Ahmadi-JavidA.FateminiaS. H.GemündenH. G. (2020). A method for risk response planning in project portfolio management. Project Management Journal, 51(1), 77–95.doi:10.1177/8756972819866577
2.
BaskervilleR. L.KaulM.StoreyV. C. (2015). Genres of inquiry in design-science research. MIS Quarterly, 39(3), 541–564.
3.
GuoN.GuoP.MadhavanR.ZhaoJ.LiuY. (2020). Assessing the vulnerability of megaprojects using complex network theory. Project Management Journal, 51(4), 429–439.doi:10.1177/8756972820911236
4.
KleinG.MüllerR. (2020). Literature review expectations of Project Management Journal®. Project Management Journal, 51(3), 239–241.doi:10.1177/8756972820916340
5.
MüllerR.KleinG. (2018). What constitutes a contemporary contribution to Project Management Journal®?Project Management Journal, 49(5), 3–4.doi:10.1177/8756972818791650
6.
OrdoñezR. E. C.VanhouckeM.CoelhoJ.AnholonR.NovaskiO. (2019). A study of the critical chain project management method applied to a multiproject system. Project Management Journal, 50(3), 322–334.doi:10.1177/8756972819832203
7.
RumeserD.EmsleyM. (2019). Can serious games improve project management decision making under complexity?Project Management Journal, 50(1), 23–39.doi:10.1177/8756972818808982
8.
SperryR. C.JetterA. J. (2019). A systems approach to project stakeholder management: Fuzzy cognitive map modeling. Project Management Journal, 50(6), 699–715.doi:10.1177/8756972819847870
9.
van OorschotK. E.SenguptaK.Van WassenhoveL. N. (2018). Under pressure: The effects of iteration lengths on agile software development performance. Project Management Journal, 49(6), 78–102.
10.
WeigandH.JohannessonP.AnderssonB. (2021). An artifact ontology for design science research. Data & Knowledge Engineering, 133(1), 1–19.doi:10.1016/j.datak.2021.101878
