BecharaJ.Van de VenA. H. (2011). Triangulating philosophies of science to understand complex organizational and managerial problems. In TsoukasH.ChiaR. (Eds.), Philosophy and organization theory (pp. 312–342). Emerald Books.
2.
BirolloG.TeerikangasS. (2019). Integration projects as relational spaces: A closer look at acquired managers’ strategic role recovery in cross-border acquisitions. International Journal of Project Management, 37(8), 1003–1016.
3.
BrymanA. (2007). Barriers to integrating quantitative and qualitative research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(1), 8–22.
4.
CameronR.SankaranS. (2013). Mixed methods research design: Well beyond the notion of triangulation. In DrouinN.MüllerR.SankaranS. (Eds.), Novel approaches to organizational project management research: Translational and transformational (pp. 383–401). CBS Press.
5.
ClarkV. L. P.BadieeM. (2010). Research questions in mixed methods research. In TashakkoriA.TeddlieC. (Eds.), SAGE handbook of mixed methods social & behavioral research (pp. 275–304). SAGE.
6.
CreswellJ. W.CreswellJ. D. (2018). Research designs: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE.
7.
GreeneJ. C. (2007). Mixed methods in social inquiry (Vol. 9). John Wiley & Sons.
8.
GreeneJ.HallJ. N. (2010). Dialectics and pragmatism. In TashakkoriA.TeddlieC. (Eds.), SAGE handbook of mixed methods social & behavioral research (pp. 119–144). SAGE.
9.
JiangJ. J.TsaiJ. C. A. (2019). Getting published in PAJAIS: A practical guide from the editors perspective. Pacific Asia Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 11(2), article 1, 1–15.
10.
JoslinR.MüllerR. (2016). Identifying interesting project phenomena using philosophical and methodological triangulation. International Journal of Project Management, 34(6), 1043–1056.
11.
KleinG.MüllerR. (2019). Quantitative research submissions to Project Management Journal®. Project Management Journal, 50(3), 263–265.
12.
MorganD. L. (2007). Paradigms lost and pragmatism regained: Methodological implications of combining qualitative and quantitative methods. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(1), 48–76.
13.
MüllerR.GlücklerJ.AubryM.ShaoJ. (2013). Project management knowledge flows in networks of project managers and project management offices: A case study in the pharmaceutical industry. Project Management Journal, 44(2), 4–19.
14.
MüllerR.KleinG. (2018). What constitutes a contemporary contribution to Project Management Journal®?Project Management Journal, 49(5), 3–4.
15.
MüllerR.KleinG. (2019). Qualitative research submissions to Project Management Journal®. Project Management Journal, 50(1), 3–5.
16.
OnwuegbuzieA. J.JohnsonR. B. (2006). The validity issue in mixed research. Research in the Schools, 13(1), 48–63.
17.
SaundersM.LewisP.ThornhillA. (2019). Research methods for business students (8th ed.). Pearson Education.
18.
TashakkoriA.JohnsonR. B.TeddlieC. (2020). Foundations of mixed methods research: Integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches in the social and behavioral sciences. SAGE.
19.
TashakkoriA.TeddlieC. (2010). SAGE handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research. SAGE.
20.
ThakurtaR. (2017). Identifying the motives for user participation in information system projects. Pacific Asia Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 9(3), article 5,67–96.
21.
VenkateshV.BrownS. A.SullivanY. W. (2016). Guidelines for conducting mixed-methods research: An extension and illustration. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 17(7), 435–495.