Confronted with unexpected events, project resilience is significant for megaproject delivery success. A fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis is used to explore the practical configuration conditions for project resilience in 81 megaprojects. The findings verify the complementary effect of social capital and dynamic capabilities on project resilience and reveal that the antecedent configuration conditions for proactive and reactive resilience differ. Our study broadens the literature on antecedents of project resilience and expands their complex relationship based on resource-based and dynamic-capability views. Moreover, it provides practical strategies to improve megaprojects’ proactive and reactive resilience.
ArthurWinfredWoehrJ.& MaldegenD. J., R. (2000). Convergent and discriminant validity of assessment center dimensions: A conceptual and empirical reexamination of the assessment center construct-related validity paradox. Journal of Management, 26(4), 813–835.
2.
BarretoI. (2009). Dynamic capabilities: A review of past research and an agenda for the future. Journal of Management, 36(1), 256–280. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206309350776
3.
BartschV.EbersM.MaurerI. (2013). Learning in project-based organizations: The role of project teams’ social capital for overcoming barriers to learning. International Journal of Project Management, 31(2), 239–251. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2012.06.009
BourdieuP. (1986). The forms of capital. In The sociology of economic life (pp. 78–92). Routledge.
6.
CarmeliA.LeviA.PecceiR. (2021). Resilience and creative problem-solving capacities in project teams: A relational view. International Journal of Project Management, 39(5), 546–556. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2021.03.007
7.
CastelblancoG.FenoalteaE. M.De MarcoA.DemagistrisP.PetruzziS.ZeppegnoD. (2024). Combining stakeholder and risk management: Multilayer network analysis for complex megaprojects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 150(2), 04023161. doi: https://doi.org/10.1061/jcemd4.coeng-13807
8.
ChowdhuryM. M. H.QuaddusM. (2017). Supply chain resilience: Conceptualization and scale development using dynamic capability theory. International Journal of Production Economics, 188, 185–204. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.03.020
9.
DanielE.DanielP. A. (2019). Megaprojects as complex adaptive systems: The Hinkley point C case. International Journal of Project Management, 37(8), 1017–1033. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2019.05.001
10.
De MarcoA.RafeleC.ThaheemM. J. (2016). Dynamic management of risk contingency in complex design-build projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 142(2), 04015080. doi: https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0001052
11.
DenicolJ.DaviesA.KrystallisI. (2020). What are the causes and cures of poor megaproject performance?A systematic literature review and research agenda. Project Management Journal, 51(3), 328–345. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/8756972819896113
12.
Di VincenzoF.MasciaD. (2012). Social capital in project-based organizations: Its role, structure, and impact on project performance. International Journal of Project Management, 30(1), 5–14. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2011.03.006
13.
DoH.BudhwarP.ShiptonH.NguyenH.-D.NguyenB. (2022). Building organizational resilience, innovation through resource-based management initiatives, organizational learning and environmental dynamism. Journal of Business Research, 141, 808–821. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.11.090
14.
DuY.KimP. H. (2021). One size does not fit all: Strategy configurations, complex environments, and new venture performance in emerging economies. Journal of Business Research, 124, 272–285. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.11.059
DulJ.van der LaanE.KuikR. (2018). A statistical significance test for necessary condition analysis. Organizational Research Methods, 23(2), 385–395. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428118795272
EvensethL. L.SydnesM.GausdalA. H. (2022). Building organizational resilience through organizational learning: A systematic review. Frontiers in Communication, 7, 837386. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2022.837386
20.
FainshmidtS.WittM. A.AguileraR. V.VerbekeA. (2020). The contributions of qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) to international business research. Journal of International Business Studies, 51(4), 455–466. doi: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-020-00313-1
21.
FissP. C. (2011). Building better causal theories: A fuzzy set approach to typologies in organization research. Academy of Management Journal, 54(2), 393–420.
22.
FlynnB. B.SakakibaraS.SchroederR. G.BatesK. A.FlynnE. J. (1990). Empirical research methods in operations management. Journal of Operations Management, 9(2), 250–284.
23.
FlyvbjergB. (2014). What you should know about megaprojects and why: An overview. Project Management Journal, 45(2), 6–19. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/pmj.21409
24.
GondiaA.EzzeldinM.El-DakhakhniW. (2022). Dynamic networks for resilience-driven management of infrastructure projects. Automation in Construction, 136, 104149. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2022.104149
25.
HansenL. K.SvejvigP. (2022). Seven decades of project portfolio management research (1950–2019) and perspectives for the future. Project Management Journal, 53(3), 277–294.
26.
HetemiE.GemündenH. G.MeréJ. O. (2020). Embeddedness and actors’ behaviors in large-scale project life cycle: Lessons learned from a high-speed rail project in Spain. Journal of Management in Engineering, 36(6), 05020014. doi: https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)me.1943-5479.0000849
27.
HuY.ChanA. P. C.LeY.JinR.-z. (2015). From construction megaproject management to complex project management: Bibliographic analysis. Journal of Management in Engineering, 31(4), 04014052. doi: https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)me.1943-5479.0000254
28.
Iao-JörgensenJ. (2023). Antecedents to bounce forward: A case study tracing the resilience of inter-organisational projects in the face of disruptions. International Journal of Project Management, 41(2), 102440. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2023.102440
29.
Jerez-GómezP.Céspedes-LorenteJ.Valle-CabreraR. (2005). Organizational learning capability: A proposal of measurement. Journal of Business Research, 58(6), 715–725. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2003.11.002
30.
JiaX.ChowdhuryM.PrayagG.Hossan ChowdhuryM. M. (2020). The role of social capital on proactive and reactive resilience of organizations post-disaster. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 48, 101614. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101614
31.
KayaB.AbubakarM. A.BehraveshE.YildizH.MertI. S. (2020). Antecedents of innovative performance: Findings from PLS-SEM and fuzzy sets (fsQCA). Journal of Business Research, 114, 278–289. doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.04.016.
32.
KoskinenK. U. (2012). Organizational learning in project-based companies: A process thinking approach. Project Management Journal, 43(3), 40–49. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/pmj.21266
33.
LeeC.-Y.ChongH.-Y. (2021). Influence of prior ties on trust and contract functions for BIM-enabled EPC megaproject performance. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 147(7), 04021057. doi: https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0002076
34.
LeeJ.ParkJ.-G.LeeS. (2015). Raising team social capital with knowledge and communication in information systems development projects. International Journal of Project Management, 33(4), 797–807. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2014.12.001
35.
LeppänenP.GeorgeG.AlexyO. (2023). When do novel business models lead to high performance? A configurational approach to value drivers, competitive strategy, and firm environment. Academy of Management Journal, 66(1), 164–194. doi: https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2020.0969
36.
LiY.LuY.TaylorJ. E.HanY. (2018). Bibliographic and comparative analyses to explore emerging classic texts in megaproject management. International Journal of Project Management, 36(2), 342–361. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.05.008
37.
LinY.WuL.-Y. (2014). Exploring the role of dynamic capabilities in firm performance under the resource-based view framework. Journal of Business Research, 67(3), 407–413. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.12.019
38.
MaL.FuH. (2020). Exploring the influence of project complexity on the mega construction project success: A qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) method. Engineering,Construction and Architectural Management, 27(9), 2429–2449. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/ecam-12-2019-0679
39.
MaoY.LiP.LiY. (2023). The relationship between slack resources and organizational resilience: The moderating role of dual learning. Heliyon, 9(3), 1–12. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e14044
40.
McKnightB.ZietsmaC. (2018). Finding the threshold: A configurational approach to optimal distinctiveness. Journal of Business Venturing, 33(4), 493–512. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2018.03.004
41.
MoranP. (2005). Structural vs. relational embeddedness: Social capital and managerial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 26(12), 1129–1151. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.486
42.
MorkanB.BertelsH. M. J.ShethA.HolahanP. J. (2023). Building megaproject resilience with stakeholders: The roles of citizenship behavior and critical transition mechanisms. International Journal of Project Management, 41(5), 102485. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2023.102485
43.
MousaM.AbdelgaffarH. A.ChaoualiW.AboramadanM. (2020). Organizational learning, organizational resilience and the mediating role of multi-stakeholder networks: A study of Egyptian academics. Journal of Workplace Learning, 32(3), 161–181.
44.
NaderpajouhN.MatinheikkiJ.KeeysL. A.AldrichD. P.LinkovI. (2023). Resilience science: Theoretical and methodological directions from the juncture of resilience and projects. International Journal of Project Management, 41(8), 102544. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2023.102544
45.
NahapietJ.GhoshalS. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242–266. doi: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1998.533225
46.
NietoM.González-ÁlvarezN. (2014). Social capital effects on the discovery and exploitation of entrepreneurial opportunities. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 12(2), 507–530. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-014-0353-0
47.
O’Leary-KellyS. W.VokurkaR. J. (1998). The empirical assessment of construct validity. Journal of Operations Management, 16(4), 387–405. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-6963(98)00020-5
48.
OrdaniniA.ParasuramanA.RuberaG. (2014). When the recipe is more important than the ingredients: A qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) of service innovation configurations. Journal of Service Research, 17(2), 134–149. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670513513337
49.
PappasI. O.WoodsideA. G. (2021). Fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA): Guidelines for research practice in information systems and marketing. International Journal of Information Management, 58, 102310. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102310
50.
PavezI.GómezH.LauliéL.GonzálezV. A. (2021). Project team resilience: The effect of group potency and interpersonal trust. International Journal of Project Management, 39(6), 697–708. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2021.06.004
51.
PortesA. (1998). Social capital: Its origins and applications in modern sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 24(1), 1–24.
52.
RaginC. C. (2006). Set relations in social research: Evaluating their consistency and coverage. Political Analysis, 14(3), 291–310. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpj019
53.
RaginC. C. (2008). Redesigning social inquiry: Fuzzy sets and beyond. University of Chicago Press.
54.
RaginC. C. (2018). User’s guide to fuzzy-set/qualitative comparative analysis 3.0. Department of Sociology, University of California.
55.
RaginC. C.StrandS. I. (2008). Using qualitative comparative analysis to study causal order: Comment on Caren and Panofsky (2005). Sociological Methods & Research, 36(4), 431–441. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124107313903
56.
RichardMakadok (2001). Toward a synthesis of the resource-based and dynamic-capability views of rent creation. Strategic Management Journal, 22(5), 387–401. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.158
57.
ShiC.ChenY.YouJ.YaoH. (2018). Asset specificity and contractors’ opportunistic behavior: Moderating roles of contract and trust. Journal of Management in Engineering, 34(5), 04018026. doi: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000632
58.
TsaiW.GhoshalS. (1998). Social capital and value creation: The role of intrafirm networks. The Academy of Management Journal, 41(4), 464–476.
59.
WangB.GengL.DangP.ZhangL. (2022). Developing a framework for dynamic organizational resilience analysis in prefabricated construction projects: A project life cycle perspective. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 148(10), 04022110. doi: https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0002381
60.
WangL.MüllerR.ZhuF. (2022). Network governance for interorganizational temporary organizations: A systematic literature review and research agenda. Project Management Journal, 54(1), 35–51. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/87569728221125924
61.
WangL.YangX.ZhuF.KlakeggO. J. (2023). How governance of interorganizational projects develops resilience: Mediating role of resource reconfiguration. Journal of Management in Engineering, 39(2), 04022076. doi: https://doi.org/10.1061/jmenea
62.
WangD.ZhaoX.ZhangK. (2022). Factors affecting organizational resilience in megaprojects: A leader–employee perspective. Engineering,Construction and Architectural Management, 30(10), 4590–4608. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/ecam-01-2022-0049
63.
WuG.LiH.WuC.HuZ. (2020). How different strengths of ties impact project performance in megaprojects: The mediating role of trust. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 13(4), 889–912. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/ijmpb-09-2019-0220
64.
WulandhariN. B. I.GölgeciI.MishraN.SivarajahU.GuptaS. (2022). Exploring the role of social capital mechanisms in cooperative resilience. Journal of Business Research, 143, 375–386. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.01.026
65.
YahiamarzoukY.JinJ. F. (2023). Linking environmental scanning and organizational learning with organizational resilience of Egyptian SMEs: The moderating role of environmental uncertainty International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 31(6), 2753–2792. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/ijoa-12-2021-3066
66.
YangX.WangL.ZhuF.MüllerR. (2022). Prior and governed stakeholder relationships: The key to resilience of inter-organizational projects. International Journal of Project Management, 40(1), 64–75. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2021.10.001
67.
ZhangX.LiuM.LeY.WeiJ.ZhuY.LiY. (2023). Deconstructing organizational capabilities of megaproject owners: Dimensions and levels. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 149(7), 04023055. doi: https://doi.org/10.1061/JCEMD4.COENG-13097
68.
ZhangPeihuaNF. F.. (2013). Explaining knowledge-sharing intention in construction teams in Hong Kong. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 139(3), 280–293. doi: https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862
69.
ZhangS.ZhangF.XueB.WangD.LiuB. (2023). Unpacking resilience of project organizations: A capability-based conceptualization and measurement of project resilience. International Journal of Project Management, 41(8), 102541. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2023.102541
70.
ZhengX.ChenJ.HanY.RenL.ShiQ. (2021). Unveiling complex relational behavior in megaprojects: A qualitative-quantitative network approach. International Journal of Project Management, 39(7), 738–749. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2021.07.001
71.
ZhengH.LiD.WuJ.XuY. (2014). The role of multidimensional social capital in crowdfunding: A comparative study in China and US. Information & Management, 51(4), 488–496. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2014.03.003
