reviewing. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 18(1), 7–10.

11.

Hazen

B. T.

Fawcett

S. E.

Ogden

J. A.

Autry

C. W.

Richey

R. G.

Ellinger

A. E

. (2016). Addressing a broken peer review process. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 27(3), 622–628.

12.

Holzmann

Chalutz-Ben Gal

Margherita

Chua

(2025). The transformative power of artificial intelligence (AI) on project management work environments. Project Management Journal® Special Issue Call for Papers.

13.

Houry

Green

Callaham

. (2012). Does mentoring new peer reviewers improve review quality? A randomized trial. BMC Medical Education, 12, 83.

14.

Huff

. (1998). Writing for scholarly publication. Sage.

15.

Klein

Müller

(2022). Getting past the editor’s desk. Project Management Journal, 53(6), 543–546.

16.

Kuhn

. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago University Press.

17.

Lenfle

Söderlund

. (2025). A ten-year transition journey into project-oriented agency and regeneration. In Clegg

S. R.

Pollack

(Eds.), Doing exemplary project management research. Elgar.

18.

Lepak

(2009). Editor's comments: What is good reviewing? Academy of Management Review, 34(3), 375–381.

19.

Lewin

A. Y

. (2014). The peer-review process: The good, the bad, the ugly, and the extraordinary. Management and Organization Review, 10(2), 167–173.

20.

Liu

Olivola

Kovács

. (2017). Coauthorship trends in the field of management: Facts and perceptions. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 16(4), 509–530.

21.

Locatelli

Ika

Drouin

Müller

Huemann

Söderlund

Geraldi

Clegg

(2023). A manifesto for project management research. European Management Review, 20, 3–17.

22.

McMullen

Newbert

S. L

. (2023). Investing in yourself by investing in the field: The long-term benefits of reviewing. Journal of Business Venturing, 38, 106284.

23.

Müller

Klein

. (2018). What constitutes a contribution to Project Management Journal®, 49(5), 3–4.

24.

Müller

Klein

. (2019a). Qualitative research submissions to Project Management Journal®, 50(1), 3–5.

25.

Müller

Klein

. (2019b). Quantitative research submissions to Project Management Journal®, 50(3), 1–3.

26.

Orsatti

Cuzzocrea

De Poli

Locatelli

(2025). Towards net-zero: Success factors of tertiary building energy efficiency retrofitting projects. Journal of Building Engineering, 103, 112087.

27.

Ragins

B. R.

(2015): Editor’s comments: Developing our authors. Academy of Management Review, 40(1), 1–8.

28.

Ragins

B. R.

(2017). Editor’s comments: Raising the bar for developmental reviewing. Academy of Management Review, 42(4), 573–576.

29.

Ragins

B. R

. (2018). From boxing to dancing: Creating a developmental editorial culture. Journal of Management Inquiry, 27(2), 158–163.

30.

Schminke

(2002): From the editors: Tensions. Academy of Management Journal, 45(3), 487–490.

31.

Söderlund

. (2023). Seven insights into becoming an engaged project scholar. Project Management Journal, 54(5), 1–7.

32.

Söderlund

Bakker

. (2014), The case for good reviewing. International Journal of Project Management, 32(1), 1–6.

33.

Treviño

L. K.

(2008). Editor’s comments: Why review? Because reviewing is a professional responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 33(1), 8–10.

34.

Tsang

E. W. K.

Frey

B. S

. (2007). The as-is journal review process: Let authors own their ideas. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 6(1), 128–136.

35.

Tsui

Hollenbeck

J. R

. (2009). Successful authors and effective reviewers: Balancing supply and demand in the organizational sciences. Organizational Research Methods, 12(2), 259–275.

36.

Whetten

. (1989). What constitutes a theoretical contribution? Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 490–495.

37.

Whyte

Comi

Mosca

Wenzel

. (2025). Future making through projects. Project Management Journal® Special Issue Call for Papers.