In this thoughtlet I propose to expand current thinking about projects and temporary organizations to consider ecologies of temporary organizations. In this perspective, temporary organizations transcend the boundaries of permanent organizations to form quasi-permanent ecologies. I develop a triangular–recursive model of interaction between temporary organizing, temporary organizations, and ecologies of temporary organizations. Taking a time-as-process view, I consider the recursive processes to pivot around acts of temporary organizing.
BaradK. (2003). Posthumanist performativity: Toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 28(3), 801–831.
3.
BatesonG. (1972). Steps to an ecology of mind. Ballantine.
4.
BlagoevB.HernesT.KunischS.SchultzM. (2024). Time as a research lens: A conceptual review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 50(6), 2152–2196.
5.
CleggS.NinanJ. (2023). Unravelling governmentality in project ecologies. Project Leadership and Society, 4, 100099.
6.
DilleT.HernesT.VaagaasarA. L. (2023). Stuck in temporal translation? Challenges of discrepant temporal structures in interorganizational project collaboration. Organization Studies, 44(6), 867–888.
7.
EngwallM. (2003). No project is an island: Linking projects to history and context. Research Policy, 32(5), 789–808.
8.
EngwallMWestlingG. (2004). Peripety in an R&D drama: Capturing a turnaround in project dynamics. Organization Studies, 25(9), 1557–1578.
9.
GiddensA. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Polity Press.
10.
GrabherG. (2002). The project ecology of advertising: tasks, talents and teams. Regional Studies, 3(9), 245–262.
11.
GrabherG. (2004). Temporary architectures of learning: Knowledge governance in project ecologies. Organization Studies, 25(9), 1491–1514.
12.
GrabherG.IbertO. (2011). Project ecologies: A contextual view on temporary organizations. In MorrisP. W. G.PintoJ. K.SöderlundJ. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of project management (pp. 175–198). Oxford University Press.
13.
GrabherG.ThielJ. (2015). Projects, people, professions: Trajectories of learning through a mega-event (the London 2012 case). Geoforum, 65, 328–337.
14.
HernesT. (2014). A process theory of organization. Oxford University Press.
15.
HernesT. (2022). Organization and time. Oxford University Press.
16.
HernesT.SimpsonB.SöderlundJ. (2013). Managing and temporality. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 29(1), 1–6.
17.
JensenA.ThuesenC.GeraldiJ. (2016). The projectification of everything: Projects as a human condition. Project Management Journal, 47(3), 21–34.
18.
KreinerK. (1995). In search of relevance: Project management in drifting environments. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 11(4), 335–346.
19.
LangleyA. (1999). Strategies for theorizing from process data. Academy of Management Review, 24, 691–710.
20.
LøwendahlB. R. (1995). Organizing the Lillehammer Olympic winter games. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 11(4), 347–362.
21.
LuhmannN. (1995). Social systems. Stanford University Press.
22.
LundinR. A.SöderholmA. (1995). A theory of the temporary organization. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 11(4), 437–455.
23.
MartinsuoM.GeraldiJ. (2020). Management of project portfolios: Relationships of project portfolios with their contexts. International Journal of Project Management, 38(7), 441–453.
24.
NewellS.GoussevskaiaA.SwanJ.BresnenM.ObembeA. (2008). Interdependencies in complex project ecologies: The case of biomedical innovation. Long Range Planning, 41(1), 33–54.
25.
PackendorffJ. (1995). Inquiring into the temporary organization: New directions for project management research. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 11(4), 319–333.
26.
ShotterJ. (2006). Understanding process from within: An argument for ‘withness’ thinking, Organization Studies,27(4), 585–604.
27.
SöderlundJ. (2004). On the broadening scope of the research on projects: A review and a model for analysis. International Journal of Project Management, 22(8), 655–667.
28.
StjerneI. S.SvejenovaS. (2016). Connecting temporary and permanent organizing: Tensions and boundary work in sequential film projects. Organization Studies, 37(12), 1771–1792.
29.
SydowJ. (2017). Temporary organizing—The end of organizations as we know them?. Rutgers Business Review, 2(2), 199–204.
30.
SydowJ.StaberU. (2002). The institutional embeddedness of project networks: The case of content production in German television. Regional Studies, 36(3), 215–227.
31.
SydowJ.WindelerA. (2020). Temporary organizing and permanent contexts. Current Sociology, 68(4), 480–498.
32.
TurnerJ. R.MüllerR. (2003). On the nature of the project as a temporary organization. International Journal of Project Management, 21(1), 1–8.
33.
VaagaasarA. L.DilleT.HernesT. (2023). Temporality. In WinchG.BrunetM.DongpingCao (Eds.), Research handbook on complex project organizing (pp. 46–54). Edward Elgar Publishing.
34.
VaagaasarA. L.HernesT.DilleT. (2020). The challenges of implementing temporal shifts in temporary organizations: Implications of a situated temporal view. Project Management Journal, 51(4), 420–428.
35.
WhiteheadA. N. (1929). Process and reality. The Free Press.
36.
XuS. M. (2021). Boundary-salient collaboration projects: An ethnographic exploration into university-industry collaboration processes. Department of Food and Resource Economics, Faculty of Science, University of Copenhagen.
