This article contributes a practice-based approach to project management by opening up to the messiness and unpredictabilities involved in actually doing project work. Drawing on the Pragmatist ideas of John Dewey, we theorize projects-as-practices (noun) and projects-as-practice (verb) as complementary concepts that are built respectively on ontologies of being and becoming. For the purposes of this article, we define the notion of project as an emergent social process of becoming, bounded in time and space, and generative of novel outcomes. We also contribute methodologically by proposing Dewey’s Inquiry as a guide to shadowing the bounded becomingness of projects-as-practice (verb). Using an empirical illustration from a Health and Social Care Partnership in Scotland, we highlight the inherently emergent nature of projects as they bring about transformational change.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BalM. (2002). Travelling concepts in the humanities: A rough guide. University of Toronto Press.
BlomquistT.HällgrenM.NilssonA.SöderholmA. (2010). Project-as-practice: In search of project management research that matters. Project Management Journal, 41(1), 5–16.doi:10.1002/pmj.20141
4.
BredilletC. N.TywoniakS.DwivedulaR. (2015). Reconnecting theory and practice in pluralistic contexts: Issues and Aristotelian considerations. Project Management Journal, 46(2), 6–20.doi:10.1002/pmj.21479
5.
BrownM. (2012). John Dewey’s logic of science. The Journal of the International Society for the Philosophy of Science, 2(2), 258–306.
6.
ChiaR.HoltR. (2006). Strategy as practical coping: A Heideggerian perspective. Organization Studies, 27(5), 635–655.doi:10.1177/0170840606064102
7.
CicmilS. (2006). Understanding project management practice through interpretative and critical research perspectives. Project Management Journal, 37(2), 27–37.doi:10.1177/875697280603700204
8.
CicmilS.WilliamsT.ThomasJ.HodgsonD. (2006). Rethinking project management: Researching the actuality of projects. International Journal of Project Management, 24(8), 675–686.doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2006.08.006
9.
CorradiG.GherardiS.VerzelloniL. (2010). Through the practice lens: Where is the bandwagon of practice-based studies heading?Management Learning, 41(3), 265–283.doi:10.1177/1350507609356938
10.
CunliffeA. L.HibbertP. (2016). The philosophical basis of leadership-as-practice from a hermeneutical perspective. InRaelinJ. A. (Ed.), Leadership-as-practice: Theory and application (pp.50–69). Routledge.
11.
CzarniawskaB. (2007). Shadowing and other techniques for doing fieldwork in modern societies. Liber.
12.
DeweyJ. (1938). Logic: The theory of inquiry. Henry Holt and Co.
13.
DeweyJ. (1916). Essays in experimental logic. University of Chicago Press.
14.
DeweyJ.BentleyA. F. (1949[1960]). Knowing and the known. Greenwood Press.
15.
FeldmanM. S.OrlikowskiW. J. (2011). Theorizing practice and practicing theory. Organization Science, 22(5), 1240–1253.doi:10.1287/orsc.1100.0612
16.
GarudR.SimpsonB.LangleyA.TsoukasH. (2015). Introduction: How does novelty emerge?InGarudR.SimpsonB.LangleyA.TsoukasH. (Eds.), The emergence of novelty in organizations (pp.1–24). Oxford University Press.
17.
GeraldiJ.SöderlundJ. (2018). Project studies: What it is, where it is going. International Journal of Project Management, 36(1), 55–70.doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.06.004
18.
HallgrenM.SoderholmA. (2011). Projects-as-practice: New approach, new insights. InMorrisP. W. G.PintoJ.SoderlundJ. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of project management. Oxford University Press.
19.
HendryJ.SeidlD. (2003). The structure and significance of strategic episodes: Social systems theory and the routine practices of strategic change. Journal of Management Studies, 40(1), 175–196.doi:10.1111/1467-6486.00008
20.
JamesW. (1912). Essays in radical empiricism. Longmans, Green and Company.
21.
JarzabkowskiP. (2005). Strategy as practice: An activity-based approach. Sage.
22.
LalondeP.-L.BourgaultM.FindeliA. (2010). Building Pragmatist theories of PM practice: Theorizing the act of project management. Project Management Journal, 41(5), 21–36.doi:10.1002/pmj.20163
23.
LalondeP.-L.BourgaultM.FindeliA. (2012). An empirical investigation of the project situation: PM practice as an inquiry process. International Journal of Project Management, 30(4), 418–431.doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2011.09.005
24.
LangleyA.TsoukasH. (2010). Introducing perspectives on process organization studies. InHernesT.MaitlisS. (Eds.), Process, sensemaking, and organizing (pp.3–26). Oxford University Press.
25.
LatourB. (1999). Pandora’s hope: Essays on the reality of science studies. Harvard University Press.
26.
LorinoP.MoureyD. (2013). The experience of time in the inter-organizing inquiry: A present thickened by dialog and situations. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 29(1), 48–62.doi:10.1016/j.scaman.2012.11.011
27.
LorinoP.TricardB.ClotY. (2011). Research methods for non-representational approaches to organizational complexity: The dialogical mediated inquiry. Organization Studies, 32(6), 769–801.doi:10.1177/0170840611410807
28.
MartelaF. (2015). Fallible inquiry with ethical ends-in-view: A Pragmatist philosophy of science for organizational research. Organization Studies, 36(4), 537–563.doi:10.1177/0170840614559257
29.
McDonaldS. (2005). Studying actions in context: A qualitative shadowing method for organizational research. Qualitative Research, 5(4), 455–473.doi:10.1177/1468794105056923
30.
MiettinenR.Samra-FredericksD.YanowD. (2009). Re-Turn to practice: An introductory essay. Organization Studies, 30(12), 1309–1327.doi:10.1177/0170840609349860
31.
NicoliniD.GherardiS.YanowD.. (Eds.). (2003). Knowing in organizations: A practice-based approach. M. F. Sharpe.
32.
OrlikowskiW. J. (2000). Using technology and constituting structures: A practice lens for studying technology in organizations. Organization Science, 11(4), 404–428.doi:10.1287/orsc.11.4.404.14600
33.
OrlikowskiW. J. (2002). Knowing in practice: Enacting a collective capability in distributed organizing. Organization Science, 13(3), 249–273.doi:10.1287/orsc.13.3.249.2776
34.
OrlikowskiW. (2010). Practice in research: phenomenon, perspective and philosophy. InGolsorkhiD.RouleauL.SeidlD.VaaraE. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of strategy as practice (pp.23–33). Cambridge University Press.
35.
PackendorffJ.CrevaniL.LindgrenM. (2014). Project leadership in becoming: A process study of an organizational change project. Project Management Journal, 45(3), 5–20.doi:10.1002/pmj.21418
36.
PickeringA. (1995). The mangle of practice: Time, agency and science. University of Chicago Press.
37.
RaelinJ. A. (2016). Introduction to leadership-as-practice: Theory and application. InRaelinJ. A. (Ed.), Leadership-as-practice: Theory and application (pp.1–18). Routledge.
38.
RittelH. W. J.WebberM. M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4(2), 155–169.doi:10.1007/BF01405730
39.
SandbergJ.TsoukasH. (2011). Grasping the logic of practice: Theorizing through practical rationality. Academy of Management Review, 36(2), 338–360.
40.
SchatzkiT. R.Knorr CetinaK.von SavignyE.. (Eds.). (2001). The practice turn in contemporary theory. Routledge.
41.
SergiV. (2012). Bounded becoming: Insights from understanding projects in situation. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 5(3), 345–363.doi:10.1108/17538371211235263
42.
ShotterJ. (2016). Turning leadership inside-out and back-to-front: A dialogical hermeneutical account. InRaelinJ. A. (Ed.), Leadership-as-practice: Theory and application (pp.132–156). Routledge.
43.
SimpsonB. (2018). Pragmatism: A philosophy of practice. InCunliffeC. C. A.GrandyG. (Eds.), SAGE handbook of qualitative business and management research methods: History and traditions (pp. 54–68). Sage.
44.
SimpsonB. (2016). Where’s the agency in leadership-as-practice?InRaelinJ. A. (Ed.), Leadership-as-practice: Theory and application (pp.159–177). Routledge.
45.
SimpsonB.BuchanL.SillinceJ. (2018). The performativity of leadership talk. Leadership, 14(6), 644–661.doi:10.1177/1742715017710591
46.
SöderlundJ. (2005). What project management really is about: Alternative perspectives on the role and practice of project management. International Journal of Technology Management, 32(3/4), 371–387.doi:10.1504/IJTM.2005.007340
47.
UrryJ. (2007). Mobilities. Polity Press.
48.
Van De VenA. H.JohnsonP. E. (2006). Knowledge for theory and practice. Academy of Management Review, 31(4), 802–821.doi:10.5465/amr.2006.22527385
49.
VásquezC.BrummansB. H. J. M.GroleauC. (2012). Notes from the field on organizational shadowing as framing. Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: An International Journal, 7(2), 144–165.doi:10.1108/17465641211253075
50.
WhiteheadA. N. (1926). Science and modern world. Cambridge University Press.
51.
WhittingtonR. (2006). Completing the practice turn in strategy research. Organization Studies, 27(5), 613–634.doi:10.1177/0170840606064101
52.
WinterM.SmithC.MorrisP.CicmilS. (2006). Directions for future research in project management: The main findings of a UK government-funded research network. International Journal of Project Management, 24(8), 638–649.doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2006.08.009
