BlomquistT.HällgrenM.NilssonA.SöderholmA. (2010). Project-as-practice: In search of project management research that matters. Project Management Journal, 41(1), 5–16.doi:10.1002/pmj.20141
3.
CabantousL.SergiV. (2018). Seeing the potentialities at the intersection: A reflection on performativity and processuality mindsets. Management, 21(4), 1229–1243.doi:10.3917/mana.214.1229
4.
ChiaR. (1997). Essai: Thirty years on: From organizational structures to the organization of thought. Organization Studies, 18(4), 685–707.doi:10.1177/017084069701800406
5.
CicmilS.WilliamsT.ThomasJ.HodgsonD. (2006). Rethinking project management: Researching the actuality of projects. International Journal of Project Management, 24(8), 675–686.doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2006.08.006
6.
CoorenF.KuhnT.CornelissenJ. P.ClarkT. (2011). Communication, organizing and organization: An overview and introduction to the special issue. Organization Studies, 32(9), 1149–1170.doi:10.1177/0170840611410836
7.
GeraldiJ.SöderlundJ. (2016). Project studies and engaged scholarship: Directions towards contextualized and reflexive research on projects. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 9(4), 767–797.
8.
GeraldiJ.SöderlundJ. (2018). Project studies: What it is, where it is going. International Journal of Project Management, 36(1), 55–70.doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.06.004
9.
GherardiS. (2019). How to conduct a practice-based study: Problems and methods (2nd ed.). Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.
10.
GondJ. -P.CabantousL.HardingN.LearmonthM. (2016). What do we mean by performativity in organizational and management theory? The uses and abuses of performativity. International Journal of Management Reviews, 18(4), 440–463.doi:10.1111/ijmr.12074
11.
HarveyJ.AubryM. (2018). Project and processes: A convenient but simplistic dichotomy. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 38(6), 1289–1311.doi:10.1108/IJOPM-01-2017-0010
12.
HelinJ.HernesT.HjorthD.HoltR.. (Eds.). (2014). The Oxford handbook of process philosophy and organization studies. Oxford University Press.
13.
HernesT. (2014). A process theory of organization: Oxford University Press.
14.
HernesT.WeikE. (2007). Organization as process: Drawing a line between endogenous and exogenous views. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 23(3), 251–264.doi:10.1016/j.scaman.2007.06.002
15.
LangleyA.TsoukasH. (2017). Introduction: Process thinking, process theorizing and process researching. InLangleyA.TsoukasH. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of process organization studies (pp.1–26). SAGE.
16.
NiedermanF.MüllerB.MarchS. T. (2018). Using process theory for accumulating project management knowledge: A seven-category model. Project Management Journal, 49(1), 6–24.doi:10.1177/875697281804900102
17.
OrlikowskiW. J.ScottS. (2008). 10 Sociomateriality: Challenging the separation of technology, work and organization. Academy of Management Annals, 2(1), 433–474.doi:10.5465/19416520802211644
18.
PackendorffJ.CrevaniL.LindgrenM. (2014). Project leadership in becoming: A process study of an organizational change project. Project Management Journal, 45(3), 5–20.doi:10.1002/pmj.21418
19.
RescherN. (1996). Process metaphysics: An introduction to process philosophy. State University of New York Press.
SchoenebornD.VásquezC. (2017). Communicative constitution of organizations. InScottC. R.BarkerJ. R.KuhnT.KeytonJ.TurnerP. K.LewisL. K. (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of organizational communication (pp.1–21). Wiley.
ZwikaelO.MeredithJ. R. (2019). Effective organizational support practices for setting target benefits in the project front end. International Journal of Project Management, 37(7), 930–939.doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2019.08.001