AbbottA. (1988). The system of professions: An essay on the division of expert labor. University of Chicago Press.
2.
AbbottA. (1991). The future of professions: Occupations and expertise in the age of organization. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 8, 17–42.
3.
AghajaniM.RugeG.JugdevK. (2023). An integrative review of project portfolio management literature: Thematic findings on sustainability mindset, assessment, and integration. Project Management Journal, 54(6), 87569728231172668.
4.
BlampiedN.ButtrickR.JucanG.PineyC.StevensC.VioletteD.Max WidemanR. (2023). In search of project management principles. Project Management Journal, 54(6), 87569728231158261.
5.
BrintS. (2001). Professionals and the ‘knowledge economy:’ Rethinking the theory of postindustrial society. Current Sociology, 49(4), 101–132.
6.
Carr-SaundersA. M.WilsonP. A. (1933). The professions. Clarendon Press.
7.
ChbalyH.BrunetM. (2023). Empowering users as a principle of construction project management. Project Management Journal, 54(6), 87569728231176686.
8.
ChiuY. C. (2010). An introduction to the history of project management. Eburton Academic Publishers.
9.
DefoeD. (1697). An essay upon projects. Cassell.
10.
FreidsonE. (1986). Professional powers: A study of the institutionalization of formal knowledge. University of Chicago Press.
11.
GarelG. (2013). A history of project management models: From pre-models to the standard model. International Journal of Project Management, 31(5), 663–669.
12.
GillardS. (2009). Soft skills and technical expertise of effective project managers. Issues in Informing Science & Information Technology, 6, 723–729.
13.
GormanE. H.SandefurR. L. (2011). “Golden age,” quiescence, and revival: How the sociology of professions became the study of knowledge-based work. Work & Occupations, 38(3), 275–302.
14.
HagaW. J. (1976). Managerial professionalism and the use of organization resources. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 35(4), 337–348.
15.
HansenL. K.SvejvigP. (2023). Principles in project portfolio management: Building upon what we know to prepare for the future. Project Management Journal, 54(6), 87569728231178427.
16.
HodgsonD. E.CicmilS. (Eds.) (2006). Making projects critical. Palgrave Macmillan.
17.
HodgsonD. E.MuzioD. (2011). Prospects for professionalism in project management. In MorrisP. W. G.PintoJ.SoderlundJ. (Eds.), Oxford handbook of project management. Oxford University Press.
18.
KoskellaL.HowellsG. (2002). The underlying theory of project management is dead. Research ConferencePMI, pp. 293–302.
19.
Kozak-HollandM. (2011). The history of project management. Multi-Media.
20.
LarsonM. S. (2013). The rise of professionalism: Monopolies of competence and sheltered markets (2nd ed.). New Brunswick Transaction Publishers.
21.
LarsonM. S. (2018). Professions today: Self-criticism and reflections for the future. Sociologia,Problemas e Práticas, 88, 27–42.
22.
LichtenbergS. (1989). New project management principles for the conception stage: Outline of a new ‘generation.’International Journal of Project Management, 7(1), 46–51.
23.
MacdonaldK. M. (1995). The sociology of the professions. SAGE Publications Ltd.
24.
MachlupF. (1962). Knowledge and knowledge production (Vol. 1). Princeton University Press.
25.
MalinN. (2017). Theoretical frameworks used in studying professions. Social Work & Social Sciences Review, 19(1), 7–30.
26.
MillersonG. (1964). The qualifying associations: A study in professionalization. Routledge & Kegan Paul.
27.
MorrisP. W. G. (1994). The management of projects. Thomas Telford.
28.
MorrisP. W. G. (2013). Reconstructing project management reprised: A knowledge perspective. Project Management Journal, 44(5), 6–23.
29.
MorrisP. W. G.GeraldiJ. (2011). Managing the institutional context of projects. Project Management Journal, 42(6), 20–32.
30.
MorrisP. W. G.CrawfordL.HodgsonD.ShepherdM. M.ThomasJ. (2006). Exploring the role of formal bodies of knowledge in defining a profession: The case of project management. International Journal of Project Management, 24(8), 710–721.
31.
Project Management Institute (PMI). (1983). Special report: Ethics, standards accreditation. Project Management Quarterly, (August), 11–64.
32.
SaksM. (2010). Analyzing the professions: The case for the neo-Weberian Approach. Comparative Sociology, 9, 887–915.
33.
SaksM. (2016). A review of theories of professions, organizations and society: The case for neo-Weberianism, neo-institutionalism and eclecticism. Journal of Professions & Organization, 3(2), 1–18.
34.
SankaranS.JacobssonM.BlomquistT. (2021). The history and future of projects as a transition innovation: Towards a sustainable project management framework. Systems Research and Behavioural Science, 38, 696–714.
35.
ShenharA.DvirD. (2007). Project management research: The challenge and opportunity. Project Management Journal, 38(2), 93–99.
36.
ShepherdM.AtkinsonR. (2011). Project management bodies of knowledge: Conjectures and refutations. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 9(2), 152–158.
37.
SmithA. (1776). The wealth of nations (Books I-III). Penguin Books, 1982.
38.
SusskindR. E.SusskindD. (2015). The future of the professions: How technology will transform the work of human experts. Oxford University Press.
39.
WidemanR. M. (1995). Criteria for a project management body of knowledge. International Journal of Project Management, 13(2), 71–75.
40.
WilenskyH. L. (1964). The professionalization of everyone?American Journal of Sociology, 70(2), 137–158.
41.
WillisB. E. (1995). APM project-management body of knowledge: The European view. International Journal of Project Management, 13(2), 95–98.
42.
ZeivotsS.CramA.WardakD. (2023). Developing project management principles by examining codesign practices in innovative contexts. Project Management Journal, 54(6), 87569728231176924.
43.
ZwermanB. L.ThomasJ. L.HaydtS. M. (2002). Exploring the past to map the future: Investigating the development of established professions to understand the professionalization of project management. In SlevinD. P.ClelandD. I.PintoJ. K. (Eds.), PMI Research Conference (pp. 531–536). Project Management Institute.